MR imaging of the pelvis

Jay Heiken, J. K.T. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

MR imaging has been shown to be an excellent method for displaying normal and abnormal pelvic anatomy. Although it is not tissue specific, it provides information helpful in characterizing most pelvic masses and is particularly useful in demonstrating the relationship of a pelvic mass to adjacent normal structures. The limited clinical data currently available indicate that MR imaging can improve on the accuracy of other radiologic methods used for the local staging of pelvic neoplasms. However, large prospective studies comparing MR with other cross-sectional imaging techniques, such as CT and ultrasound (US), are lacking. At present, US remains the method of choice for evaluating most benign pelvic conditions because of its ease of performance and lower cost. CT, although somewhat inferior to MR imaging in the local staging of pelvic neoplasms, is a much more efficient method for evaluating the remainder of the abdomen and chest for metastatic disease. Nevertheless, MR should continue to assume an increasingly prominent role in the imaging evaluation of the pelvis, particularly if technological refinements are able to improve the efficiency and decrease the cost of examinations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-16
Number of pages6
JournalRadiology
Volume166
Issue number1 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pelvis
Pelvic Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Abdomen
Anatomy
Thorax
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MR imaging of the pelvis. / Heiken, Jay; Lee, J. K.T.

In: Radiology, Vol. 166, No. 1 I, 01.01.1988, p. 11-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heiken, Jay ; Lee, J. K.T. / MR imaging of the pelvis. In: Radiology. 1988 ; Vol. 166, No. 1 I. pp. 11-16.
@article{b788a57d25794969958e82fe431cb7bf,
title = "MR imaging of the pelvis",
abstract = "MR imaging has been shown to be an excellent method for displaying normal and abnormal pelvic anatomy. Although it is not tissue specific, it provides information helpful in characterizing most pelvic masses and is particularly useful in demonstrating the relationship of a pelvic mass to adjacent normal structures. The limited clinical data currently available indicate that MR imaging can improve on the accuracy of other radiologic methods used for the local staging of pelvic neoplasms. However, large prospective studies comparing MR with other cross-sectional imaging techniques, such as CT and ultrasound (US), are lacking. At present, US remains the method of choice for evaluating most benign pelvic conditions because of its ease of performance and lower cost. CT, although somewhat inferior to MR imaging in the local staging of pelvic neoplasms, is a much more efficient method for evaluating the remainder of the abdomen and chest for metastatic disease. Nevertheless, MR should continue to assume an increasingly prominent role in the imaging evaluation of the pelvis, particularly if technological refinements are able to improve the efficiency and decrease the cost of examinations.",
author = "Jay Heiken and Lee, {J. K.T.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336668",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "166",
pages = "11--16",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MR imaging of the pelvis

AU - Heiken, Jay

AU - Lee, J. K.T.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - MR imaging has been shown to be an excellent method for displaying normal and abnormal pelvic anatomy. Although it is not tissue specific, it provides information helpful in characterizing most pelvic masses and is particularly useful in demonstrating the relationship of a pelvic mass to adjacent normal structures. The limited clinical data currently available indicate that MR imaging can improve on the accuracy of other radiologic methods used for the local staging of pelvic neoplasms. However, large prospective studies comparing MR with other cross-sectional imaging techniques, such as CT and ultrasound (US), are lacking. At present, US remains the method of choice for evaluating most benign pelvic conditions because of its ease of performance and lower cost. CT, although somewhat inferior to MR imaging in the local staging of pelvic neoplasms, is a much more efficient method for evaluating the remainder of the abdomen and chest for metastatic disease. Nevertheless, MR should continue to assume an increasingly prominent role in the imaging evaluation of the pelvis, particularly if technological refinements are able to improve the efficiency and decrease the cost of examinations.

AB - MR imaging has been shown to be an excellent method for displaying normal and abnormal pelvic anatomy. Although it is not tissue specific, it provides information helpful in characterizing most pelvic masses and is particularly useful in demonstrating the relationship of a pelvic mass to adjacent normal structures. The limited clinical data currently available indicate that MR imaging can improve on the accuracy of other radiologic methods used for the local staging of pelvic neoplasms. However, large prospective studies comparing MR with other cross-sectional imaging techniques, such as CT and ultrasound (US), are lacking. At present, US remains the method of choice for evaluating most benign pelvic conditions because of its ease of performance and lower cost. CT, although somewhat inferior to MR imaging in the local staging of pelvic neoplasms, is a much more efficient method for evaluating the remainder of the abdomen and chest for metastatic disease. Nevertheless, MR should continue to assume an increasingly prominent role in the imaging evaluation of the pelvis, particularly if technological refinements are able to improve the efficiency and decrease the cost of examinations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023841469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023841469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336668

DO - 10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336668

M3 - Article

C2 - 3336668

AN - SCOPUS:0023841469

VL - 166

SP - 11

EP - 16

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1 I

ER -