Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program

Jennifer A. Schlichting, Michelle A. Mengeling, Nader M. Makki, Ashish Malhotra, Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, J. Stacey Klutts, Barcey T. Levy, Peter J. Kaboli, Mary E. Charlton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned (27.43 vs. 44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)239-247
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Community Health
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Telephone
telephone
Colorectal Neoplasms
cancer
Costs and Cost Analysis
participation
costs
Population
Veterans
Colonoscopy
Health Personnel
wage costs
rural area
Group
contact
health care
evidence

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer screening
  • Cost comparison
  • Fecal immunochemical test
  • Intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Schlichting, J. A., Mengeling, M. A., Makki, N. M., Malhotra, A., Halfdanarson, T. R., Klutts, J. S., ... Charlton, M. E. (2014). Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program. Journal of Community Health, 39(2), 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population : Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program. / Schlichting, Jennifer A.; Mengeling, Michelle A.; Makki, Nader M.; Malhotra, Ashish; Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R.; Klutts, J. Stacey; Levy, Barcey T.; Kaboli, Peter J.; Charlton, Mary E.

In: Journal of Community Health, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2014, p. 239-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schlichting, JA, Mengeling, MA, Makki, NM, Malhotra, A, Halfdanarson, TR, Klutts, JS, Levy, BT, Kaboli, PJ & Charlton, ME 2014, 'Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program', Journal of Community Health, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1
Schlichting, Jennifer A. ; Mengeling, Michelle A. ; Makki, Nader M. ; Malhotra, Ashish ; Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R. ; Klutts, J. Stacey ; Levy, Barcey T. ; Kaboli, Peter J. ; Charlton, Mary E. / Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population : Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program. In: Journal of Community Health. 2014 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 239-247.
@article{4d22cba3b522411bba20a4beebe5b75d,
title = "Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program",
abstract = "Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 {\%}), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 {\%}). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned (27.43 vs. 44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.",
keywords = "Colorectal cancer screening, Cost comparison, Fecal immunochemical test, Intervention",
author = "Schlichting, {Jennifer A.} and Mengeling, {Michelle A.} and Makki, {Nader M.} and Ashish Malhotra and Halfdanarson, {Thorvardur R.} and Klutts, {J. Stacey} and Levy, {Barcey T.} and Kaboli, {Peter J.} and Charlton, {Mary E.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "239--247",
journal = "Journal of Community Health",
issn = "0094-5145",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population

T2 - Participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a fit mailing program

AU - Schlichting, Jennifer A.

AU - Mengeling, Michelle A.

AU - Makki, Nader M.

AU - Malhotra, Ashish

AU - Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R.

AU - Klutts, J. Stacey

AU - Levy, Barcey T.

AU - Kaboli, Peter J.

AU - Charlton, Mary E.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned (27.43 vs. 44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.

AB - Many people who live in rural areas face distance barriers to colonoscopy. Our previous study demonstrated the utility of mailing fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to average risk patients overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC screening). The aims of this study were to determine if introductory and reminder telephone calls would increase the proportion of returned FITs as well as to compare costs. Average risk patients overdue for CRC screening received a high intensity intervention (HII), which included an introductory telephone call to see if they were interested in taking a FIT prior to mailing the test out and reminder phone calls if the FIT was not returned. This HII group was compared to our previous low intensity intervention (LII) where a FIT was mailed to a similar group of veterans with no telephone contact. While a higher proportion of eligible respondents returned FITs in the LII (92 vs. 45 %), there was a much higher proportion of FITs returned out of those mailed in the HII (85 vs. 14 %). The fewer wasted FITs in the HII led to it having lower cost per FIT returned (27.43 vs. 44.86). Given that either intervention is a feasible approach for patients overdue for CRC screening, health care providers should consider offering FITs using a home-based mailing program along with other evidence-based CRC screening options to average risk patients. Factors such as location, patient population, FIT cost and reimbursement, and personnel costs need to be considered when deciding the most effective way to implement FIT screening.

KW - Colorectal cancer screening

KW - Cost comparison

KW - Fecal immunochemical test

KW - Intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896397304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896397304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

DO - 10.1007/s10900-014-9830-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 24499966

AN - SCOPUS:84896397304

VL - 39

SP - 239

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Community Health

JF - Journal of Community Health

SN - 0094-5145

IS - 2

ER -