TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of smoke evacuation on patient experience during Mohs surgery
AU - Yonan, Yousif
AU - Ochoa, Shari
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - BACKGROUND There have been several investigations into possible health risks of surgical smoke exposure, and it has previously been associated with harboring pathogens and carcinogens. Patients in the authors' practice have expressed that the odor from the smoke created by electrosurgical equipment is unpleasant. OBJECTIVE The authors sought to determine if smoke evacuation decreases patient perception of smoke created by electrosurgery during Mohs surgery and if it subsequently improves patient satisfaction with their surgical experience by minimizing the associated odor. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty patients were enrolled in this comparative trial. Smoke evacuation was used during closure but not during Mohs stages. Patients were queried regarding their experience and preferences during and at the end of the procedure. RESULTS 100% of patients reported the perception of a burning odor during removal of Mohs stages, compared with 40% reporting the perception of a burning odor during closure. During the Mohs stages, 66.6% of patients reported the odor as unpleasant compared with 16.6% of patients during closure. There were no statistically significant differences in patient perceptions when stratified by age, sex, or surgical site. CONCLUSION The authors believe that using a wall suction smoke evacuation system is simple and can result in a more pleasant experience for patients undergoing Mohs surgery.
AB - BACKGROUND There have been several investigations into possible health risks of surgical smoke exposure, and it has previously been associated with harboring pathogens and carcinogens. Patients in the authors' practice have expressed that the odor from the smoke created by electrosurgical equipment is unpleasant. OBJECTIVE The authors sought to determine if smoke evacuation decreases patient perception of smoke created by electrosurgery during Mohs surgery and if it subsequently improves patient satisfaction with their surgical experience by minimizing the associated odor. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty patients were enrolled in this comparative trial. Smoke evacuation was used during closure but not during Mohs stages. Patients were queried regarding their experience and preferences during and at the end of the procedure. RESULTS 100% of patients reported the perception of a burning odor during removal of Mohs stages, compared with 40% reporting the perception of a burning odor during closure. During the Mohs stages, 66.6% of patients reported the odor as unpleasant compared with 16.6% of patients during closure. There were no statistically significant differences in patient perceptions when stratified by age, sex, or surgical site. CONCLUSION The authors believe that using a wall suction smoke evacuation system is simple and can result in a more pleasant experience for patients undergoing Mohs surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032155257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032155257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001195
DO - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001195
M3 - Article
C2 - 28562439
AN - SCOPUS:85032155257
SN - 1076-0512
VL - 43
SP - 1363
EP - 1366
JO - Dermatologic Surgery
JF - Dermatologic Surgery
IS - 11
ER -