TY - JOUR
T1 - In search of the facts
T2 - Evidence-based medicine through the ages
AU - Jones, Trahern W.
AU - West, Colin P.
AU - Newman, James S.
PY - 2011/5/1
Y1 - 2011/5/1
N2 - Evidence-based medicine (EBM), defined as "the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients," is often seen as a 20th-century revelation. In fact, its roots extend deeply into the history of the healing arts. Modern attempts at making clinical decisions are increasingly based on scientific peerreviewed literature supported by the tenets of EBM. However, physicians throughout history have had to decide how to treat patients with their clinical decisions guided by the "evidence" of the time, which in many cases was limited by dominant theories of pathophysiology. In later eras, the advent of statistics and organized data collection allowed for the modern shape of EBM to evolve. We illustrate how EBM has reflected the changing scientific paradigms on which medicine is founded and urge practitioners and researchers to consider which paradigms may limit their own interpretations and concepts of evidence.
AB - Evidence-based medicine (EBM), defined as "the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients," is often seen as a 20th-century revelation. In fact, its roots extend deeply into the history of the healing arts. Modern attempts at making clinical decisions are increasingly based on scientific peerreviewed literature supported by the tenets of EBM. However, physicians throughout history have had to decide how to treat patients with their clinical decisions guided by the "evidence" of the time, which in many cases was limited by dominant theories of pathophysiology. In later eras, the advent of statistics and organized data collection allowed for the modern shape of EBM to evolve. We illustrate how EBM has reflected the changing scientific paradigms on which medicine is founded and urge practitioners and researchers to consider which paradigms may limit their own interpretations and concepts of evidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957501650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957501650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:79957501650
SN - 1079-6533
VL - 18
SP - 205
EP - 210
JO - Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
JF - Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management
IS - 5
ER -