Minilaparoscopic appendectomy

B. D. Matthews, G. Mostafa, K. L. Harold, K. W. Kercher, P. R. Reardon, B. T. Heniford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 2-mm laparoscopic instruments in the treatment of appendicitis and to identify risk factors that may limit their use. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was performed through a 2-mm port in the umbilicus for a videoendoscope, a 2-mm working port in the right upper quadrant, and a 5/12-mm suprapubic port for an endoscopic stapler. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was attempted in 26 consecutive patients with appendicitis. Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic appendectomy with 5- and 10-mm instruments and videoendoscopes before the availability of 2-mm instrumentation were analyzed for comparison. Statistical comparisons were made by the Student t test and Fisher exact test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a P value less than 0.05. There were no conversions to an open appendectomy in the minilaparoscopic appendectomy or conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group. The mean operative time was 69.5 minutes for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 85.5 minutes for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.02). The mean postoperative length of stay was 1.7 days for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 2.5 days for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the complication rates (P = 0.31). Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was completed in 13 (50.0%) patients. Independent risk factors (P = 0.05) for conversion to 5- or 10-mm ports were a retrocecal appendix and increasing patient age. There were no differences in the mean postoperative length of stay (P = 0.12) or complication rate (P = 0.39) between the two groups, but mean operative time was longer (P = 0.05) in the converted group. Perioperative outcomes for minilaparoscopic appendectomy are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. The use of 2-mm instrumentation in the management of appendicitis is limited in patients with retrocecal appendicitis. Increasing patient age and a history of abdominal surgery may influence the need to convert 2-mm ports to 5- or 10-mm ports.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-355
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Appendectomy
Appendicitis
Operative Time
Length of Stay
Umbilicus

Keywords

  • Appendectomy
  • Appendicitis
  • Laparoscopy
  • Minilaparoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Matthews, B. D., Mostafa, G., Harold, K. L., Kercher, K. W., Reardon, P. R., & Heniford, B. T. (2001). Minilaparoscopic appendectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, 11(6), 351-355. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019509-200112000-00002

Minilaparoscopic appendectomy. / Matthews, B. D.; Mostafa, G.; Harold, K. L.; Kercher, K. W.; Reardon, P. R.; Heniford, B. T.

In: Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2001, p. 351-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matthews, BD, Mostafa, G, Harold, KL, Kercher, KW, Reardon, PR & Heniford, BT 2001, 'Minilaparoscopic appendectomy', Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 351-355. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019509-200112000-00002
Matthews BD, Mostafa G, Harold KL, Kercher KW, Reardon PR, Heniford BT. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques. 2001;11(6):351-355. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019509-200112000-00002
Matthews, B. D. ; Mostafa, G. ; Harold, K. L. ; Kercher, K. W. ; Reardon, P. R. ; Heniford, B. T. / Minilaparoscopic appendectomy. In: Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques. 2001 ; Vol. 11, No. 6. pp. 351-355.
@article{00d617517f364a24811e06b5ad8a23e7,
title = "Minilaparoscopic appendectomy",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 2-mm laparoscopic instruments in the treatment of appendicitis and to identify risk factors that may limit their use. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was performed through a 2-mm port in the umbilicus for a videoendoscope, a 2-mm working port in the right upper quadrant, and a 5/12-mm suprapubic port for an endoscopic stapler. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was attempted in 26 consecutive patients with appendicitis. Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic appendectomy with 5- and 10-mm instruments and videoendoscopes before the availability of 2-mm instrumentation were analyzed for comparison. Statistical comparisons were made by the Student t test and Fisher exact test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a P value less than 0.05. There were no conversions to an open appendectomy in the minilaparoscopic appendectomy or conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group. The mean operative time was 69.5 minutes for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 85.5 minutes for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.02). The mean postoperative length of stay was 1.7 days for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 2.5 days for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the complication rates (P = 0.31). Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was completed in 13 (50.0{\%}) patients. Independent risk factors (P = 0.05) for conversion to 5- or 10-mm ports were a retrocecal appendix and increasing patient age. There were no differences in the mean postoperative length of stay (P = 0.12) or complication rate (P = 0.39) between the two groups, but mean operative time was longer (P = 0.05) in the converted group. Perioperative outcomes for minilaparoscopic appendectomy are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. The use of 2-mm instrumentation in the management of appendicitis is limited in patients with retrocecal appendicitis. Increasing patient age and a history of abdominal surgery may influence the need to convert 2-mm ports to 5- or 10-mm ports.",
keywords = "Appendectomy, Appendicitis, Laparoscopy, Minilaparoscopy",
author = "Matthews, {B. D.} and G. Mostafa and Harold, {K. L.} and Kercher, {K. W.} and Reardon, {P. R.} and Heniford, {B. T.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1097/00019509-200112000-00002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "351--355",
journal = "Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques",
issn = "1051-7200",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minilaparoscopic appendectomy

