Geometric morphometric analyses of hominid proximal femora

Taxonomic and phylogenetic considerations

T. W. Holliday, Vance T. Hutchinson, Melissa (Missy) M. Morrow, Glen A. Livesay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The proximal femur has long been used to distinguish fossil hominin taxa. Specifically, the genus Homo is said to be characterized by larger femoral heads, shorter femoral necks, and more lateral flare of the greater trochanter than are members of the genera Australopithecus or Paranthropus. Here, a digitizing arm was used to collect landmark data on recent human (n=82), chimpanzee (n=16), and gorilla (n=20) femora and casts of six fossil hominin femora in order to test whether one can discriminate extant and fossil hominid (sensu lato) femora into different taxa using three-dimensional (3D) geometric morphometric analyses. Twenty proximal femoral landmarks were chosen to best quantify the shape differences between hominin genera. These data were first subjected to Procrustes analysis. The resultant fitted coordinate values were then subjected to PCA. PC scores were used to compute a dissimilarity matrix that was subjected to cluster analyses. Results indicate that one can easily distinguish Homo, Pan, and Gorilla from each other based on proximal femur shape, and one can distinguish Pliocene and Early Pleistocene hominin femora from those of recent Homo. It is more difficult to distinguish Early Pleistocene Homo proximal femora from those of Australopithecus or Paranthropus, but cluster analyses appear to separate the fossil hominins into four groups: an early australopith cluster that is an outlier from other fossil hominins; and two clusters that are sister taxa to each other: a late australopith/Paranthropus group and an early Homo group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-15
Number of pages13
JournalHOMO- Journal of Comparative Human Biology
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Group
PC
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Cite this

Geometric morphometric analyses of hominid proximal femora : Taxonomic and phylogenetic considerations. / Holliday, T. W.; Hutchinson, Vance T.; Morrow, Melissa (Missy) M.; Livesay, Glen A.

In: HOMO- Journal of Comparative Human Biology, Vol. 61, No. 1, 02.2010, p. 3-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fcc6c2fac680413c9434ffcd159a4362,
title = "Geometric morphometric analyses of hominid proximal femora: Taxonomic and phylogenetic considerations",
abstract = "The proximal femur has long been used to distinguish fossil hominin taxa. Specifically, the genus Homo is said to be characterized by larger femoral heads, shorter femoral necks, and more lateral flare of the greater trochanter than are members of the genera Australopithecus or Paranthropus. Here, a digitizing arm was used to collect landmark data on recent human (n=82), chimpanzee (n=16), and gorilla (n=20) femora and casts of six fossil hominin femora in order to test whether one can discriminate extant and fossil hominid (sensu lato) femora into different taxa using three-dimensional (3D) geometric morphometric analyses. Twenty proximal femoral landmarks were chosen to best quantify the shape differences between hominin genera. These data were first subjected to Procrustes analysis. The resultant fitted coordinate values were then subjected to PCA. PC scores were used to compute a dissimilarity matrix that was subjected to cluster analyses. Results indicate that one can easily distinguish Homo, Pan, and Gorilla from each other based on proximal femur shape, and one can distinguish Pliocene and Early Pleistocene hominin femora from those of recent Homo. It is more difficult to distinguish Early Pleistocene Homo proximal femora from those of Australopithecus or Paranthropus, but cluster analyses appear to separate the fossil hominins into four groups: an early australopith cluster that is an outlier from other fossil hominins; and two clusters that are sister taxa to each other: a late australopith/Paranthropus group and an early Homo group.",
author = "Holliday, {T. W.} and Hutchinson, {Vance T.} and Morrow, {Melissa (Missy) M.} and Livesay, {Glen A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jchb.2010.01.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "3--15",
journal = "HOMO- Journal of Comparative Human Biology",
issn = "0018-442X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geometric morphometric analyses of hominid proximal femora

T2 - Taxonomic and phylogenetic considerations

AU - Holliday, T. W.

AU - Hutchinson, Vance T.

AU - Morrow, Melissa (Missy) M.

AU - Livesay, Glen A.

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - The proximal femur has long been used to distinguish fossil hominin taxa. Specifically, the genus Homo is said to be characterized by larger femoral heads, shorter femoral necks, and more lateral flare of the greater trochanter than are members of the genera Australopithecus or Paranthropus. Here, a digitizing arm was used to collect landmark data on recent human (n=82), chimpanzee (n=16), and gorilla (n=20) femora and casts of six fossil hominin femora in order to test whether one can discriminate extant and fossil hominid (sensu lato) femora into different taxa using three-dimensional (3D) geometric morphometric analyses. Twenty proximal femoral landmarks were chosen to best quantify the shape differences between hominin genera. These data were first subjected to Procrustes analysis. The resultant fitted coordinate values were then subjected to PCA. PC scores were used to compute a dissimilarity matrix that was subjected to cluster analyses. Results indicate that one can easily distinguish Homo, Pan, and Gorilla from each other based on proximal femur shape, and one can distinguish Pliocene and Early Pleistocene hominin femora from those of recent Homo. It is more difficult to distinguish Early Pleistocene Homo proximal femora from those of Australopithecus or Paranthropus, but cluster analyses appear to separate the fossil hominins into four groups: an early australopith cluster that is an outlier from other fossil hominins; and two clusters that are sister taxa to each other: a late australopith/Paranthropus group and an early Homo group.

AB - The proximal femur has long been used to distinguish fossil hominin taxa. Specifically, the genus Homo is said to be characterized by larger femoral heads, shorter femoral necks, and more lateral flare of the greater trochanter than are members of the genera Australopithecus or Paranthropus. Here, a digitizing arm was used to collect landmark data on recent human (n=82), chimpanzee (n=16), and gorilla (n=20) femora and casts of six fossil hominin femora in order to test whether one can discriminate extant and fossil hominid (sensu lato) femora into different taxa using three-dimensional (3D) geometric morphometric analyses. Twenty proximal femoral landmarks were chosen to best quantify the shape differences between hominin genera. These data were first subjected to Procrustes analysis. The resultant fitted coordinate values were then subjected to PCA. PC scores were used to compute a dissimilarity matrix that was subjected to cluster analyses. Results indicate that one can easily distinguish Homo, Pan, and Gorilla from each other based on proximal femur shape, and one can distinguish Pliocene and Early Pleistocene hominin femora from those of recent Homo. It is more difficult to distinguish Early Pleistocene Homo proximal femora from those of Australopithecus or Paranthropus, but cluster analyses appear to separate the fossil hominins into four groups: an early australopith cluster that is an outlier from other fossil hominins; and two clusters that are sister taxa to each other: a late australopith/Paranthropus group and an early Homo group.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950520838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950520838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jchb.2010.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jchb.2010.01.001

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 3

EP - 15

JO - HOMO- Journal of Comparative Human Biology

JF - HOMO- Journal of Comparative Human Biology

SN - 0018-442X

IS - 1

ER -