TY - JOUR
T1 - "New" metastases are associated with a poorer prognosis than growth of pre-existing metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy
AU - Twelves, Christopher
AU - Cortes, Javier
AU - Kaufman, Peter A.
AU - Yelle, Louise
AU - Awada, Ahmad
AU - Binder, Terri A.
AU - Olivo, Martin
AU - Song, James
AU - O'Shaughnessy, Joyce A.
AU - Jove, Maria
AU - Perez, Edith A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Eisai Inc. funded the studies and supported the authors in the development of the study design, and in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. CT, PK, and JC contributed to the study conception and design; CT, EP, JC, PK, LY, and AA contributed to the collection of data. All authors contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, and the development of the manuscript. Medical writing support was provided by Oxford PharmaGenesis and was supported and funded by Eisai Inc. The authors have had full access to the study data. The decision to submit was taken jointly by the authors and Eisai Inc. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Twelves et al.
PY - 2015/12/9
Y1 - 2015/12/9
N2 - Introduction: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) endpoints often only weakly correlate. This analysis investigates how different progression events impact on OS, using data from two phase 3 studies with eribulin in women with advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In Study 301, 1102 women with ≤2 prior chemotherapies for advanced/MBC were randomized to eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) or capecitabine (1.25 g/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days). Study 305/EMBRACE enrolled 762 patients following two to five prior chemotherapies for advanced/MBC, randomized to eribulin (as above) or treatment of physician's choice. We analyzed OS and PFS post hoc for patients whose disease progressed due to development of "new" metastases, growth of pre-existing lesions, and patients with no reported disease progression. Results: In both clinical studies, development of new metastases was associated with an increased risk of death (p < 0.0001). The time to development of new metastasis or death was significantly longer with eribulin than the comparator in Study 305 (p = 0.0017), but not in Study 301 (p = 0.46). Significantly longer OS was observed in the eribulin compared with the comparator arm for the new metastases subgroup in Study 301 (p = 0.008), but not in Study 305 (p = 0.16), compared with other progression subgroups. Conclusions: Patients with MBC progressing with new metastases have a worse prognosis than those whose disease progresses due to growth of existing lesions or patients with no reported disease progression. These findings have potentially important implications for the interpretation of clinical study data and clinical practice.
AB - Introduction: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) endpoints often only weakly correlate. This analysis investigates how different progression events impact on OS, using data from two phase 3 studies with eribulin in women with advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In Study 301, 1102 women with ≤2 prior chemotherapies for advanced/MBC were randomized to eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) or capecitabine (1.25 g/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days). Study 305/EMBRACE enrolled 762 patients following two to five prior chemotherapies for advanced/MBC, randomized to eribulin (as above) or treatment of physician's choice. We analyzed OS and PFS post hoc for patients whose disease progressed due to development of "new" metastases, growth of pre-existing lesions, and patients with no reported disease progression. Results: In both clinical studies, development of new metastases was associated with an increased risk of death (p < 0.0001). The time to development of new metastasis or death was significantly longer with eribulin than the comparator in Study 305 (p = 0.0017), but not in Study 301 (p = 0.46). Significantly longer OS was observed in the eribulin compared with the comparator arm for the new metastases subgroup in Study 301 (p = 0.008), but not in Study 305 (p = 0.16), compared with other progression subgroups. Conclusions: Patients with MBC progressing with new metastases have a worse prognosis than those whose disease progresses due to growth of existing lesions or patients with no reported disease progression. These findings have potentially important implications for the interpretation of clinical study data and clinical practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952875206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952875206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13058-015-0657-1
DO - 10.1186/s13058-015-0657-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 27391598
AN - SCOPUS:84952875206
SN - 1465-5411
VL - 17
JO - Breast Cancer Research
JF - Breast Cancer Research
IS - 1
M1 - 150
ER -