Implementation and impact of ICD-10 (Part II)

Gazanfar Rahmathulla, H. Gordon Deen, Judith A. Dokken, Stephen M. Pirris, Mark A. Pichelmann, Eric W. Nottmeier, Ronald Reimer, Robert E. Wharen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The transition from the International Classification of Disease-9 th clinical modification to the new ICD-10 was all set to occur on 1 October 2015. The American Medical Association has previously been successful in delaying the transition by over 10 years and has been able to further postpone its introduction to 2015. The new system will overcome many of the limitations present in the older version, thus paving the way to more accurate capture of clinical information. Methods: The benefits of the new ICD-10 system include improved quality of care, potential cost savings, reduction of unpaid claims, and improved tracking of healthcare data. The areas where challenges will be evident include planning and implementation, the cost to transition, a shortage of qualified coders, training and education of the healthcare workforce, and a loss of productivity when this occurs. The impacts include substantial costs to the healthcare system, but the projected long-term savings and benefits will be significant. Improved fraud detection, accurate data entry, ability to analyze cost benefits with procedures, and enhanced quality outcome measures are the most significant beneficial factors with this change. Results: The present Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code sets will be used for reporting ambulatory procedures in the same manner as they have been. ICD-10-PCS will replace ICD-9 procedure codes for inpatient hospital services. The ICD-10-CM will replace the clinical code sets. Our article will focus on the challenges to execution of an ICD change and strategies to minimize risk while transitioning to the new system. Conclusion: With the implementation deadline gradually approaching, spine surgery practices that include multidisciplinary health specialists have to anticipate and prepare for the ICD change in order to mitigate risk. Education and communication is the key to this process in spine practices. Copyright:

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSurgical Neurology International
Volume5
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

International Classification of Diseases
Delivery of Health Care
Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System
Spine
Current Procedural Terminology
Fraud
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Aptitude
Cost Savings
Quality of Health Care
American Medical Association
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Inpatients
Communication
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Efficiency
Health

Keywords

  • Diagnostic coding systems
  • implementation
  • International Classification of Disease version 10
  • practice management
  • spine surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Rahmathulla, G., Deen, H. G., Dokken, J. A., Pirris, S. M., Pichelmann, M. A., Nottmeier, E. W., ... Wharen, R. E. (2014). Implementation and impact of ICD-10 (Part II). Surgical Neurology International, 5(SUPPL. 3). https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.137182

Implementation and impact of ICD-10 (Part II). / Rahmathulla, Gazanfar; Deen, H. Gordon; Dokken, Judith A.; Pirris, Stephen M.; Pichelmann, Mark A.; Nottmeier, Eric W.; Reimer, Ronald; Wharen, Robert E.

In: Surgical Neurology International, Vol. 5, No. SUPPL. 3, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rahmathulla, G, Deen, HG, Dokken, JA, Pirris, SM, Pichelmann, MA, Nottmeier, EW, Reimer, R & Wharen, RE 2014, 'Implementation and impact of ICD-10 (Part II)', Surgical Neurology International, vol. 5, no. SUPPL. 3. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.137182
Rahmathulla G, Deen HG, Dokken JA, Pirris SM, Pichelmann MA, Nottmeier EW et al. Implementation and impact of ICD-10 (Part II). Surgical Neurology International. 2014;5(SUPPL. 3). https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.137182
Rahmathulla, Gazanfar ; Deen, H. Gordon ; Dokken, Judith A. ; Pirris, Stephen M. ; Pichelmann, Mark A. ; Nottmeier, Eric W. ; Reimer, Ronald ; Wharen, Robert E. / Implementation and impact of ICD-10 (Part II). In: Surgical Neurology International. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. SUPPL. 3.
@article{c5a63549ed964ed7bde31f4759787ef3,
title = "Implementation and impact of ICD-10 (Part II)",
abstract = "Background: The transition from the International Classification of Disease-9 th clinical modification to the new ICD-10 was all set to occur on 1 October 2015. The American Medical Association has previously been successful in delaying the transition by over 10 years and has been able to further postpone its introduction to 2015. The new system will overcome many of the limitations present in the older version, thus paving the way to more accurate capture of clinical information. Methods: The benefits of the new ICD-10 system include improved quality of care, potential cost savings, reduction of unpaid claims, and improved tracking of healthcare data. The areas where challenges will be evident include planning and implementation, the cost to transition, a shortage of qualified coders, training and education of the healthcare workforce, and a loss of productivity when this occurs. The impacts include substantial costs to the healthcare system, but the projected long-term savings and benefits will be significant. Improved fraud detection, accurate data entry, ability to analyze cost benefits with procedures, and enhanced quality outcome measures are the most significant beneficial factors with this change. Results: The present Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code sets will be used for reporting ambulatory procedures in the same manner as they have been. ICD-10-PCS will replace ICD-9 procedure codes for inpatient hospital services. The ICD-10-CM will replace the clinical code sets. Our article will focus on the challenges to execution of an ICD change and strategies to minimize risk while transitioning to the new system. Conclusion: With the implementation deadline gradually approaching, spine surgery practices that include multidisciplinary health specialists have to anticipate and prepare for the ICD change in order to mitigate risk. Education and communication is the key to this process in spine practices. Copyright:",
keywords = "Diagnostic coding systems, implementation, International Classification of Disease version 10, practice management, spine surgery",
author = "Gazanfar Rahmathulla and Deen, {H. Gordon} and Dokken, {Judith A.} and Pirris, {Stephen M.} and Pichelmann, {Mark A.} and Nottmeier, {Eric W.} and Ronald Reimer and Wharen, {Robert E.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.4103/2152-7806.137182",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Surgical Neurology International",
issn = "2152-7806",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "SUPPL. 3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation and impact of ICD-10 (Part II)

