Flow disruptions during trauma care

Daniel Shouhed, Renaldo Blocker, Alex Gangi, Eric Ley, Jennifer Blaha, Daniel Margulies, Douglas A. Wiegmann, Ben Starnes, Cathy Karl, Richard Karl, Bruce L. Gewertz, Ken R. Catchpole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Flow disruptions (FDs) are deviations from the progression of care that compromise safety or efficiency. The frequency and specific causes of FDs remain poorly documented in trauma care. We undertook this study to identify and quantify the rate of FDs during various phases of trauma care. Methods: Seven trained observers studied a Level I trauma center over 2 months. Observers recorded details on FDs using a validated Tablet-PC data collection tool during various phases of care - trauma bay, imaging, operating room (OR) - and recorded work-system variables including breakdowns in communication and coordination, environmental distractions, equipment issues, and patient factors. Results: Researchers observed 86 trauma cases including 72 low-level and 14 high-level activations. Altogether, 1,759 FDs were recorded (20.4/case). High-level trauma comprised a significantly higher number (p = 0.0003) and rate of FDs (p = 0.0158) than low-level trauma. Across the three phases of trauma care, there was a significant effect on FD number (p < 0.0001) and FD rate (p = 0.0005), with the highest in the OR, followed by computed tomography. The highest rates of FD per case and per hour were related to breakdowns in coordination. Conclusions: This study is the largest direct observational study of the trauma process conducted to date. Complexities associated with the critical patient who arrives in the trauma bay lead to a high prevalence of disruptions related to breakdowns in coordination, communication, equipment issues, and environmental factors. Prospective observation allows individual hospitals to identify and analyze these systemic deficiencies. Appropriate interventions can then be evaluated to streamline the care provided to trauma patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)314-321
Number of pages8
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Operating Rooms
Communication
Equipment and Supplies
Trauma Centers
Tablets
Observational Studies
Tomography
Research Personnel
Observation
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Shouhed, D., Blocker, R., Gangi, A., Ley, E., Blaha, J., Margulies, D., ... Catchpole, K. R. (2014). Flow disruptions during trauma care. World Journal of Surgery, 38(2), 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2306-0

Flow disruptions during trauma care. / Shouhed, Daniel; Blocker, Renaldo; Gangi, Alex; Ley, Eric; Blaha, Jennifer; Margulies, Daniel; Wiegmann, Douglas A.; Starnes, Ben; Karl, Cathy; Karl, Richard; Gewertz, Bruce L.; Catchpole, Ken R.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.02.2014, p. 314-321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shouhed, D, Blocker, R, Gangi, A, Ley, E, Blaha, J, Margulies, D, Wiegmann, DA, Starnes, B, Karl, C, Karl, R, Gewertz, BL & Catchpole, KR 2014, 'Flow disruptions during trauma care', World Journal of Surgery, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2306-0
Shouhed D, Blocker R, Gangi A, Ley E, Blaha J, Margulies D et al. Flow disruptions during trauma care. World Journal of Surgery. 2014 Feb 1;38(2):314-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2306-0
Shouhed, Daniel ; Blocker, Renaldo ; Gangi, Alex ; Ley, Eric ; Blaha, Jennifer ; Margulies, Daniel ; Wiegmann, Douglas A. ; Starnes, Ben ; Karl, Cathy ; Karl, Richard ; Gewertz, Bruce L. ; Catchpole, Ken R. / Flow disruptions during trauma care. In: World Journal of Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 314-321.
@article{ca5fc86042af437799b0745eb93a8e09,
title = "Flow disruptions during trauma care",
abstract = "Background: Flow disruptions (FDs) are deviations from the progression of care that compromise safety or efficiency. The frequency and specific causes of FDs remain poorly documented in trauma care. We undertook this study to identify and quantify the rate of FDs during various phases of trauma care. Methods: Seven trained observers studied a Level I trauma center over 2 months. Observers recorded details on FDs using a validated Tablet-PC data collection tool during various phases of care - trauma bay, imaging, operating room (OR) - and recorded work-system variables including breakdowns in communication and coordination, environmental distractions, equipment issues, and patient factors. Results: Researchers observed 86 trauma cases including 72 low-level and 14 high-level activations. Altogether, 1,759 FDs were recorded (20.4/case). High-level trauma comprised a significantly higher number (p = 0.0003) and rate of FDs (p = 0.0158) than low-level trauma. Across the three phases of trauma care, there was a significant effect on FD number (p < 0.0001) and FD rate (p = 0.0005), with the highest in the OR, followed by computed tomography. The highest rates of FD per case and per hour were related to breakdowns in coordination. Conclusions: This study is the largest direct observational study of the trauma process conducted to date. Complexities associated with the critical patient who arrives in the trauma bay lead to a high prevalence of disruptions related to breakdowns in coordination, communication, equipment issues, and environmental factors. Prospective observation allows individual hospitals to identify and analyze these systemic deficiencies. Appropriate interventions can then be evaluated to streamline the care provided to trauma patients.",
author = "Daniel Shouhed and Renaldo Blocker and Alex Gangi and Eric Ley and Jennifer Blaha and Daniel Margulies and Wiegmann, {Douglas A.} and Ben Starnes and Cathy Karl and Richard Karl and Gewertz, {Bruce L.} and Catchpole, {Ken R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-013-2306-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "314--321",
journal = "Presentations from the 9th Annual Electric Utilities Environmental Conference",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flow disruptions during trauma care

