Health values before and after pacemaker implantation

Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, Lee Goldman, E. John Orav, Kenneth Ellenbogen, Bruce Stambler, Roger Marinchak, Bruce L. Wilkoff, Carol M. Mangione, Catherine Yoon, Kimberly Vitale, Gervasio A. Lamas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Health value or utility is the abstracted magnitude of a person's preference for quality and quantity of life. It reflects how much lifetime with the patient's current health condition a patient is willing to exchange for a life in excellent health. Health values are used in cost-effectiveness analysis as a means of calculating quality-adjusted years of life. Objective: This study assessed the health values of elderly patients before and after pacemaker implantation. Methods: We prospectively examined 398 patients from the Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly study, in which patients were randomized to either VVIR or DDDR mode. Health values were estimated with the time tradeoff method before implantation and at 3, 9, and 18 months after implantation. Results: The mean age of patients was 76 ± 6 years; 234 patients (59%) were male. At baseline, patients were, on average, willing to exchange 5 years of current health for approximately 4 years in perfect health (value 0.76 ± 0.06). There was no difference in baseline health values with implant diagnosis (sinus node dysfunction n = 172, 0.72, atrio-ventricular block n = 227, 0.75, other diagnoses n = 39, 0.78, P = not significant). The overall improvement in health values at 3 months after pacemaker implantation was O.165 ± 0.4 (P = .0001). The improvement in health values was independent of pacing mode (P = .6). The time tradeoff score was modestly correlated with other measurements of health-related quality of life. The change in time tradeoff score with time was not influenced by demographic characteristics such as age and sex, diagnoses, pacing mode, employment status, or history of angina. Patients with a lower functional class at enrollment (III or IV on the Specific Activity Scale) demonstrated an absolute improvement of 23% in their health values, whereas patients in class I or II improved only by 12%, (P = .03). Conclusions: Permanent pacemaker implantation for standard indications improves health values and descriptive health status measures. The values reported here may be used as a means of calculating the cost-effectiveness of different pacing modalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)687-692
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume144
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Quality of Life
Sick Sinus Syndrome
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Patient Selection
Health Status
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Lopez-Jimenez, F., Goldman, L., Orav, E. J., Ellenbogen, K., Stambler, B., Marinchak, R., ... Lamas, G. A. (2002). Health values before and after pacemaker implantation. American Heart Journal, 144(4), 687-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(02)00143-6

Health values before and after pacemaker implantation. / Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco; Goldman, Lee; Orav, E. John; Ellenbogen, Kenneth; Stambler, Bruce; Marinchak, Roger; Wilkoff, Bruce L.; Mangione, Carol M.; Yoon, Catherine; Vitale, Kimberly; Lamas, Gervasio A.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 144, No. 4, 01.10.2002, p. 687-692.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lopez-Jimenez, F, Goldman, L, Orav, EJ, Ellenbogen, K, Stambler, B, Marinchak, R, Wilkoff, BL, Mangione, CM, Yoon, C, Vitale, K & Lamas, GA 2002, 'Health values before and after pacemaker implantation', American Heart Journal, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 687-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(02)00143-6
Lopez-Jimenez F, Goldman L, Orav EJ, Ellenbogen K, Stambler B, Marinchak R et al. Health values before and after pacemaker implantation. American Heart Journal. 2002 Oct 1;144(4):687-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(02)00143-6
Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco ; Goldman, Lee ; Orav, E. John ; Ellenbogen, Kenneth ; Stambler, Bruce ; Marinchak, Roger ; Wilkoff, Bruce L. ; Mangione, Carol M. ; Yoon, Catherine ; Vitale, Kimberly ; Lamas, Gervasio A. / Health values before and after pacemaker implantation. In: American Heart Journal. 2002 ; Vol. 144, No. 4. pp. 687-692.
@article{75cb7bddc38f476c86d30830cfc2b13f,
title = "Health values before and after pacemaker implantation",
abstract = "Background: Health value or utility is the abstracted magnitude of a person's preference for quality and quantity of life. It reflects how much lifetime with the patient's current health condition a patient is willing to exchange for a life in excellent health. Health values are used in cost-effectiveness analysis as a means of calculating quality-adjusted years of life. Objective: This study assessed the health values of elderly patients before and after pacemaker implantation. Methods: We prospectively examined 398 patients from the Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly study, in which patients were randomized to either VVIR or DDDR mode. Health values were estimated with the time tradeoff method before implantation and at 3, 9, and 18 months after implantation. Results: The mean age of patients was 76 ± 6 years; 234 patients (59{\%}) were male. At baseline, patients were, on average, willing to exchange 5 years of current health for approximately 4 years in perfect health (value 0.76 ± 0.06). There was no difference in baseline health values with implant diagnosis (sinus node dysfunction n = 172, 0.72, atrio-ventricular block n = 227, 0.75, other diagnoses n = 39, 0.78, P = not significant). The overall improvement in health values at 3 months after pacemaker implantation was O.165 ± 0.4 (P = .0001). The improvement in health values was independent of pacing mode (P = .6). The time tradeoff score was modestly correlated with other measurements of health-related quality of life. The change in time tradeoff score with time was not influenced by demographic characteristics such as age and sex, diagnoses, pacing mode, employment status, or history of angina. Patients with a lower functional class at enrollment (III or IV on the Specific Activity Scale) demonstrated an absolute improvement of 23{\%} in their health values, whereas patients in class I or II improved only by 12{\%}, (P = .03). Conclusions: Permanent pacemaker implantation for standard indications improves health values and descriptive health status measures. The values reported here may be used as a means of calculating the cost-effectiveness of different pacing modalities.",
author = "Francisco Lopez-Jimenez and Lee Goldman and Orav, {E. John} and Kenneth Ellenbogen and Bruce Stambler and Roger Marinchak and Wilkoff, {Bruce L.} and Mangione, {Carol M.} and Catherine Yoon and Kimberly Vitale and Lamas, {Gervasio A.}",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-8703(02)00143-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "687--692",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health values before and after pacemaker implantation

