Induction versus no induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a multicentre randomised phase II trial (NCCTG N0849 [Alliance])

Harry H. Yoon, Fang Shu Ou, Gamini S. Soori, Qian Shi, Dennis A. Wigle, Robert P. Sticca, Robert Clell Miller, James L. Leenstra, Patrick J. Peller, Brenda Ginos, Erica Heying, Tsung Teh Wu, Timothy F. Drevyanko, Stephen Ko, Bassam Ibrahim Mattar, Daniel A. Nikcevich, Robert J. Behrens, Maged F. Khalil, George P. Kim, Steven R. Alberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: report primary results from the first multicentre randomised trial evaluating induction chemotherapy prior to trimodality therapy in patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Notably, recent data from a single-institution randomised trial reported that induction chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours. Methods: In this phase 2 trial (28 centres in the U.S. NCI-sponsored North Central Cancer Treatment Group [Alliance]), trimodality-eligible patients (T3-4N0, TanyN+) were randomised to receive induction (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine; Arm A) or no induction chemotherapy (Arm B) followed by oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/radiation and subsequent surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathologic complete response (pathCR). Secondary/exploratory endpoints were OS and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Of 55 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, the pathCR rate was 28.6% (8/28) in A versus 40.7% (11/27) in B (P = .34). Given interim results indicating futility, accrual was terminated, but patients were followed. After a median follow-up of 60.4 months, a longer median OS in Arm A versus B was unexpectedly observed (3-year rates 57.1% versus 41.7%, respectively) driven by longer DFS after margin-free surgery. In posthoc analysis, induction (versus no induction) chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer OS and DFS among patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours, but not among patients with poorly/undifferentiated tumours (Pinteraction = 0.037). Conclusions: Adding induction chemotherapy prior to trimodality therapy did not improve the primary endpoint, pathCR. However, induction chemotherapy was associated with longer median OS, particularly among patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours. These findings may inform further development of curative-intent trials in this disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)214-223
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume150
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • Esophageal adenocarcinoma
  • Gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma
  • Radiation
  • Surgery
  • Trimodality therapy
  • esophagectomy
  • nduction chemotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Induction versus no induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a multicentre randomised phase II trial (NCCTG N0849 [Alliance])'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this