TY - JOUR
T1 - Missed opportunity? Caregiver participation in the clinical encounter. A videographic analysis
AU - Boehmer, Kasey R.
AU - Egginton, Jason S.
AU - Branda, Megan E.
AU - Kryworuchko, Jennifer
AU - Bodde, Amy
AU - Montori, Victor M.
AU - LeBlanc, Annie D
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Objective: Although the assistance of caregivers is critical to patients undertaking self-care, little is known about their participation in visits and involvement in decision making. We sought to examine this caregiver participation in shared decision making through videographic analysis. Methods: We identified video recordings from outpatient visits in which a healthcare professional, patient, and caregiver participated, drawn from five practice-based randomized trials testing the efficacy of decision aids vs. usual care. Two reviewers, working independently, coded videos to explore caregiver engagement in the clinical encounter, clinician facilitation of that engagement, and the influence of decision aids in the engagement process. Results: In most of the 37 videos coded, caregivers' participation was self-triggered. We saw no impact of the use of decision aids on caregiver participation. Clinicians did not address the caregivers' preferred level of involvement in decision making in any of the video recorded encounters analyzed. Conclusion: In this analysis, most clinicians did not engage caregivers in outpatient visits for chronic care. While the use of decision aids improves communication between patient and clinician, they do not appear to affect caregiver involvement during consultations. Practice implications: Research on the comparative effectiveness of ways to engage caregivers to optimize patient-important outcomes, including enhancing the shared decision making process is necessary.
AB - Objective: Although the assistance of caregivers is critical to patients undertaking self-care, little is known about their participation in visits and involvement in decision making. We sought to examine this caregiver participation in shared decision making through videographic analysis. Methods: We identified video recordings from outpatient visits in which a healthcare professional, patient, and caregiver participated, drawn from five practice-based randomized trials testing the efficacy of decision aids vs. usual care. Two reviewers, working independently, coded videos to explore caregiver engagement in the clinical encounter, clinician facilitation of that engagement, and the influence of decision aids in the engagement process. Results: In most of the 37 videos coded, caregivers' participation was self-triggered. We saw no impact of the use of decision aids on caregiver participation. Clinicians did not address the caregivers' preferred level of involvement in decision making in any of the video recorded encounters analyzed. Conclusion: In this analysis, most clinicians did not engage caregivers in outpatient visits for chronic care. While the use of decision aids improves communication between patient and clinician, they do not appear to affect caregiver involvement during consultations. Practice implications: Research on the comparative effectiveness of ways to engage caregivers to optimize patient-important outcomes, including enhancing the shared decision making process is necessary.
KW - Caregivers
KW - Chronic care
KW - Comorbidity
KW - Decision support
KW - Shared decision making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906791758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906791758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.016
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 24998721
AN - SCOPUS:84906791758
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 96
SP - 302
EP - 307
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 3
ER -