AU - Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco

AU - Goldman, Lee

AU - Orav, E. John

AU - Ellenbogen, Kenneth

AU - Stambler, Bruce

AU - Marinchak, Roger

AU - Wilkoff, Bruce L.

AU - Mangione, Carol M.

AU - Yoon, Catherine

AU - Vitale, Kimberly

AU - Lamas, Gervasio A.

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - Background: Health value or utility is the abstracted magnitude of a person's preference for quality and quantity of life. It reflects how much lifetime with the patient's current health condition a patient is willing to exchange for a life in excellent health. Health values are used in cost-effectiveness analysis as a means of calculating quality-adjusted years of life. Objective: This study assessed the health values of elderly patients before and after pacemaker implantation. Methods: We prospectively examined 398 patients from the Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly study, in which patients were randomized to either VVIR or DDDR mode. Health values were estimated with the time tradeoff method before implantation and at 3, 9, and 18 months after implantation. Results: The mean age of patients was 76 ± 6 years; 234 patients (59%) were male. At baseline, patients were, on average, willing to exchange 5 years of current health for approximately 4 years in perfect health (value 0.76 ± 0.06). There was no difference in baseline health values with implant diagnosis (sinus node dysfunction n = 172, 0.72, atrio-ventricular block n = 227, 0.75, other diagnoses n = 39, 0.78, P = not significant). The overall improvement in health values at 3 months after pacemaker implantation was O.165 ± 0.4 (P = .0001). The improvement in health values was independent of pacing mode (P = .6). The time tradeoff score was modestly correlated with other measurements of health-related quality of life. The change in time tradeoff score with time was not influenced by demographic characteristics such as age and sex, diagnoses, pacing mode, employment status, or history of angina. Patients with a lower functional class at enrollment (III or IV on the Specific Activity Scale) demonstrated an absolute improvement of 23% in their health values, whereas patients in class I or II improved only by 12%, (P = .03). Conclusions: Permanent pacemaker implantation for standard indications improves health values and descriptive health status measures. The values reported here may be used as a means of calculating the cost-effectiveness of different pacing modalities.

AB - Background: Health value or utility is the abstracted magnitude of a person's preference for quality and quantity of life. It reflects how much lifetime with the patient's current health condition a patient is willing to exchange for a life in excellent health. Health values are used in cost-effectiveness analysis as a means of calculating quality-adjusted years of life. Objective: This study assessed the health values of elderly patients before and after pacemaker implantation. Methods: We prospectively examined 398 patients from the Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly study, in which patients were randomized to either VVIR or DDDR mode. Health values were estimated with the time tradeoff method before implantation and at 3, 9, and 18 months after implantation. Results: The mean age of patients was 76 ± 6 years; 234 patients (59%) were male. At baseline, patients were, on average, willing to exchange 5 years of current health for approximately 4 years in perfect health (value 0.76 ± 0.06). There was no difference in baseline health values with implant diagnosis (sinus node dysfunction n = 172, 0.72, atrio-ventricular block n = 227, 0.75, other diagnoses n = 39, 0.78, P = not significant). The overall improvement in health values at 3 months after pacemaker implantation was O.165 ± 0.4 (P = .0001). The improvement in health values was independent of pacing mode (P = .6). The time tradeoff score was modestly correlated with other measurements of health-related quality of life. The change in time tradeoff score with time was not influenced by demographic characteristics such as age and sex, diagnoses, pacing mode, employment status, or history of angina. Patients with a lower functional class at enrollment (III or IV on the Specific Activity Scale) demonstrated an absolute improvement of 23% in their health values, whereas patients in class I or II improved only by 12%, (P = .03). Conclusions: Permanent pacemaker implantation for standard indications improves health values and descriptive health status measures. The values reported here may be used as a means of calculating the cost-effectiveness of different pacing modalities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036792175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036792175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-8703(02)00143-6

DO - 10.1016/S0002-8703(02)00143-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 12360166

AN - SCOPUS:0036792175

VL - 144

SP - 687

EP - 692

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 4

ER -