Identification of optimal electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction: A population-based study

Khawaja Afzal Ammar, Barbara P. Yawn, Lynn Urban, Douglas W. Mahoney, Jan A. Kors, Steven Jacobsen, Richard J. Rodeheffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite using the same tool (ECG), the proportion of myocardial infarctions that goes unrecognized varies from 20% to 60% in population-based studies. The reasons for such wide variations have not been studied. We sought to evaluate the effect of ECG-MI criteria and study methodology on the prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) and to identify the optimal ECG-MI criteria for UMI detection in epidemiologic studies. Methods: A random population-based sample of 2042 adults, age ≥45 years, underwent history, medical record abstraction and ECG. Six different ECG-MI criteria and two subjective recognized myocardial infarction (RMI) identification criteria, from different published studies, were applied to the same survey ECG. The operating test characteristics of different criteria were compared with the objective criterion standard of a RMI by Gillum criteria. Results: The UMI proportion estimates varied from 32% to 61% due to variation in ECG-MI criteria, while keeping the study population, MI recognition criteria, and ECG constant. Subjective criteria for Ml recognition had limited value (positive predictive value of 44-93%) in picking up RMI. Depending on the ECG abnormality used to define MI, ECG reading had widely varying sensitivity (21-37%; P < 0.0001) with consistently high specificity (92-97%) for detection of RMI. Conclusions: The prevalence estimates of UMI vary widely and are strongly dependent on the ECG-MI and MI recognition criteria. Future studies of UMI should explicitly recognize this variation and select the ECG-MI criteria that match their study aims.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-205
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

Electrocardiography
Myocardial Infarction
Population
Medical Records
Reading
Epidemiologic Studies
History

Keywords

  • ECG-MI criteria
  • Electrocardiogram
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Unrecognized myocardial infarction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Identification of optimal electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction : A population-based study. / Ammar, Khawaja Afzal; Yawn, Barbara P.; Urban, Lynn; Mahoney, Douglas W.; Kors, Jan A.; Jacobsen, Steven; Rodeheffer, Richard J.

In: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 197-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ammar, Khawaja Afzal ; Yawn, Barbara P. ; Urban, Lynn ; Mahoney, Douglas W. ; Kors, Jan A. ; Jacobsen, Steven ; Rodeheffer, Richard J. / Identification of optimal electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction : A population-based study. In: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. 2005 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 197-205.
@article{4e5ce1764f1f46cc89db584818566a84,
title = "Identification of optimal electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction: A population-based study",
abstract = "Background: Despite using the same tool (ECG), the proportion of myocardial infarctions that goes unrecognized varies from 20{\%} to 60{\%} in population-based studies. The reasons for such wide variations have not been studied. We sought to evaluate the effect of ECG-MI criteria and study methodology on the prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) and to identify the optimal ECG-MI criteria for UMI detection in epidemiologic studies. Methods: A random population-based sample of 2042 adults, age ≥45 years, underwent history, medical record abstraction and ECG. Six different ECG-MI criteria and two subjective recognized myocardial infarction (RMI) identification criteria, from different published studies, were applied to the same survey ECG. The operating test characteristics of different criteria were compared with the objective criterion standard of a RMI by Gillum criteria. Results: The UMI proportion estimates varied from 32{\%} to 61{\%} due to variation in ECG-MI criteria, while keeping the study population, MI recognition criteria, and ECG constant. Subjective criteria for Ml recognition had limited value (positive predictive value of 44-93{\%}) in picking up RMI. Depending on the ECG abnormality used to define MI, ECG reading had widely varying sensitivity (21-37{\%}; P < 0.0001) with consistently high specificity (92-97{\%}) for detection of RMI. Conclusions: The prevalence estimates of UMI vary widely and are strongly dependent on the ECG-MI and MI recognition criteria. Future studies of UMI should explicitly recognize this variation and select the ECG-MI criteria that match their study aims.",
keywords = "ECG-MI criteria, Electrocardiogram, Ischemic heart disease, Unrecognized myocardial infarction",
author = "Ammar, {Khawaja Afzal} and Yawn, {Barbara P.} and Lynn Urban and Mahoney, {Douglas W.} and Kors, {Jan A.} and Steven Jacobsen and Rodeheffer, {Richard J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.05628.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "197--205",
journal = "Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology",
issn = "1082-720X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification of optimal electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction

T2 - A population-based study

AU - Ammar, Khawaja Afzal

AU - Yawn, Barbara P.

AU - Urban, Lynn

AU - Mahoney, Douglas W.

AU - Kors, Jan A.

AU - Jacobsen, Steven

AU - Rodeheffer, Richard J.

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - Background: Despite using the same tool (ECG), the proportion of myocardial infarctions that goes unrecognized varies from 20% to 60% in population-based studies. The reasons for such wide variations have not been studied. We sought to evaluate the effect of ECG-MI criteria and study methodology on the prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) and to identify the optimal ECG-MI criteria for UMI detection in epidemiologic studies. Methods: A random population-based sample of 2042 adults, age ≥45 years, underwent history, medical record abstraction and ECG. Six different ECG-MI criteria and two subjective recognized myocardial infarction (RMI) identification criteria, from different published studies, were applied to the same survey ECG. The operating test characteristics of different criteria were compared with the objective criterion standard of a RMI by Gillum criteria. Results: The UMI proportion estimates varied from 32% to 61% due to variation in ECG-MI criteria, while keeping the study population, MI recognition criteria, and ECG constant. Subjective criteria for Ml recognition had limited value (positive predictive value of 44-93%) in picking up RMI. Depending on the ECG abnormality used to define MI, ECG reading had widely varying sensitivity (21-37%; P < 0.0001) with consistently high specificity (92-97%) for detection of RMI. Conclusions: The prevalence estimates of UMI vary widely and are strongly dependent on the ECG-MI and MI recognition criteria. Future studies of UMI should explicitly recognize this variation and select the ECG-MI criteria that match their study aims.

AB - Background: Despite using the same tool (ECG), the proportion of myocardial infarctions that goes unrecognized varies from 20% to 60% in population-based studies. The reasons for such wide variations have not been studied. We sought to evaluate the effect of ECG-MI criteria and study methodology on the prevalence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) and to identify the optimal ECG-MI criteria for UMI detection in epidemiologic studies. Methods: A random population-based sample of 2042 adults, age ≥45 years, underwent history, medical record abstraction and ECG. Six different ECG-MI criteria and two subjective recognized myocardial infarction (RMI) identification criteria, from different published studies, were applied to the same survey ECG. The operating test characteristics of different criteria were compared with the objective criterion standard of a RMI by Gillum criteria. Results: The UMI proportion estimates varied from 32% to 61% due to variation in ECG-MI criteria, while keeping the study population, MI recognition criteria, and ECG constant. Subjective criteria for Ml recognition had limited value (positive predictive value of 44-93%) in picking up RMI. Depending on the ECG abnormality used to define MI, ECG reading had widely varying sensitivity (21-37%; P < 0.0001) with consistently high specificity (92-97%) for detection of RMI. Conclusions: The prevalence estimates of UMI vary widely and are strongly dependent on the ECG-MI and MI recognition criteria. Future studies of UMI should explicitly recognize this variation and select the ECG-MI criteria that match their study aims.

KW - ECG-MI criteria

KW - Electrocardiogram

KW - Ischemic heart disease

KW - Unrecognized myocardial infarction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18444409652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18444409652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.05628.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.05628.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15842432

AN - SCOPUS:18444409652

VL - 10

SP - 197

EP - 205

JO - Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology

JF - Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology

SN - 1082-720X

IS - 2

ER -