Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States

Results of a survey

J. Bingener, W. H. Schwesinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has been reported to be highly successful and cost-effective. It remains unknown to what extent the procedure is used in routine surgical practice. Methods: We conducted a survey of general surgeons practicing in a rural area of the United States. The type of practice, laparoscopic training, performance of cholangiography, and preferred approach to choledocholithiasis were elicited. Results: Sixty-eight of 207 surveys (33%) were returned. Thirty respondents (45%) indicated that they perform laparoscopic common bile duct explorations. The likelihood of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration increased with a higher number of cholecystectomies per year (p < 0.05, chi-square) but was independent of training or routine cholangiography. The preferred approach to a patient with choledocholithiasis was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (75%), followed by laparoscopic (21%) and open exploration (4%). Reasons for not performing laparoscopic exploration were time (58%), equipment (24%), good gastrointestinal backup (6%), reimbursement (3%), increased morbidity (1.5%), lack of skill (1.5%), and other/no reason (18%). Conclusion: Although 45% of practicing surgeons indicated that they perform laparoscopic common bile duct explorations, only 21% practiced it as their preferred approach. Time constraints and lack of equipment are the main factors preventing the application of the laparoscopic technique toward choledocholithiasis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)577-579
Number of pages3
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Common Bile Duct
Choledocholithiasis
Cholangiography
Equipment and Supplies
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Cholecystectomy
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Choledocholithiasis
  • Common bile duct exploration
  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
  • Laparoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States : Results of a survey. / Bingener, J.; Schwesinger, W. H.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 20, No. 4, 04.2006, p. 577-579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f7e4d30e1892442f81d7ca40abd1aef9,
title = "Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States: Results of a survey",
abstract = "Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has been reported to be highly successful and cost-effective. It remains unknown to what extent the procedure is used in routine surgical practice. Methods: We conducted a survey of general surgeons practicing in a rural area of the United States. The type of practice, laparoscopic training, performance of cholangiography, and preferred approach to choledocholithiasis were elicited. Results: Sixty-eight of 207 surveys (33{\%}) were returned. Thirty respondents (45{\%}) indicated that they perform laparoscopic common bile duct explorations. The likelihood of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration increased with a higher number of cholecystectomies per year (p < 0.05, chi-square) but was independent of training or routine cholangiography. The preferred approach to a patient with choledocholithiasis was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (75{\%}), followed by laparoscopic (21{\%}) and open exploration (4{\%}). Reasons for not performing laparoscopic exploration were time (58{\%}), equipment (24{\%}), good gastrointestinal backup (6{\%}), reimbursement (3{\%}), increased morbidity (1.5{\%}), lack of skill (1.5{\%}), and other/no reason (18{\%}). Conclusion: Although 45{\%} of practicing surgeons indicated that they perform laparoscopic common bile duct explorations, only 21{\%} practiced it as their preferred approach. Time constraints and lack of equipment are the main factors preventing the application of the laparoscopic technique toward choledocholithiasis.",
keywords = "Choledocholithiasis, Common bile duct exploration, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Laparoscopy",
author = "J. Bingener and Schwesinger, {W. H.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-005-0322-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "577--579",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States

T2 - Results of a survey

AU - Bingener, J.

AU - Schwesinger, W. H.

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has been reported to be highly successful and cost-effective. It remains unknown to what extent the procedure is used in routine surgical practice. Methods: We conducted a survey of general surgeons practicing in a rural area of the United States. The type of practice, laparoscopic training, performance of cholangiography, and preferred approach to choledocholithiasis were elicited. Results: Sixty-eight of 207 surveys (33%) were returned. Thirty respondents (45%) indicated that they perform laparoscopic common bile duct explorations. The likelihood of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration increased with a higher number of cholecystectomies per year (p < 0.05, chi-square) but was independent of training or routine cholangiography. The preferred approach to a patient with choledocholithiasis was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (75%), followed by laparoscopic (21%) and open exploration (4%). Reasons for not performing laparoscopic exploration were time (58%), equipment (24%), good gastrointestinal backup (6%), reimbursement (3%), increased morbidity (1.5%), lack of skill (1.5%), and other/no reason (18%). Conclusion: Although 45% of practicing surgeons indicated that they perform laparoscopic common bile duct explorations, only 21% practiced it as their preferred approach. Time constraints and lack of equipment are the main factors preventing the application of the laparoscopic technique toward choledocholithiasis.

AB - Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has been reported to be highly successful and cost-effective. It remains unknown to what extent the procedure is used in routine surgical practice. Methods: We conducted a survey of general surgeons practicing in a rural area of the United States. The type of practice, laparoscopic training, performance of cholangiography, and preferred approach to choledocholithiasis were elicited. Results: Sixty-eight of 207 surveys (33%) were returned. Thirty respondents (45%) indicated that they perform laparoscopic common bile duct explorations. The likelihood of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration increased with a higher number of cholecystectomies per year (p < 0.05, chi-square) but was independent of training or routine cholangiography. The preferred approach to a patient with choledocholithiasis was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (75%), followed by laparoscopic (21%) and open exploration (4%). Reasons for not performing laparoscopic exploration were time (58%), equipment (24%), good gastrointestinal backup (6%), reimbursement (3%), increased morbidity (1.5%), lack of skill (1.5%), and other/no reason (18%). Conclusion: Although 45% of practicing surgeons indicated that they perform laparoscopic common bile duct explorations, only 21% practiced it as their preferred approach. Time constraints and lack of equipment are the main factors preventing the application of the laparoscopic technique toward choledocholithiasis.

KW - Choledocholithiasis

KW - Common bile duct exploration

KW - Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

KW - Laparoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645732070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645732070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-005-0322-3

DO - 10.1007/s00464-005-0322-3

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 577

EP - 579

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 4

ER -