Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy at the Mayo Clinic Arizona: Follow-up Surveillance of Positive Margin Disease

Premal J. Desai, Paul E. Andrews, Robert G. Ferrigni, Erik P Castle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: There is no consensus as to the management of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). A recent study revealed no evidence of malignancy in radical nephrectomy specimens removed for this reason, pointing out that a positive margin does not always translate to residual disease. We present results from our institution for the first 80 LPN performed with minimum 2 years' follow-up, focusing on patients with malignancy noted to have positive margin on final pathology. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review for patients who had undergone laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for malignancy and a minimal follow-up of 2 years. Patient demographic, operative, and perioperative data were collected. Those cases with positive margins were selected for specific oncologic analysis. Results: Of the 80 LPN performed, 50 were performed for malignancy. Mean tumor size was 2.2 cm. Five patients were found to have positive margin for renal cell carcinoma. All five of these masses were excised without hilar clamping using thermal dissection with energy ablation of the tumor bed. All patients underwent surveillance with a mean follow-up of 56.4 months with no recurrences. One patient with a negative surgical margin experienced a metachronous lesion in the contralateral kidney 3 years later. Conclusions: Surveillance in selected patients may be adequate without sacrificing oncologic control. However, long-term follow-up is essential. Hilar clamping may allow optimal visualization for tumor excision and allows excision to be performed without energy, potentially decreasing the rate of true- and false-positive margins.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-286
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Neoplasms
Constriction
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Dissection
Hot Temperature
Demography
Pathology
Kidney
Recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy at the Mayo Clinic Arizona : Follow-up Surveillance of Positive Margin Disease. / Desai, Premal J.; Andrews, Paul E.; Ferrigni, Robert G.; Castle, Erik P.

In: Urology, Vol. 71, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 283-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Desai, Premal J. ; Andrews, Paul E. ; Ferrigni, Robert G. ; Castle, Erik P. / Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy at the Mayo Clinic Arizona : Follow-up Surveillance of Positive Margin Disease. In: Urology. 2008 ; Vol. 71, No. 2. pp. 283-286.
@article{eddb4f792001406897b09b9e34812111,
title = "Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy at the Mayo Clinic Arizona: Follow-up Surveillance of Positive Margin Disease",
abstract = "Objectives: There is no consensus as to the management of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). A recent study revealed no evidence of malignancy in radical nephrectomy specimens removed for this reason, pointing out that a positive margin does not always translate to residual disease. We present results from our institution for the first 80 LPN performed with minimum 2 years' follow-up, focusing on patients with malignancy noted to have positive margin on final pathology. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review for patients who had undergone laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for malignancy and a minimal follow-up of 2 years. Patient demographic, operative, and perioperative data were collected. Those cases with positive margins were selected for specific oncologic analysis. Results: Of the 80 LPN performed, 50 were performed for malignancy. Mean tumor size was 2.2 cm. Five patients were found to have positive margin for renal cell carcinoma. All five of these masses were excised without hilar clamping using thermal dissection with energy ablation of the tumor bed. All patients underwent surveillance with a mean follow-up of 56.4 months with no recurrences. One patient with a negative surgical margin experienced a metachronous lesion in the contralateral kidney 3 years later. Conclusions: Surveillance in selected patients may be adequate without sacrificing oncologic control. However, long-term follow-up is essential. Hilar clamping may allow optimal visualization for tumor excision and allows excision to be performed without energy, potentially decreasing the rate of true- and false-positive margins.",
author = "Desai, {Premal J.} and Andrews, {Paul E.} and Ferrigni, {Robert G.} and Castle, {Erik P}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "283--286",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy at the Mayo Clinic Arizona

T2 - Follow-up Surveillance of Positive Margin Disease

AU - Desai, Premal J.

AU - Andrews, Paul E.

AU - Ferrigni, Robert G.

AU - Castle, Erik P

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - Objectives: There is no consensus as to the management of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). A recent study revealed no evidence of malignancy in radical nephrectomy specimens removed for this reason, pointing out that a positive margin does not always translate to residual disease. We present results from our institution for the first 80 LPN performed with minimum 2 years' follow-up, focusing on patients with malignancy noted to have positive margin on final pathology. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review for patients who had undergone laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for malignancy and a minimal follow-up of 2 years. Patient demographic, operative, and perioperative data were collected. Those cases with positive margins were selected for specific oncologic analysis. Results: Of the 80 LPN performed, 50 were performed for malignancy. Mean tumor size was 2.2 cm. Five patients were found to have positive margin for renal cell carcinoma. All five of these masses were excised without hilar clamping using thermal dissection with energy ablation of the tumor bed. All patients underwent surveillance with a mean follow-up of 56.4 months with no recurrences. One patient with a negative surgical margin experienced a metachronous lesion in the contralateral kidney 3 years later. Conclusions: Surveillance in selected patients may be adequate without sacrificing oncologic control. However, long-term follow-up is essential. Hilar clamping may allow optimal visualization for tumor excision and allows excision to be performed without energy, potentially decreasing the rate of true- and false-positive margins.

AB - Objectives: There is no consensus as to the management of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). A recent study revealed no evidence of malignancy in radical nephrectomy specimens removed for this reason, pointing out that a positive margin does not always translate to residual disease. We present results from our institution for the first 80 LPN performed with minimum 2 years' follow-up, focusing on patients with malignancy noted to have positive margin on final pathology. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review for patients who had undergone laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for malignancy and a minimal follow-up of 2 years. Patient demographic, operative, and perioperative data were collected. Those cases with positive margins were selected for specific oncologic analysis. Results: Of the 80 LPN performed, 50 were performed for malignancy. Mean tumor size was 2.2 cm. Five patients were found to have positive margin for renal cell carcinoma. All five of these masses were excised without hilar clamping using thermal dissection with energy ablation of the tumor bed. All patients underwent surveillance with a mean follow-up of 56.4 months with no recurrences. One patient with a negative surgical margin experienced a metachronous lesion in the contralateral kidney 3 years later. Conclusions: Surveillance in selected patients may be adequate without sacrificing oncologic control. However, long-term follow-up is essential. Hilar clamping may allow optimal visualization for tumor excision and allows excision to be performed without energy, potentially decreasing the rate of true- and false-positive margins.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39549085546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39549085546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.050

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.050

M3 - Article

C2 - 18308104

AN - SCOPUS:39549085546

VL - 71

SP - 283

EP - 286

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 2

ER -