Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular massfollowing aortic valve replacement

E. K W Sim, T. A. Orszulak, Hartzell V Schaff, C. Shub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current surgical practice regarding valve replacement has as its primary concern the appropriateness of tissueversus mechanical prostheses and perhaps lesser emphasis has been placed on the size of the device. Despite technical advances, which provide maximal valve orifice area in valve substitutes, small device implantation may be accomplished in the aortic root but not effectively relieve the obstructive nature of the original disease. We reviewed 39 patients who had undergone aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) and had preoperative and postoperative (6 months-3 years) echo measurements which permitted calculation of the left ventricular mass (LVM) and mass index (LVMI). The mean age for the 32 women and 7 men was 67.4 years (22-83). There were four groups as determined by prosthetic size and aortic root enlargement (ARE) or not. The majority of the prostheses were heterografts (26), and the others were tilting discs or bileaflet. There was no difference (P = ns) in preoperative NYHA class, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, cross-clamp time, associated procedures or complications among the four groups. Although all groups demonstrated a reduction in LVM and LVMI, there was a greater and equal mass and mass index reduction in patients receiving a 21 mm prosthesis or larger. Despite the refinements in artificial valve designs, the 19 mm size valves may not provide comparable reduction in LVM and LVMI following AVR for AS, and the aortic root enlargement permits a larger prosthetic implantation and greater potential for reduction in LVM and LVMI without an increase in the operative time or postoperative complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-297
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Volume8
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Aortic Valve
Prostheses and Implants
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Equipment and Supplies
Operative Time
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Heterografts

Keywords

  • Aortic root enlargement
  • Aortic stenosis
  • Aortic valve replacement
  • Left ventricular mass
  • Left ventricular mass index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular massfollowing aortic valve replacement. / Sim, E. K W; Orszulak, T. A.; Schaff, Hartzell V; Shub, C.

In: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Vol. 8, No. 6, 1994, p. 293-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b58b06cab56d4f579cfbe5b9af2ae7fd,
title = "Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular massfollowing aortic valve replacement",
abstract = "Current surgical practice regarding valve replacement has as its primary concern the appropriateness of tissueversus mechanical prostheses and perhaps lesser emphasis has been placed on the size of the device. Despite technical advances, which provide maximal valve orifice area in valve substitutes, small device implantation may be accomplished in the aortic root but not effectively relieve the obstructive nature of the original disease. We reviewed 39 patients who had undergone aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) and had preoperative and postoperative (6 months-3 years) echo measurements which permitted calculation of the left ventricular mass (LVM) and mass index (LVMI). The mean age for the 32 women and 7 men was 67.4 years (22-83). There were four groups as determined by prosthetic size and aortic root enlargement (ARE) or not. The majority of the prostheses were heterografts (26), and the others were tilting discs or bileaflet. There was no difference (P = ns) in preoperative NYHA class, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, cross-clamp time, associated procedures or complications among the four groups. Although all groups demonstrated a reduction in LVM and LVMI, there was a greater and equal mass and mass index reduction in patients receiving a 21 mm prosthesis or larger. Despite the refinements in artificial valve designs, the 19 mm size valves may not provide comparable reduction in LVM and LVMI following AVR for AS, and the aortic root enlargement permits a larger prosthetic implantation and greater potential for reduction in LVM and LVMI without an increase in the operative time or postoperative complications.",
keywords = "Aortic root enlargement, Aortic stenosis, Aortic valve replacement, Left ventricular mass, Left ventricular mass index",
author = "Sim, {E. K W} and Orszulak, {T. A.} and Schaff, {Hartzell V} and C. Shub",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "293--297",
journal = "European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery",
issn = "1010-7940",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular massfollowing aortic valve replacement

AU - Sim, E. K W

AU - Orszulak, T. A.

AU - Schaff, Hartzell V

AU - Shub, C.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Current surgical practice regarding valve replacement has as its primary concern the appropriateness of tissueversus mechanical prostheses and perhaps lesser emphasis has been placed on the size of the device. Despite technical advances, which provide maximal valve orifice area in valve substitutes, small device implantation may be accomplished in the aortic root but not effectively relieve the obstructive nature of the original disease. We reviewed 39 patients who had undergone aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) and had preoperative and postoperative (6 months-3 years) echo measurements which permitted calculation of the left ventricular mass (LVM) and mass index (LVMI). The mean age for the 32 women and 7 men was 67.4 years (22-83). There were four groups as determined by prosthetic size and aortic root enlargement (ARE) or not. The majority of the prostheses were heterografts (26), and the others were tilting discs or bileaflet. There was no difference (P = ns) in preoperative NYHA class, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, cross-clamp time, associated procedures or complications among the four groups. Although all groups demonstrated a reduction in LVM and LVMI, there was a greater and equal mass and mass index reduction in patients receiving a 21 mm prosthesis or larger. Despite the refinements in artificial valve designs, the 19 mm size valves may not provide comparable reduction in LVM and LVMI following AVR for AS, and the aortic root enlargement permits a larger prosthetic implantation and greater potential for reduction in LVM and LVMI without an increase in the operative time or postoperative complications.

AB - Current surgical practice regarding valve replacement has as its primary concern the appropriateness of tissueversus mechanical prostheses and perhaps lesser emphasis has been placed on the size of the device. Despite technical advances, which provide maximal valve orifice area in valve substitutes, small device implantation may be accomplished in the aortic root but not effectively relieve the obstructive nature of the original disease. We reviewed 39 patients who had undergone aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) and had preoperative and postoperative (6 months-3 years) echo measurements which permitted calculation of the left ventricular mass (LVM) and mass index (LVMI). The mean age for the 32 women and 7 men was 67.4 years (22-83). There were four groups as determined by prosthetic size and aortic root enlargement (ARE) or not. The majority of the prostheses were heterografts (26), and the others were tilting discs or bileaflet. There was no difference (P = ns) in preoperative NYHA class, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, cross-clamp time, associated procedures or complications among the four groups. Although all groups demonstrated a reduction in LVM and LVMI, there was a greater and equal mass and mass index reduction in patients receiving a 21 mm prosthesis or larger. Despite the refinements in artificial valve designs, the 19 mm size valves may not provide comparable reduction in LVM and LVMI following AVR for AS, and the aortic root enlargement permits a larger prosthetic implantation and greater potential for reduction in LVM and LVMI without an increase in the operative time or postoperative complications.

KW - Aortic root enlargement

KW - Aortic stenosis

KW - Aortic valve replacement

KW - Left ventricular mass

KW - Left ventricular mass index

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028249325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028249325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 293

EP - 297

JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

SN - 1010-7940

IS - 6

ER -