TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-institutional analysis of radiation modality use and postoperative outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer
AU - Lin, Steven H.
AU - Merrell, Kenneth W.
AU - Shen, Jincheng
AU - Verma, Vivek
AU - Correa, Arlene M.
AU - Wang, Lu
AU - Thall, Peter F.
AU - Bhooshan, Neha
AU - James, Sarah E.
AU - Haddock, Michael G.
AU - Suntharalingam, Mohan
AU - Mehta, Minesh P.
AU - Liao, Zhongxing
AU - Cox, James D.
AU - Komaki, Ritsuko
AU - Mehran, Reza J.
AU - Chuong, Michael D.
AU - Hallemeier, Christopher L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Purpose Relative radiation dose exposure to vital organs in the thorax could influence clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer (EC). We assessed whether the type of radiation therapy (RT) modality used was associated with postoperative outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Patients and methods Contemporary data from 580 EC patients treated with nCRT at 3 academic institutions from 2007 to 2013 were reviewed. 3D conformal RT (3D), intensity modulated RT (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT) were used for 214 (37%), 255 (44%), and 111 (19%) patients, respectively. Postoperative outcomes included pulmonary, GI, cardiac, wound healing complications, length of in-hospital stay (LOS), and 90-day postoperative mortality. Cox model fits, and log-rank tests both with and without Inverse Probability of treatment Weighting (IPW) were used to correct for bias due to non-randomization. Results RT modality was significantly associated with the incidence of pulmonary, cardiac and wound complications, which also bore out on multivariate analysis. Mean LOS was also significantly associated with treatment modality (13.2 days for 3D (95%CI 11.7–14.7), 11.6 days for IMRT (95%CI 10.9–12.7), and 9.3 days for PBT (95%CI 8.2–10.3) (p < 0.0001)). The 90 day postoperative mortality rates were 4.2%, 4.3%, and 0.9%, respectively, for 3D, IMRT and PBT (p = 0.264). Conclusions Advanced RT technologies (IMRT and PBT) were associated with significantly reduced rate of postoperative complications and LOS compared to 3D, with PBT displaying the greatest benefit in a number of clinical endpoints. Ongoing prospective randomized trial will be needed to validate these results.
AB - Purpose Relative radiation dose exposure to vital organs in the thorax could influence clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer (EC). We assessed whether the type of radiation therapy (RT) modality used was associated with postoperative outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Patients and methods Contemporary data from 580 EC patients treated with nCRT at 3 academic institutions from 2007 to 2013 were reviewed. 3D conformal RT (3D), intensity modulated RT (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT) were used for 214 (37%), 255 (44%), and 111 (19%) patients, respectively. Postoperative outcomes included pulmonary, GI, cardiac, wound healing complications, length of in-hospital stay (LOS), and 90-day postoperative mortality. Cox model fits, and log-rank tests both with and without Inverse Probability of treatment Weighting (IPW) were used to correct for bias due to non-randomization. Results RT modality was significantly associated with the incidence of pulmonary, cardiac and wound complications, which also bore out on multivariate analysis. Mean LOS was also significantly associated with treatment modality (13.2 days for 3D (95%CI 11.7–14.7), 11.6 days for IMRT (95%CI 10.9–12.7), and 9.3 days for PBT (95%CI 8.2–10.3) (p < 0.0001)). The 90 day postoperative mortality rates were 4.2%, 4.3%, and 0.9%, respectively, for 3D, IMRT and PBT (p = 0.264). Conclusions Advanced RT technologies (IMRT and PBT) were associated with significantly reduced rate of postoperative complications and LOS compared to 3D, with PBT displaying the greatest benefit in a number of clinical endpoints. Ongoing prospective randomized trial will be needed to validate these results.
KW - Esophageal carcinoma
KW - Intensity modulated radiation therapy
KW - Postoperative complications
KW - Proton beam therapy
KW - Radiation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018693486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018693486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.04.013
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.04.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 28455153
AN - SCOPUS:85018693486
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 123
SP - 376
EP - 381
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 3
ER -