Methods to impute missing genotypes for population data

Zhaoxia Yu, Daniel J Schaid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For large-scale genotyping studies, it is common for most subjects to have some missing genetic markers, even if the missing rate per marker is low. This compromises association analyses, with varying numbers of subjects contributing to analyses when performing single-marker or multi-marker analyses. In this paper, we consider eight methods to infer missing genotypes, including two haplotype reconstruction methods (local expectation maximization-EM, and fastPHASE), two k-nearest neighbor methods (original k-nearest neighbor, KNN, and a weighted k-nearest neighbor, wtKNN), three linear regression methods (backward variable selection, LM.back, least angle regression, LM.lars, and singular value decomposition, LM.svd), and a regression tree, Rtree. We evaluate the accuracy of them using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from the HapMap project, under a variety of conditions and parameters. We find that fastPHASE has the lowest error rates across different analysis panels and marker densities. LM.lars gives slightly less accurate estimate of missing genotypes than fastPHASE, but has better performance than the other methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-504
Number of pages10
JournalHuman Genetics
Volume122
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Genotype
Population
HapMap Project
Genetic Markers
Haplotypes
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Linear Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Methods to impute missing genotypes for population data. / Yu, Zhaoxia; Schaid, Daniel J.

In: Human Genetics, Vol. 122, No. 5, 12.2007, p. 495-504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yu, Zhaoxia ; Schaid, Daniel J. / Methods to impute missing genotypes for population data. In: Human Genetics. 2007 ; Vol. 122, No. 5. pp. 495-504.
@article{da0fd1c7465e4213919bc560c293205d,
title = "Methods to impute missing genotypes for population data",
abstract = "For large-scale genotyping studies, it is common for most subjects to have some missing genetic markers, even if the missing rate per marker is low. This compromises association analyses, with varying numbers of subjects contributing to analyses when performing single-marker or multi-marker analyses. In this paper, we consider eight methods to infer missing genotypes, including two haplotype reconstruction methods (local expectation maximization-EM, and fastPHASE), two k-nearest neighbor methods (original k-nearest neighbor, KNN, and a weighted k-nearest neighbor, wtKNN), three linear regression methods (backward variable selection, LM.back, least angle regression, LM.lars, and singular value decomposition, LM.svd), and a regression tree, Rtree. We evaluate the accuracy of them using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from the HapMap project, under a variety of conditions and parameters. We find that fastPHASE has the lowest error rates across different analysis panels and marker densities. LM.lars gives slightly less accurate estimate of missing genotypes than fastPHASE, but has better performance than the other methods.",
author = "Zhaoxia Yu and Schaid, {Daniel J}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00439-007-0427-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "495--504",
journal = "Human Genetics",
issn = "0340-6717",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods to impute missing genotypes for population data

AU - Yu, Zhaoxia

AU - Schaid, Daniel J

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - For large-scale genotyping studies, it is common for most subjects to have some missing genetic markers, even if the missing rate per marker is low. This compromises association analyses, with varying numbers of subjects contributing to analyses when performing single-marker or multi-marker analyses. In this paper, we consider eight methods to infer missing genotypes, including two haplotype reconstruction methods (local expectation maximization-EM, and fastPHASE), two k-nearest neighbor methods (original k-nearest neighbor, KNN, and a weighted k-nearest neighbor, wtKNN), three linear regression methods (backward variable selection, LM.back, least angle regression, LM.lars, and singular value decomposition, LM.svd), and a regression tree, Rtree. We evaluate the accuracy of them using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from the HapMap project, under a variety of conditions and parameters. We find that fastPHASE has the lowest error rates across different analysis panels and marker densities. LM.lars gives slightly less accurate estimate of missing genotypes than fastPHASE, but has better performance than the other methods.

AB - For large-scale genotyping studies, it is common for most subjects to have some missing genetic markers, even if the missing rate per marker is low. This compromises association analyses, with varying numbers of subjects contributing to analyses when performing single-marker or multi-marker analyses. In this paper, we consider eight methods to infer missing genotypes, including two haplotype reconstruction methods (local expectation maximization-EM, and fastPHASE), two k-nearest neighbor methods (original k-nearest neighbor, KNN, and a weighted k-nearest neighbor, wtKNN), three linear regression methods (backward variable selection, LM.back, least angle regression, LM.lars, and singular value decomposition, LM.svd), and a regression tree, Rtree. We evaluate the accuracy of them using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from the HapMap project, under a variety of conditions and parameters. We find that fastPHASE has the lowest error rates across different analysis panels and marker densities. LM.lars gives slightly less accurate estimate of missing genotypes than fastPHASE, but has better performance than the other methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36348978013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36348978013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00439-007-0427-y

DO - 10.1007/s00439-007-0427-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 17851696

AN - SCOPUS:36348978013

VL - 122

SP - 495

EP - 504

JO - Human Genetics

JF - Human Genetics

SN - 0340-6717

IS - 5

ER -