How to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in clinical practice

T. D. Aungst, K. A. Clauson, Sanjay Misra, T. L. Lewis, I. Husain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There are thousands of medical applications for mobile devices targeting use by healthcare professionals. However, several factors related to the structure of the existing market for medical applications create significant barriers preventing practitioners from effectively identifying mobile medical applications for individual professional use. Aims: To define existing market factors relevant to selection of medical applications and describe a framework to empower clinicians to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in their own practice. Materials and Methods: Resources available on the Internet regarding mobile medical applications, guidelines and published research on mobile medical applications. Results: Mobile application stores (e.g. iTunes, Google Play) are not effective means of identifying mobile medical applications. Users of mobile devices that desire to implement mobile medical applications into practice need to carefully assess individual applications prior to utilisation. Discussion: Searching and identifying mobile medical applications requires clinicians to utilise multiple references to determine what application is best for their individual practice methods. This can be done with a cursory exploration of mobile application stores and then moving onto other available resources published in the literature or through Internet resources (e.g. blogs, medical websites, social media). Clinicians must also take steps to ensure that an identified mobile application can be integrated into practice after carefully reviewing it themselves. Conclusion: Clinicians seeking to identify mobile medical application for use in their individual practice should use a combination of app stores, published literature, web-based resources, and personal review to ensure safe and appropriate use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-162
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Practice
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mobile Applications
Internet
Blogging
Social Media
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

How to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in clinical practice. / Aungst, T. D.; Clauson, K. A.; Misra, Sanjay; Lewis, T. L.; Husain, I.

In: International Journal of Clinical Practice, Vol. 68, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 155-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aungst, T. D. ; Clauson, K. A. ; Misra, Sanjay ; Lewis, T. L. ; Husain, I. / How to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in clinical practice. In: International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2014 ; Vol. 68, No. 2. pp. 155-162.
@article{1a2ef060bfba453285b98955bd0b00a2,
title = "How to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in clinical practice",
abstract = "Background: There are thousands of medical applications for mobile devices targeting use by healthcare professionals. However, several factors related to the structure of the existing market for medical applications create significant barriers preventing practitioners from effectively identifying mobile medical applications for individual professional use. Aims: To define existing market factors relevant to selection of medical applications and describe a framework to empower clinicians to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in their own practice. Materials and Methods: Resources available on the Internet regarding mobile medical applications, guidelines and published research on mobile medical applications. Results: Mobile application stores (e.g. iTunes, Google Play) are not effective means of identifying mobile medical applications. Users of mobile devices that desire to implement mobile medical applications into practice need to carefully assess individual applications prior to utilisation. Discussion: Searching and identifying mobile medical applications requires clinicians to utilise multiple references to determine what application is best for their individual practice methods. This can be done with a cursory exploration of mobile application stores and then moving onto other available resources published in the literature or through Internet resources (e.g. blogs, medical websites, social media). Clinicians must also take steps to ensure that an identified mobile application can be integrated into practice after carefully reviewing it themselves. Conclusion: Clinicians seeking to identify mobile medical application for use in their individual practice should use a combination of app stores, published literature, web-based resources, and personal review to ensure safe and appropriate use.",
author = "Aungst, {T. D.} and Clauson, {K. A.} and Sanjay Misra and Lewis, {T. L.} and I. Husain",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/ijcp.12375",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "155--162",
journal = "International Journal of Clinical Practice",
issn = "1368-5031",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in clinical practice

AU - Aungst, T. D.

AU - Clauson, K. A.

AU - Misra, Sanjay

AU - Lewis, T. L.

AU - Husain, I.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Background: There are thousands of medical applications for mobile devices targeting use by healthcare professionals. However, several factors related to the structure of the existing market for medical applications create significant barriers preventing practitioners from effectively identifying mobile medical applications for individual professional use. Aims: To define existing market factors relevant to selection of medical applications and describe a framework to empower clinicians to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in their own practice. Materials and Methods: Resources available on the Internet regarding mobile medical applications, guidelines and published research on mobile medical applications. Results: Mobile application stores (e.g. iTunes, Google Play) are not effective means of identifying mobile medical applications. Users of mobile devices that desire to implement mobile medical applications into practice need to carefully assess individual applications prior to utilisation. Discussion: Searching and identifying mobile medical applications requires clinicians to utilise multiple references to determine what application is best for their individual practice methods. This can be done with a cursory exploration of mobile application stores and then moving onto other available resources published in the literature or through Internet resources (e.g. blogs, medical websites, social media). Clinicians must also take steps to ensure that an identified mobile application can be integrated into practice after carefully reviewing it themselves. Conclusion: Clinicians seeking to identify mobile medical application for use in their individual practice should use a combination of app stores, published literature, web-based resources, and personal review to ensure safe and appropriate use.

AB - Background: There are thousands of medical applications for mobile devices targeting use by healthcare professionals. However, several factors related to the structure of the existing market for medical applications create significant barriers preventing practitioners from effectively identifying mobile medical applications for individual professional use. Aims: To define existing market factors relevant to selection of medical applications and describe a framework to empower clinicians to identify, assess and utilise mobile medical applications in their own practice. Materials and Methods: Resources available on the Internet regarding mobile medical applications, guidelines and published research on mobile medical applications. Results: Mobile application stores (e.g. iTunes, Google Play) are not effective means of identifying mobile medical applications. Users of mobile devices that desire to implement mobile medical applications into practice need to carefully assess individual applications prior to utilisation. Discussion: Searching and identifying mobile medical applications requires clinicians to utilise multiple references to determine what application is best for their individual practice methods. This can be done with a cursory exploration of mobile application stores and then moving onto other available resources published in the literature or through Internet resources (e.g. blogs, medical websites, social media). Clinicians must also take steps to ensure that an identified mobile application can be integrated into practice after carefully reviewing it themselves. Conclusion: Clinicians seeking to identify mobile medical application for use in their individual practice should use a combination of app stores, published literature, web-based resources, and personal review to ensure safe and appropriate use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893033598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893033598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ijcp.12375

DO - 10.1111/ijcp.12375

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 155

EP - 162

JO - International Journal of Clinical Practice

JF - International Journal of Clinical Practice

SN - 1368-5031

IS - 2

ER -