Functional and radiographic outcomes following distal ulna implant arthroplasty

Sanjeev Kakar, R. Presley Swann, Kevin I. Perry, Christina M. Wood-Wentz, Alexander Yong-Shik Shin, Steven Lawrence Moran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the outcome of ulnar head endoprostheses in the treatment of distal radioulnar joint instability, arthrosis, or both. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 47 patients to analyze the outcome of a single ulnar head replacement over a 10-year period. All patients reported pain or instability at the distal radioulnar joint. Standardized assessments included a patient-rated pain score, forearm range of motion, grip strength, and Mayo wrist score. We examined preoperative and postoperative radiographs for final implant position, loosening, and osteolysis. Results: We observed 47 patients for a median of 56 months (minimum, 16 mo). There was a statistically significant decrease in pain scores from 4.6 to 2.2 and improvement in the mean Mayo wrist score from 14 to 69 points after surgery. There was no significant improvement in forearm rotation and wrist function. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated 83% survival at 6 years. A total of 14 patients (30%) required additional surgical procedures after primary arthroplasty. Risk factors for failure included history of previous surgery, use of an extended collar, lucency greater than 2 mm around the implant stem, and pedestal formation at the tip of the implant. Conclusions: Distal ulna implant arthroplasty reduces pain and improves function in patients with distal radioulnar joint instability, arthrosis, or both. Therapeutic IV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1364-1371
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery
Volume37
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Ulna
Arthroplasty
Wrist
Joint Instability
Pain
Joint Diseases
Forearm
Head
Osteolysis
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Hand Strength
Articular Range of Motion
Joints
Survival
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • endoprosthesis
  • Ulnar head arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Functional and radiographic outcomes following distal ulna implant arthroplasty. / Kakar, Sanjeev; Swann, R. Presley; Perry, Kevin I.; Wood-Wentz, Christina M.; Shin, Alexander Yong-Shik; Moran, Steven Lawrence.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 7, 07.2012, p. 1364-1371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kakar, Sanjeev ; Swann, R. Presley ; Perry, Kevin I. ; Wood-Wentz, Christina M. ; Shin, Alexander Yong-Shik ; Moran, Steven Lawrence. / Functional and radiographic outcomes following distal ulna implant arthroplasty. In: Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 37, No. 7. pp. 1364-1371.
@article{1d89baa1c08e411ebc9d00e38268fb7b,
title = "Functional and radiographic outcomes following distal ulna implant arthroplasty",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the outcome of ulnar head endoprostheses in the treatment of distal radioulnar joint instability, arthrosis, or both. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 47 patients to analyze the outcome of a single ulnar head replacement over a 10-year period. All patients reported pain or instability at the distal radioulnar joint. Standardized assessments included a patient-rated pain score, forearm range of motion, grip strength, and Mayo wrist score. We examined preoperative and postoperative radiographs for final implant position, loosening, and osteolysis. Results: We observed 47 patients for a median of 56 months (minimum, 16 mo). There was a statistically significant decrease in pain scores from 4.6 to 2.2 and improvement in the mean Mayo wrist score from 14 to 69 points after surgery. There was no significant improvement in forearm rotation and wrist function. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated 83{\%} survival at 6 years. A total of 14 patients (30{\%}) required additional surgical procedures after primary arthroplasty. Risk factors for failure included history of previous surgery, use of an extended collar, lucency greater than 2 mm around the implant stem, and pedestal formation at the tip of the implant. Conclusions: Distal ulna implant arthroplasty reduces pain and improves function in patients with distal radioulnar joint instability, arthrosis, or both. Therapeutic IV.",
keywords = "endoprosthesis, Ulnar head arthroplasty",
author = "Sanjeev Kakar and Swann, {R. Presley} and Perry, {Kevin I.} and Wood-Wentz, {Christina M.} and Shin, {Alexander Yong-Shik} and Moran, {Steven Lawrence}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1364--1371",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery",
issn = "0266-7681",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional and radiographic outcomes following distal ulna implant arthroplasty

AU - Kakar, Sanjeev

AU - Swann, R. Presley

AU - Perry, Kevin I.

AU - Wood-Wentz, Christina M.

AU - Shin, Alexander Yong-Shik

AU - Moran, Steven Lawrence

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Purpose: To determine the outcome of ulnar head endoprostheses in the treatment of distal radioulnar joint instability, arthrosis, or both. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 47 patients to analyze the outcome of a single ulnar head replacement over a 10-year period. All patients reported pain or instability at the distal radioulnar joint. Standardized assessments included a patient-rated pain score, forearm range of motion, grip strength, and Mayo wrist score. We examined preoperative and postoperative radiographs for final implant position, loosening, and osteolysis. Results: We observed 47 patients for a median of 56 months (minimum, 16 mo). There was a statistically significant decrease in pain scores from 4.6 to 2.2 and improvement in the mean Mayo wrist score from 14 to 69 points after surgery. There was no significant improvement in forearm rotation and wrist function. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated 83% survival at 6 years. A total of 14 patients (30%) required additional surgical procedures after primary arthroplasty. Risk factors for failure included history of previous surgery, use of an extended collar, lucency greater than 2 mm around the implant stem, and pedestal formation at the tip of the implant. Conclusions: Distal ulna implant arthroplasty reduces pain and improves function in patients with distal radioulnar joint instability, arthrosis, or both. Therapeutic IV.

AB - Purpose: To determine the outcome of ulnar head endoprostheses in the treatment of distal radioulnar joint instability, arthrosis, or both. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 47 patients to analyze the outcome of a single ulnar head replacement over a 10-year period. All patients reported pain or instability at the distal radioulnar joint. Standardized assessments included a patient-rated pain score, forearm range of motion, grip strength, and Mayo wrist score. We examined preoperative and postoperative radiographs for final implant position, loosening, and osteolysis. Results: We observed 47 patients for a median of 56 months (minimum, 16 mo). There was a statistically significant decrease in pain scores from 4.6 to 2.2 and improvement in the mean Mayo wrist score from 14 to 69 points after surgery. There was no significant improvement in forearm rotation and wrist function. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated 83% survival at 6 years. A total of 14 patients (30%) required additional surgical procedures after primary arthroplasty. Risk factors for failure included history of previous surgery, use of an extended collar, lucency greater than 2 mm around the implant stem, and pedestal formation at the tip of the implant. Conclusions: Distal ulna implant arthroplasty reduces pain and improves function in patients with distal radioulnar joint instability, arthrosis, or both. Therapeutic IV.

KW - endoprosthesis

KW - Ulnar head arthroplasty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862981226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862981226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.026

DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 22721459

AN - SCOPUS:84862981226

VL - 37

SP - 1364

EP - 1371

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery

SN - 0266-7681

IS - 7

ER -