Measuring shoulder internal rotation range of motion

A comparison of 3 techniques

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the reliability of shoulder internal rotation (IR) range of motion (ROM) measured using 3 different methods: standard technique, manual scapular stabilization technique, and visual inspection technique. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Clinic-based sports medicine center. Participants: Convenience sample of 56 unimpaired highschool athlete volunteers. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Shoulder IR ROM was measured by using a digital inclinometer with each of the 3 techniques. All measurements were performed independently by 2 groups of examiners and repeated to determine intra- and interrater reliabilities. Results: IR ROM measurements obtained with the scapula stabilized or by visual inspection were significantly less than when measured with the standard technique (P=.001). Intrarater reliability was good or excellent for all 3 methods (intraclass correlation coefficients =.63-.71), was similar for the scapular stabilization and visual inspection techniques, and was superior to that previously reported for similar measurements. In general, interrater reliability was lower than intrarater reliability for all measurements. Conclusion: Because the visual inspection and scapular stabilized techniques control for accessory scapulothoracic motion, these techniques may represent more valid measures of glenohumeral motion than the standard technique. Both the visual inspection and scapular stabilized techniques exhibited equally acceptable reliability for clinical use. However, because the visual inspection technique may be applied by a single examiner, we recommend its use to measure shoulder IR ROM in the clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1229-1234
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume83
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Articular Range of Motion
Scapula
Sports Medicine
Athletes
Volunteers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Physical examination
  • Range of motion
  • Rehabilitation
  • Reliability and validity
  • Shoulder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Measuring shoulder internal rotation range of motion : A comparison of 3 techniques. / Awan, Raza; Smith, Jay; Boon, Andrea.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 83, No. 9, 01.01.2002, p. 1229-1234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d097719213a84d6491df78a805d0a082,
title = "Measuring shoulder internal rotation range of motion: A comparison of 3 techniques",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the reliability of shoulder internal rotation (IR) range of motion (ROM) measured using 3 different methods: standard technique, manual scapular stabilization technique, and visual inspection technique. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Clinic-based sports medicine center. Participants: Convenience sample of 56 unimpaired highschool athlete volunteers. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Shoulder IR ROM was measured by using a digital inclinometer with each of the 3 techniques. All measurements were performed independently by 2 groups of examiners and repeated to determine intra- and interrater reliabilities. Results: IR ROM measurements obtained with the scapula stabilized or by visual inspection were significantly less than when measured with the standard technique (P=.001). Intrarater reliability was good or excellent for all 3 methods (intraclass correlation coefficients =.63-.71), was similar for the scapular stabilization and visual inspection techniques, and was superior to that previously reported for similar measurements. In general, interrater reliability was lower than intrarater reliability for all measurements. Conclusion: Because the visual inspection and scapular stabilized techniques control for accessory scapulothoracic motion, these techniques may represent more valid measures of glenohumeral motion than the standard technique. Both the visual inspection and scapular stabilized techniques exhibited equally acceptable reliability for clinical use. However, because the visual inspection technique may be applied by a single examiner, we recommend its use to measure shoulder IR ROM in the clinical setting.",
keywords = "Physical examination, Range of motion, Rehabilitation, Reliability and validity, Shoulder",
author = "Raza Awan and Jay Smith and Andrea Boon",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/apmr.2002.34815",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "1229--1234",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring shoulder internal rotation range of motion

T2 - A comparison of 3 techniques

AU - Awan, Raza

AU - Smith, Jay

AU - Boon, Andrea

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the reliability of shoulder internal rotation (IR) range of motion (ROM) measured using 3 different methods: standard technique, manual scapular stabilization technique, and visual inspection technique. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Clinic-based sports medicine center. Participants: Convenience sample of 56 unimpaired highschool athlete volunteers. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Shoulder IR ROM was measured by using a digital inclinometer with each of the 3 techniques. All measurements were performed independently by 2 groups of examiners and repeated to determine intra- and interrater reliabilities. Results: IR ROM measurements obtained with the scapula stabilized or by visual inspection were significantly less than when measured with the standard technique (P=.001). Intrarater reliability was good or excellent for all 3 methods (intraclass correlation coefficients =.63-.71), was similar for the scapular stabilization and visual inspection techniques, and was superior to that previously reported for similar measurements. In general, interrater reliability was lower than intrarater reliability for all measurements. Conclusion: Because the visual inspection and scapular stabilized techniques control for accessory scapulothoracic motion, these techniques may represent more valid measures of glenohumeral motion than the standard technique. Both the visual inspection and scapular stabilized techniques exhibited equally acceptable reliability for clinical use. However, because the visual inspection technique may be applied by a single examiner, we recommend its use to measure shoulder IR ROM in the clinical setting.

AB - Objective: To compare the reliability of shoulder internal rotation (IR) range of motion (ROM) measured using 3 different methods: standard technique, manual scapular stabilization technique, and visual inspection technique. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Clinic-based sports medicine center. Participants: Convenience sample of 56 unimpaired highschool athlete volunteers. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Shoulder IR ROM was measured by using a digital inclinometer with each of the 3 techniques. All measurements were performed independently by 2 groups of examiners and repeated to determine intra- and interrater reliabilities. Results: IR ROM measurements obtained with the scapula stabilized or by visual inspection were significantly less than when measured with the standard technique (P=.001). Intrarater reliability was good or excellent for all 3 methods (intraclass correlation coefficients =.63-.71), was similar for the scapular stabilization and visual inspection techniques, and was superior to that previously reported for similar measurements. In general, interrater reliability was lower than intrarater reliability for all measurements. Conclusion: Because the visual inspection and scapular stabilized techniques control for accessory scapulothoracic motion, these techniques may represent more valid measures of glenohumeral motion than the standard technique. Both the visual inspection and scapular stabilized techniques exhibited equally acceptable reliability for clinical use. However, because the visual inspection technique may be applied by a single examiner, we recommend its use to measure shoulder IR ROM in the clinical setting.

KW - Physical examination

KW - Range of motion

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Reliability and validity

KW - Shoulder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036712926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036712926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/apmr.2002.34815

DO - 10.1053/apmr.2002.34815

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 1229

EP - 1234

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 9

ER -