TY - JOUR
T1 - MR imaging of the pelvis
AU - Heiken, J. P.
AU - Lee, J. K.T.
PY - 1988
Y1 - 1988
N2 - MR imaging has been shown to be an excellent method for displaying normal and abnormal pelvic anatomy. Although it is not tissue specific, it provides information helpful in characterizing most pelvic masses and is particularly useful in demonstrating the relationship of a pelvic mass to adjacent normal structures. The limited clinical data currently available indicate that MR imaging can improve on the accuracy of other radiologic methods used for the local staging of pelvic neoplasms. However, large prospective studies comparing MR with other cross-sectional imaging techniques, such as CT and ultrasound (US), are lacking. At present, US remains the method of choice for evaluating most benign pelvic conditions because of its ease of performance and lower cost. CT, although somewhat inferior to MR imaging in the local staging of pelvic neoplasms, is a much more efficient method for evaluating the remainder of the abdomen and chest for metastatic disease. Nevertheless, MR should continue to assume an increasingly prominent role in the imaging evaluation of the pelvis, particularly if technological refinements are able to improve the efficiency and decrease the cost of examinations.
AB - MR imaging has been shown to be an excellent method for displaying normal and abnormal pelvic anatomy. Although it is not tissue specific, it provides information helpful in characterizing most pelvic masses and is particularly useful in demonstrating the relationship of a pelvic mass to adjacent normal structures. The limited clinical data currently available indicate that MR imaging can improve on the accuracy of other radiologic methods used for the local staging of pelvic neoplasms. However, large prospective studies comparing MR with other cross-sectional imaging techniques, such as CT and ultrasound (US), are lacking. At present, US remains the method of choice for evaluating most benign pelvic conditions because of its ease of performance and lower cost. CT, although somewhat inferior to MR imaging in the local staging of pelvic neoplasms, is a much more efficient method for evaluating the remainder of the abdomen and chest for metastatic disease. Nevertheless, MR should continue to assume an increasingly prominent role in the imaging evaluation of the pelvis, particularly if technological refinements are able to improve the efficiency and decrease the cost of examinations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023841469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023841469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336668
DO - 10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336668
M3 - Article
C2 - 3336668
AN - SCOPUS:0023841469
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 166
SP - 11
EP - 16
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 1 I
ER -