Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Does splenic preservation affect outcomes?

Kristin L. Mekeel, Adyr A. Moss, Kunam Sudhakar Reddy, David C. Mulligan, Kristi L. Harold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the spleen is often routinely resected during both open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies, a splenectomy can increase the risk of postoperative and life-long infectious complications. Spleen-preserving laparoscopic pancreatectomies can technically be more difficult because of the delicate dissection of the splenic vessels. We performed a retrospective review of 34 laparoscopic pancreatectomies done at our institution. All procedures were done laparoscopically without hand assistance. Attempts were made in all patients to conserve the spleen, which was successful in 10 patients (29%). In the splenectomy group, 9 patients had 12 surgical complications (26%), which was statistically significant compared with the spleen-preserving group, in which there were no complications. This included 7 patients with a pancreatic leak (20%) and 3 with postoperative hemorrhage requiring reexploration (9%). Patients with spleen-preserving pancreatectomies had significantly less blood loss and shorter operative time compared with patients who underwent concomitant splenectomy. Splenic preservation should be attempted in all patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy unless there are overriding oncological or anatomic concerns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)362-365
Number of pages4
JournalSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Pancreatectomy
Spleen
Splenectomy
Postoperative Hemorrhage
Operative Time
Dissection
Hand

Keywords

  • laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
  • laparoscopic splenectomy
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • pancreatectomy
  • spleen-preserving

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy : Does splenic preservation affect outcomes? / Mekeel, Kristin L.; Moss, Adyr A.; Reddy, Kunam Sudhakar; Mulligan, David C.; Harold, Kristi L.

In: Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, Vol. 21, No. 5, 10.2011, p. 362-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mekeel, Kristin L. ; Moss, Adyr A. ; Reddy, Kunam Sudhakar ; Mulligan, David C. ; Harold, Kristi L. / Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy : Does splenic preservation affect outcomes?. In: Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 362-365.
@article{b2ea696a061e4570baf0b069775076ef,
title = "Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Does splenic preservation affect outcomes?",
abstract = "Although the spleen is often routinely resected during both open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies, a splenectomy can increase the risk of postoperative and life-long infectious complications. Spleen-preserving laparoscopic pancreatectomies can technically be more difficult because of the delicate dissection of the splenic vessels. We performed a retrospective review of 34 laparoscopic pancreatectomies done at our institution. All procedures were done laparoscopically without hand assistance. Attempts were made in all patients to conserve the spleen, which was successful in 10 patients (29{\%}). In the splenectomy group, 9 patients had 12 surgical complications (26{\%}), which was statistically significant compared with the spleen-preserving group, in which there were no complications. This included 7 patients with a pancreatic leak (20{\%}) and 3 with postoperative hemorrhage requiring reexploration (9{\%}). Patients with spleen-preserving pancreatectomies had significantly less blood loss and shorter operative time compared with patients who underwent concomitant splenectomy. Splenic preservation should be attempted in all patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy unless there are overriding oncological or anatomic concerns.",
keywords = "laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic splenectomy, minimally invasive surgery, pancreatectomy, spleen-preserving",
author = "Mekeel, {Kristin L.} and Moss, {Adyr A.} and Reddy, {Kunam Sudhakar} and Mulligan, {David C.} and Harold, {Kristi L.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822e0ea8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "362--365",
journal = "Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques",
issn = "1051-7200",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

T2 - Does splenic preservation affect outcomes?

AU - Mekeel, Kristin L.

AU - Moss, Adyr A.

AU - Reddy, Kunam Sudhakar

AU - Mulligan, David C.

AU - Harold, Kristi L.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Although the spleen is often routinely resected during both open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies, a splenectomy can increase the risk of postoperative and life-long infectious complications. Spleen-preserving laparoscopic pancreatectomies can technically be more difficult because of the delicate dissection of the splenic vessels. We performed a retrospective review of 34 laparoscopic pancreatectomies done at our institution. All procedures were done laparoscopically without hand assistance. Attempts were made in all patients to conserve the spleen, which was successful in 10 patients (29%). In the splenectomy group, 9 patients had 12 surgical complications (26%), which was statistically significant compared with the spleen-preserving group, in which there were no complications. This included 7 patients with a pancreatic leak (20%) and 3 with postoperative hemorrhage requiring reexploration (9%). Patients with spleen-preserving pancreatectomies had significantly less blood loss and shorter operative time compared with patients who underwent concomitant splenectomy. Splenic preservation should be attempted in all patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy unless there are overriding oncological or anatomic concerns.

AB - Although the spleen is often routinely resected during both open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies, a splenectomy can increase the risk of postoperative and life-long infectious complications. Spleen-preserving laparoscopic pancreatectomies can technically be more difficult because of the delicate dissection of the splenic vessels. We performed a retrospective review of 34 laparoscopic pancreatectomies done at our institution. All procedures were done laparoscopically without hand assistance. Attempts were made in all patients to conserve the spleen, which was successful in 10 patients (29%). In the splenectomy group, 9 patients had 12 surgical complications (26%), which was statistically significant compared with the spleen-preserving group, in which there were no complications. This included 7 patients with a pancreatic leak (20%) and 3 with postoperative hemorrhage requiring reexploration (9%). Patients with spleen-preserving pancreatectomies had significantly less blood loss and shorter operative time compared with patients who underwent concomitant splenectomy. Splenic preservation should be attempted in all patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy unless there are overriding oncological or anatomic concerns.

KW - laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

KW - laparoscopic splenectomy

KW - minimally invasive surgery

KW - pancreatectomy

KW - spleen-preserving

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054885914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054885914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822e0ea8

DO - 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822e0ea8

M3 - Article

C2 - 22002275

AN - SCOPUS:80054885914

VL - 21

SP - 362

EP - 365

JO - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

JF - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

SN - 1051-7200

IS - 5

ER -