TY - JOUR
T1 - Launching the Next Steps to Improve Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellow Performance Assessment
T2 - A Look Back to the Initial Toolkit of Assessment Methods
AU - Morrison, Laura J.
AU - Periyakoil, Vyjeyanthi S.
AU - Arnold, Robert M.
AU - Tucker, Rodney
AU - Chittenden, Eva
AU - Sanchez-Reilly, Sandra
AU - Carey, Elise C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: The AAHPM Competencies Project, including all workgroup phases, was made possible by the Arthur Vining Davis Foundation and the Milbank Foundation for Rehabilitation . Dr. Periyakoil's time is funded by the following grants.
Funding Information:
The authors thank Susan D. Block, MD, for her vision and leadership in guiding the field forward through all phases of the project. The authors specifically wish to recognize and honor the contributions of our deceased colleague and mentor J. Andrew Billings, MD, pioneer in the field of hospice and palliative medicine and workgroup member for phases 1-3 of this work. The authors also wish to acknowledge the members of phase 1 and 2 Workgroups whose work led to the phase 3 Workgroup's development of the HPM Toolkit of Assessment Methods. With much appreciation, Dale Lupu, PhD, and Judy Opatik-Scott, MA, provided ongoing process and content support to the phase 3 Workgroup. Phase 3 Workgroup: Susan D. Block, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Laura J. Morrison, MD, Baylor College of Medicine and The Methodist Hospital Houston, TX, Robert Arnold, MD, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, PA, J. Andrew Billings, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital Palliative Care Service Boston, MA, Elise C. Carey, MD, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, Eva Chittenden, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital Palliative Care Service Boston, MA, VJ Periyakoil, MD, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA Sandra Sanchez-Reilly, MD, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, Rodney Tucker, MD University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Palliative Care, Birmingham, AL. Phase 1 and 2 Workgroups: Robert Arnold, MD, Section of Palliative Care & Medical Ethics University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, PA, J. Andrew Billings, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital Palliative Care Service Boston, MA, Susan D. Block, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, MA, Nathan Goldstein, MD, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Hertzberg Palliative Care Institute, New York, NY, Laura J. Morrison, MD, Baylor College of Medicine and The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, Tomasz Okon, MD, Marshfield Clinic Marshfield, WI, Sandra Sanchez-Reilly, MD, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, Rodney Tucker, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Palliative Care Birmingham, AL, James Tulsky, MD Center for Palliative Care, Duke University Medical Center Durham, NC, Charles von Gunten, MD, PhD, The Institute for Palliative Medicine at San Diego Hospice, San Diego, CA, David Weissman, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, Dale Lupu, PhD, American Board of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Silver Spring, MD. Funding: The AAHPM Competencies Project, including all workgroup phases, was made possible by the Arthur Vining Davis Foundation and the Milbank Foundation for Rehabilitation. Dr. Periyakoil's time is funded by the following grants. ? P30 AG059307/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States. ? R01 AG062239/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States. ? U54 MD010724/MD/NIMHD NIH HHS/United States. Dr. Arnold reports receiving personal fees from UptoDate, nonfinancial support from VitalTalk, and personal fees from AAHPM PC FACS, outside the submitted work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Education leaders in hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) have long acknowledged the challenge of fellow performance assessment and the need for HPM-specific fellow assessment tools. In 2010, and in alignment with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME's) directive toward competency-based medical education, the national HPM Competencies Workgroup curated a set of assessment tools, the HPM Toolkit of Assessment Methods. The Toolkit has been a resource for HPM fellowship directors in evolving practical, multifaceted fellow assessment strategies. Now, as American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine plans for a national workgroup in 2020 to define current HPM fellow assessment methods and to propose strategies to strengthen and standardize future assessment, the Toolkit provides a strong base from which to launch. However, the field learned important lessons from the 2010 Workgroup about the consensus process, gaps in areas of assessment, opportunities to address gaps with new or adapted tools, and limitations in implementing the Toolkit over time in terms of tracking, accessibility, and dissemination. This article describes the development of the Toolkit, including recommended tools and methods for assessment within each ACGME competency domain, and links the lessons learned to recommendations for the 2020 workgroup to consider in creating the next HPM assessment strategy and toolkit. Effective implementation will be crucial in supporting fellows to reach independent practice, which will further strengthen the field and workforce to provide the highest quality patient and family-centered care in serious illness. This will require an inspired, committed effort from the HPM community, which we enthusiastically anticipate.
AB - Education leaders in hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) have long acknowledged the challenge of fellow performance assessment and the need for HPM-specific fellow assessment tools. In 2010, and in alignment with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME's) directive toward competency-based medical education, the national HPM Competencies Workgroup curated a set of assessment tools, the HPM Toolkit of Assessment Methods. The Toolkit has been a resource for HPM fellowship directors in evolving practical, multifaceted fellow assessment strategies. Now, as American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine plans for a national workgroup in 2020 to define current HPM fellow assessment methods and to propose strategies to strengthen and standardize future assessment, the Toolkit provides a strong base from which to launch. However, the field learned important lessons from the 2010 Workgroup about the consensus process, gaps in areas of assessment, opportunities to address gaps with new or adapted tools, and limitations in implementing the Toolkit over time in terms of tracking, accessibility, and dissemination. This article describes the development of the Toolkit, including recommended tools and methods for assessment within each ACGME competency domain, and links the lessons learned to recommendations for the 2020 workgroup to consider in creating the next HPM assessment strategy and toolkit. Effective implementation will be crucial in supporting fellows to reach independent practice, which will further strengthen the field and workforce to provide the highest quality patient and family-centered care in serious illness. This will require an inspired, committed effort from the HPM community, which we enthusiastically anticipate.
KW - Hospice and palliative medicine fellowship
KW - assessment tools
KW - competency-based medical education
KW - graduate medical education
KW - palliative care training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097782776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097782776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 33091584
AN - SCOPUS:85097782776
SN - 0885-3924
VL - 61
SP - 613
EP - 627
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
IS - 3
ER -