AU - Matthews, B. D.

AU - Mostafa, G.

AU - Harold, K. L.

AU - Kercher, K. W.

AU - Reardon, P. R.

AU - Heniford, B. T.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 2-mm laparoscopic instruments in the treatment of appendicitis and to identify risk factors that may limit their use. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was performed through a 2-mm port in the umbilicus for a videoendoscope, a 2-mm working port in the right upper quadrant, and a 5/12-mm suprapubic port for an endoscopic stapler. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was attempted in 26 consecutive patients with appendicitis. Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic appendectomy with 5- and 10-mm instruments and videoendoscopes before the availability of 2-mm instrumentation were analyzed for comparison. Statistical comparisons were made by the Student t test and Fisher exact test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a P value less than 0.05. There were no conversions to an open appendectomy in the minilaparoscopic appendectomy or conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group. The mean operative time was 69.5 minutes for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 85.5 minutes for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.02). The mean postoperative length of stay was 1.7 days for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 2.5 days for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the complication rates (P = 0.31). Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was completed in 13 (50.0%) patients. Independent risk factors (P = 0.05) for conversion to 5- or 10-mm ports were a retrocecal appendix and increasing patient age. There were no differences in the mean postoperative length of stay (P = 0.12) or complication rate (P = 0.39) between the two groups, but mean operative time was longer (P = 0.05) in the converted group. Perioperative outcomes for minilaparoscopic appendectomy are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. The use of 2-mm instrumentation in the management of appendicitis is limited in patients with retrocecal appendicitis. Increasing patient age and a history of abdominal surgery may influence the need to convert 2-mm ports to 5- or 10-mm ports.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using 2-mm laparoscopic instruments in the treatment of appendicitis and to identify risk factors that may limit their use. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was performed through a 2-mm port in the umbilicus for a videoendoscope, a 2-mm working port in the right upper quadrant, and a 5/12-mm suprapubic port for an endoscopic stapler. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was attempted in 26 consecutive patients with appendicitis. Thirty-two consecutive patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic appendectomy with 5- and 10-mm instruments and videoendoscopes before the availability of 2-mm instrumentation were analyzed for comparison. Statistical comparisons were made by the Student t test and Fisher exact test. Differences were considered statistically significant at a P value less than 0.05. There were no conversions to an open appendectomy in the minilaparoscopic appendectomy or conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group. The mean operative time was 69.5 minutes for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 85.5 minutes for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.02). The mean postoperative length of stay was 1.7 days for the minilaparoscopic appendectomy group and 2.5 days for the conventional laparoscopic appendectomy group (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the complication rates (P = 0.31). Minilaparoscopic appendectomy was completed in 13 (50.0%) patients. Independent risk factors (P = 0.05) for conversion to 5- or 10-mm ports were a retrocecal appendix and increasing patient age. There were no differences in the mean postoperative length of stay (P = 0.12) or complication rate (P = 0.39) between the two groups, but mean operative time was longer (P = 0.05) in the converted group. Perioperative outcomes for minilaparoscopic appendectomy are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. The use of 2-mm instrumentation in the management of appendicitis is limited in patients with retrocecal appendicitis. Increasing patient age and a history of abdominal surgery may influence the need to convert 2-mm ports to 5- or 10-mm ports.

KW - Appendectomy

KW - Appendicitis

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Minilaparoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035660964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035660964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00019509-200112000-00002

DO - 10.1097/00019509-200112000-00002

M3 - Article

C2 - 11822857

AN - SCOPUS:0035660964

VL - 11

SP - 351

EP - 355

JO - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

JF - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

SN - 1051-7200

IS - 6

ER -