AU - Shouhed, Daniel

AU - Blocker, Renaldo

AU - Gangi, Alex

AU - Ley, Eric

AU - Blaha, Jennifer

AU - Margulies, Daniel

AU - Wiegmann, Douglas A.

AU - Starnes, Ben

AU - Karl, Cathy

AU - Karl, Richard

AU - Gewertz, Bruce L.

AU - Catchpole, Ken R.

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - Background: Flow disruptions (FDs) are deviations from the progression of care that compromise safety or efficiency. The frequency and specific causes of FDs remain poorly documented in trauma care. We undertook this study to identify and quantify the rate of FDs during various phases of trauma care. Methods: Seven trained observers studied a Level I trauma center over 2 months. Observers recorded details on FDs using a validated Tablet-PC data collection tool during various phases of care - trauma bay, imaging, operating room (OR) - and recorded work-system variables including breakdowns in communication and coordination, environmental distractions, equipment issues, and patient factors. Results: Researchers observed 86 trauma cases including 72 low-level and 14 high-level activations. Altogether, 1,759 FDs were recorded (20.4/case). High-level trauma comprised a significantly higher number (p = 0.0003) and rate of FDs (p = 0.0158) than low-level trauma. Across the three phases of trauma care, there was a significant effect on FD number (p < 0.0001) and FD rate (p = 0.0005), with the highest in the OR, followed by computed tomography. The highest rates of FD per case and per hour were related to breakdowns in coordination. Conclusions: This study is the largest direct observational study of the trauma process conducted to date. Complexities associated with the critical patient who arrives in the trauma bay lead to a high prevalence of disruptions related to breakdowns in coordination, communication, equipment issues, and environmental factors. Prospective observation allows individual hospitals to identify and analyze these systemic deficiencies. Appropriate interventions can then be evaluated to streamline the care provided to trauma patients.

AB - Background: Flow disruptions (FDs) are deviations from the progression of care that compromise safety or efficiency. The frequency and specific causes of FDs remain poorly documented in trauma care. We undertook this study to identify and quantify the rate of FDs during various phases of trauma care. Methods: Seven trained observers studied a Level I trauma center over 2 months. Observers recorded details on FDs using a validated Tablet-PC data collection tool during various phases of care - trauma bay, imaging, operating room (OR) - and recorded work-system variables including breakdowns in communication and coordination, environmental distractions, equipment issues, and patient factors. Results: Researchers observed 86 trauma cases including 72 low-level and 14 high-level activations. Altogether, 1,759 FDs were recorded (20.4/case). High-level trauma comprised a significantly higher number (p = 0.0003) and rate of FDs (p = 0.0158) than low-level trauma. Across the three phases of trauma care, there was a significant effect on FD number (p < 0.0001) and FD rate (p = 0.0005), with the highest in the OR, followed by computed tomography. The highest rates of FD per case and per hour were related to breakdowns in coordination. Conclusions: This study is the largest direct observational study of the trauma process conducted to date. Complexities associated with the critical patient who arrives in the trauma bay lead to a high prevalence of disruptions related to breakdowns in coordination, communication, equipment issues, and environmental factors. Prospective observation allows individual hospitals to identify and analyze these systemic deficiencies. Appropriate interventions can then be evaluated to streamline the care provided to trauma patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894903211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894903211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-013-2306-0

DO - 10.1007/s00268-013-2306-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 24178180

AN - SCOPUS:84894903211

VL - 38

SP - 314

EP - 321

JO - Presentations from the 9th Annual Electric Utilities Environmental Conference

JF - Presentations from the 9th Annual Electric Utilities Environmental Conference

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 2

ER -