Knowledge of human papillomavirus: Differences by self-reported treatment for genital warts and sociodemographic characteristics

Jill Koshiol, Lila Finney Rutten, Richard P. Moser, Nicola Hesse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate knowledge about human papillomavirus (HPV) in individuals with genital warts compared with women from the general population without genital warts. Human papillomavirus (HPV) knowledge among women reporting treatment for genital warts compared with HPV knowledge in women reporting no treatment was assessed using data from the population-based 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Three percent (N=97) of women answered yes and 97% (N=3,450) no to Have you ever been treated for venereal warts or condyloma? Women who reported treatment for genital warts, were more likely to have heard of HPV (odds ratio (OR): 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-4.2 vs. no or don't know), to have been told they had HPV (OR: 24.5, 95% CI: 11.4-52.8), and to have accurate information about HPV, such as HPV causes cancer (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.8-4.3). A large proportion (41%) of women who reported treatment for genital warts, however, had not heard of HPV. These women tended to be older, poorer, less educated, non-Hispanic Black, less likely to have had a recent Pap test, and divorced, widowed, or separated. Women with genital warts are learning about HPV, but socioeconomically disadvantaged groups may need to be targeted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-345
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of health communication
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Knowledge of human papillomavirus: Differences by self-reported treatment for genital warts and sociodemographic characteristics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this