Human factors in robotic assisted surgery

Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'

Ken Catchpole, Ann Bisantz, Susan Hallbeck, Matthias Weigl, Rebecca Randell, Merrick Kossack, Jennifer T. Anger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews studies conducted "in the wild" that explore the "ironies of automation" in Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS). Workload may be reduced for the surgeon, but increased for other team members, with postural stress relocated rather than reduced, and the introduction of a range of new challenges, for example, in the need to control multiple arms, with multiple instruments; and the increased demands of being physically separated from the team. Workflow disruptions were not compared with other surgeries; however, the prevalence of equipment and training disruptions differs from other types of surgeries. A consistent observation is that communication and coordination problems are relatively frequent, suggesting that the surgical team may need to be trained to use specific verbal and non-verbal cues during surgery. RAS also changes the necessary size of the operating room instrument cleaning processes. These studies demonstrate the value of clinically-based human factors engineers working alongside surgical teams to improve the delivery of RAS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalApplied Ergonomics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Robotics
Human engineering
Surgery
surgery
Operating rooms
Workflow
Automation
irony
workflow
Operating Rooms
Workload
automation
workload
Cues
engineer
Cleaning
Communication
Observation
Engineers
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Automation
  • Human factors
  • Robotics
  • Surgery
  • Teamwork
  • Workload

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Catchpole, K., Bisantz, A., Hallbeck, S., Weigl, M., Randell, R., Kossack, M., & Anger, J. T. (Accepted/In press). Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'. Applied Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.011

Human factors in robotic assisted surgery : Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'. / Catchpole, Ken; Bisantz, Ann; Hallbeck, Susan; Weigl, Matthias; Randell, Rebecca; Kossack, Merrick; Anger, Jennifer T.

In: Applied Ergonomics, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Catchpole, Ken ; Bisantz, Ann ; Hallbeck, Susan ; Weigl, Matthias ; Randell, Rebecca ; Kossack, Merrick ; Anger, Jennifer T. / Human factors in robotic assisted surgery : Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'. In: Applied Ergonomics. 2018.
@article{4bc4a4edcb524371ba6d3256eb3dcff6,
title = "Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'",
abstract = "This article reviews studies conducted {"}in the wild{"} that explore the {"}ironies of automation{"} in Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS). Workload may be reduced for the surgeon, but increased for other team members, with postural stress relocated rather than reduced, and the introduction of a range of new challenges, for example, in the need to control multiple arms, with multiple instruments; and the increased demands of being physically separated from the team. Workflow disruptions were not compared with other surgeries; however, the prevalence of equipment and training disruptions differs from other types of surgeries. A consistent observation is that communication and coordination problems are relatively frequent, suggesting that the surgical team may need to be trained to use specific verbal and non-verbal cues during surgery. RAS also changes the necessary size of the operating room instrument cleaning processes. These studies demonstrate the value of clinically-based human factors engineers working alongside surgical teams to improve the delivery of RAS.",
keywords = "Automation, Human factors, Robotics, Surgery, Teamwork, Workload",
author = "Ken Catchpole and Ann Bisantz and Susan Hallbeck and Matthias Weigl and Rebecca Randell and Merrick Kossack and Anger, {Jennifer T.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.011",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human factors in robotic assisted surgery

T2 - Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'

AU - Catchpole, Ken

AU - Bisantz, Ann

AU - Hallbeck, Susan

AU - Weigl, Matthias

AU - Randell, Rebecca

AU - Kossack, Merrick

AU - Anger, Jennifer T.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This article reviews studies conducted "in the wild" that explore the "ironies of automation" in Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS). Workload may be reduced for the surgeon, but increased for other team members, with postural stress relocated rather than reduced, and the introduction of a range of new challenges, for example, in the need to control multiple arms, with multiple instruments; and the increased demands of being physically separated from the team. Workflow disruptions were not compared with other surgeries; however, the prevalence of equipment and training disruptions differs from other types of surgeries. A consistent observation is that communication and coordination problems are relatively frequent, suggesting that the surgical team may need to be trained to use specific verbal and non-verbal cues during surgery. RAS also changes the necessary size of the operating room instrument cleaning processes. These studies demonstrate the value of clinically-based human factors engineers working alongside surgical teams to improve the delivery of RAS.

AB - This article reviews studies conducted "in the wild" that explore the "ironies of automation" in Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS). Workload may be reduced for the surgeon, but increased for other team members, with postural stress relocated rather than reduced, and the introduction of a range of new challenges, for example, in the need to control multiple arms, with multiple instruments; and the increased demands of being physically separated from the team. Workflow disruptions were not compared with other surgeries; however, the prevalence of equipment and training disruptions differs from other types of surgeries. A consistent observation is that communication and coordination problems are relatively frequent, suggesting that the surgical team may need to be trained to use specific verbal and non-verbal cues during surgery. RAS also changes the necessary size of the operating room instrument cleaning processes. These studies demonstrate the value of clinically-based human factors engineers working alongside surgical teams to improve the delivery of RAS.

KW - Automation

KW - Human factors

KW - Robotics

KW - Surgery

KW - Teamwork

KW - Workload

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042285310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042285310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.011

M3 - Article

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

ER -