AU - Rahmathulla, Gazanfar

AU - Deen, H. Gordon

AU - Dokken, Judith A.

AU - Pirris, Stephen M.

AU - Pichelmann, Mark A.

AU - Nottmeier, Eric W.

AU - Reimer, Ronald

AU - Wharen, Robert E.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: The transition from the International Classification of Disease-9 th clinical modification to the new ICD-10 was all set to occur on 1 October 2015. The American Medical Association has previously been successful in delaying the transition by over 10 years and has been able to further postpone its introduction to 2015. The new system will overcome many of the limitations present in the older version, thus paving the way to more accurate capture of clinical information. Methods: The benefits of the new ICD-10 system include improved quality of care, potential cost savings, reduction of unpaid claims, and improved tracking of healthcare data. The areas where challenges will be evident include planning and implementation, the cost to transition, a shortage of qualified coders, training and education of the healthcare workforce, and a loss of productivity when this occurs. The impacts include substantial costs to the healthcare system, but the projected long-term savings and benefits will be significant. Improved fraud detection, accurate data entry, ability to analyze cost benefits with procedures, and enhanced quality outcome measures are the most significant beneficial factors with this change. Results: The present Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code sets will be used for reporting ambulatory procedures in the same manner as they have been. ICD-10-PCS will replace ICD-9 procedure codes for inpatient hospital services. The ICD-10-CM will replace the clinical code sets. Our article will focus on the challenges to execution of an ICD change and strategies to minimize risk while transitioning to the new system. Conclusion: With the implementation deadline gradually approaching, spine surgery practices that include multidisciplinary health specialists have to anticipate and prepare for the ICD change in order to mitigate risk. Education and communication is the key to this process in spine practices. Copyright:

AB - Background: The transition from the International Classification of Disease-9 th clinical modification to the new ICD-10 was all set to occur on 1 October 2015. The American Medical Association has previously been successful in delaying the transition by over 10 years and has been able to further postpone its introduction to 2015. The new system will overcome many of the limitations present in the older version, thus paving the way to more accurate capture of clinical information. Methods: The benefits of the new ICD-10 system include improved quality of care, potential cost savings, reduction of unpaid claims, and improved tracking of healthcare data. The areas where challenges will be evident include planning and implementation, the cost to transition, a shortage of qualified coders, training and education of the healthcare workforce, and a loss of productivity when this occurs. The impacts include substantial costs to the healthcare system, but the projected long-term savings and benefits will be significant. Improved fraud detection, accurate data entry, ability to analyze cost benefits with procedures, and enhanced quality outcome measures are the most significant beneficial factors with this change. Results: The present Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code sets will be used for reporting ambulatory procedures in the same manner as they have been. ICD-10-PCS will replace ICD-9 procedure codes for inpatient hospital services. The ICD-10-CM will replace the clinical code sets. Our article will focus on the challenges to execution of an ICD change and strategies to minimize risk while transitioning to the new system. Conclusion: With the implementation deadline gradually approaching, spine surgery practices that include multidisciplinary health specialists have to anticipate and prepare for the ICD change in order to mitigate risk. Education and communication is the key to this process in spine practices. Copyright:

KW - Diagnostic coding systems

KW - implementation

KW - International Classification of Disease version 10

KW - practice management

KW - spine surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906834895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906834895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/2152-7806.137182

DO - 10.4103/2152-7806.137182

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84906834895

VL - 5

JO - Surgical Neurology International

JF - Surgical Neurology International

SN - 2152-7806

IS - SUPPL. 3

ER -