Intraoperative Margin Management in Breast-Conserving Surgery

A Systematic Review of the Literature

Richard J. Gray, Barbara A Pockaj, Erin Garvey, Sarah Blair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Breast surgeons have a wide variety of intraoperative techniques available to help achieve low rates for positive margins of excision, with variable levels of evidence. Methods: A systematic review of the medical literature from 1995 to July 2016 was conducted, with 434 abstracts identified and evaluated. The analysis included 106 papers focused on intraoperative management of breast cancer margins and contained actionable data. Results: Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable tumors, as an alternative to palpation guidance, can lower positive margin rates, but the effect when used as an alternative to wire localization (WL) for nonpalpable tumors is less certain. Localization techniques such as radioactive seed localization and radioguided occult lesion localization were found potentially to lower positive margin rates as alternatives to WL depending on baseline positive margin rates. Intraoperative pathologic methods including gross histology, frozen section analysis, and imprint cytology all have the potential to lower the rates of positive margins. Cavity-shave margins and the Marginprobe device both lower rates of positive margins, with some potential for negative cosmetic effects. Specimen radiography and multiple miscellaneous techniques did not affect positive margin rates or provided too little evidence for formation of a conclusion. Conclusions: A systematic review of the literature showed evidence that several intraoperative techniques and actions can lower the rates of positive margins. These results are presented together with graded recommendations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 5 2017

Fingerprint

Segmental Mastectomy
Palpation
Frozen Sections
Radiography
Cosmetics
Cell Biology
Neoplasms
Seeds
Histology
Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Equipment and Supplies
Surgeons
Margins of Excision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Intraoperative Margin Management in Breast-Conserving Surgery : A Systematic Review of the Literature. / Gray, Richard J.; Pockaj, Barbara A; Garvey, Erin; Blair, Sarah.

In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, 05.01.2017, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{57adfd24d78948cda24e96e6510000b4,
title = "Intraoperative Margin Management in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature",
abstract = "Background: Breast surgeons have a wide variety of intraoperative techniques available to help achieve low rates for positive margins of excision, with variable levels of evidence. Methods: A systematic review of the medical literature from 1995 to July 2016 was conducted, with 434 abstracts identified and evaluated. The analysis included 106 papers focused on intraoperative management of breast cancer margins and contained actionable data. Results: Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable tumors, as an alternative to palpation guidance, can lower positive margin rates, but the effect when used as an alternative to wire localization (WL) for nonpalpable tumors is less certain. Localization techniques such as radioactive seed localization and radioguided occult lesion localization were found potentially to lower positive margin rates as alternatives to WL depending on baseline positive margin rates. Intraoperative pathologic methods including gross histology, frozen section analysis, and imprint cytology all have the potential to lower the rates of positive margins. Cavity-shave margins and the Marginprobe device both lower rates of positive margins, with some potential for negative cosmetic effects. Specimen radiography and multiple miscellaneous techniques did not affect positive margin rates or provided too little evidence for formation of a conclusion. Conclusions: A systematic review of the literature showed evidence that several intraoperative techniques and actions can lower the rates of positive margins. These results are presented together with graded recommendations.",
author = "Gray, {Richard J.} and Pockaj, {Barbara A} and Erin Garvey and Sarah Blair",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1245/s10434-016-5756-4",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Annals of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraoperative Margin Management in Breast-Conserving Surgery

T2 - A Systematic Review of the Literature

AU - Gray, Richard J.

AU - Pockaj, Barbara A

AU - Garvey, Erin

AU - Blair, Sarah

PY - 2017/1/5

Y1 - 2017/1/5

N2 - Background: Breast surgeons have a wide variety of intraoperative techniques available to help achieve low rates for positive margins of excision, with variable levels of evidence. Methods: A systematic review of the medical literature from 1995 to July 2016 was conducted, with 434 abstracts identified and evaluated. The analysis included 106 papers focused on intraoperative management of breast cancer margins and contained actionable data. Results: Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable tumors, as an alternative to palpation guidance, can lower positive margin rates, but the effect when used as an alternative to wire localization (WL) for nonpalpable tumors is less certain. Localization techniques such as radioactive seed localization and radioguided occult lesion localization were found potentially to lower positive margin rates as alternatives to WL depending on baseline positive margin rates. Intraoperative pathologic methods including gross histology, frozen section analysis, and imprint cytology all have the potential to lower the rates of positive margins. Cavity-shave margins and the Marginprobe device both lower rates of positive margins, with some potential for negative cosmetic effects. Specimen radiography and multiple miscellaneous techniques did not affect positive margin rates or provided too little evidence for formation of a conclusion. Conclusions: A systematic review of the literature showed evidence that several intraoperative techniques and actions can lower the rates of positive margins. These results are presented together with graded recommendations.

AB - Background: Breast surgeons have a wide variety of intraoperative techniques available to help achieve low rates for positive margins of excision, with variable levels of evidence. Methods: A systematic review of the medical literature from 1995 to July 2016 was conducted, with 434 abstracts identified and evaluated. The analysis included 106 papers focused on intraoperative management of breast cancer margins and contained actionable data. Results: Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable tumors, as an alternative to palpation guidance, can lower positive margin rates, but the effect when used as an alternative to wire localization (WL) for nonpalpable tumors is less certain. Localization techniques such as radioactive seed localization and radioguided occult lesion localization were found potentially to lower positive margin rates as alternatives to WL depending on baseline positive margin rates. Intraoperative pathologic methods including gross histology, frozen section analysis, and imprint cytology all have the potential to lower the rates of positive margins. Cavity-shave margins and the Marginprobe device both lower rates of positive margins, with some potential for negative cosmetic effects. Specimen radiography and multiple miscellaneous techniques did not affect positive margin rates or provided too little evidence for formation of a conclusion. Conclusions: A systematic review of the literature showed evidence that several intraoperative techniques and actions can lower the rates of positive margins. These results are presented together with graded recommendations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008500446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008500446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-016-5756-4

DO - 10.1245/s10434-016-5756-4

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology

JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology

SN - 1068-9265

ER -