Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether preplacement recommendations following an occupationally focused medical history is different from those following an occupational consultation. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 172 applicants to our institution. Results: Following provider review of occupational history survey alone, none of the applicants had restrictions recommended. In comparison, only 163 applicants (94.7%) were recommended to be hired without restrictions following provider review of the same patient's occupational history and examination (P = 0.0078). Conclusion: A well-designed questionnaire is useful for screening applicants for preplacement examinations and assures sufficient detail to allow for a large proportion of individuals to proceed to employment without an occupational examination. However, in this study, a small but statistically significant portion (5%) of applicants required occupational examinations for appropriate work recommendations.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 276-279 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1 2012 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health