TY - JOUR
T1 - How does tissue preparation affect skeletal muscle transverse isotropy?
AU - Wheatley, Benjamin B.
AU - Odegard, Gregory M.
AU - Kaufman, Kenton R.
AU - Donahue, Tammy L.Haut
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health : National Institute of Child Health & Human Development for financial support [ R01HD31476-12 ].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016/9/6
Y1 - 2016/9/6
N2 - The passive tensile properties of skeletal muscle play a key role in its physiological function. Previous research has identified conflicting reports of muscle transverse isotropy, with some data suggesting the longitudinal direction is stiffest, while others show the transverse direction is stiffest. Accurate constitutive models of skeletal muscle must be employed to provide correct recommendations for and observations of clinical methods. The goal of this work was to identify transversely isotropic tensile muscle properties as a function of post mortem handling. Six pairs of tibialis anterior muscles were harvested from Giant Flemish rabbits and split into two groups: fresh testing (within four hours post mortem), and non-fresh testing (subject to delayed testing and a freeze/thaw cycle). Longitudinal and transverse samples were removed from each muscle and tested to identify tensile modulus and relaxation behavior. Longitudinal non-fresh samples exhibited a higher initial modulus value and faster relaxation than longitudinal fresh, transverse fresh, and transverse rigor samples (p<0.05), while longitudinal fresh samples were less stiff at lower strain levels than longitudinal non-fresh, transverse fresh, and transverse non-fresh samples (p<0.05), but exhibited more nonlinear behavior. While fresh skeletal muscle exhibits a higher transverse modulus than longitudinal modulus, discrepancies in previously published data may be the result of a number of differences in experimental protocol. Constitutive modeling of fresh muscle should reflect these data by identifying the material as truly transversely isotropic and not as an isotropic matrix reinforced with fibers.
AB - The passive tensile properties of skeletal muscle play a key role in its physiological function. Previous research has identified conflicting reports of muscle transverse isotropy, with some data suggesting the longitudinal direction is stiffest, while others show the transverse direction is stiffest. Accurate constitutive models of skeletal muscle must be employed to provide correct recommendations for and observations of clinical methods. The goal of this work was to identify transversely isotropic tensile muscle properties as a function of post mortem handling. Six pairs of tibialis anterior muscles were harvested from Giant Flemish rabbits and split into two groups: fresh testing (within four hours post mortem), and non-fresh testing (subject to delayed testing and a freeze/thaw cycle). Longitudinal and transverse samples were removed from each muscle and tested to identify tensile modulus and relaxation behavior. Longitudinal non-fresh samples exhibited a higher initial modulus value and faster relaxation than longitudinal fresh, transverse fresh, and transverse rigor samples (p<0.05), while longitudinal fresh samples were less stiff at lower strain levels than longitudinal non-fresh, transverse fresh, and transverse non-fresh samples (p<0.05), but exhibited more nonlinear behavior. While fresh skeletal muscle exhibits a higher transverse modulus than longitudinal modulus, discrepancies in previously published data may be the result of a number of differences in experimental protocol. Constitutive modeling of fresh muscle should reflect these data by identifying the material as truly transversely isotropic and not as an isotropic matrix reinforced with fibers.
KW - Constitutive modeling
KW - Material testing
KW - Mechanical properties
KW - Rigor mortis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978872751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978872751&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.034
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.034
M3 - Article
C2 - 27425557
AN - SCOPUS:84978872751
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 49
SP - 3056
EP - 3060
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 13
ER -