Financial integration’s impact on care delivery and payment reforms: A survey of hospitals and physician practices

Elliott S. Fisher, Stephen M. Shortell, A. James O’malley, Taressa K. Fraze, Andrew Wood, Marisha Palm, Carrie H. Colla, Meredith B. Rosenthal, Hector P. Rodriguez, Valerie A. Lewis, Steven Woloshin, Nilay Shah, Ellen Meara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Health systems continue to grow in size. Financial integration—the ownership of hospitals or physician practices—often has anticompetitive effects that contribute to the higher prices for health care seen in the US. To determine whether the potential harms of financial integration are counterbalanced by improvements in quality, we surveyed nationally representative samples of hospitals (n = 739) and physician practices (n = 2,189), stratified according to whether they were independent or were owned by complex systems, simple systems, or medical groups. The surveys included nine scales measuring the level of adoption of diverse, quality-focused care delivery and payment reforms. Scores varied widely across hospitals and practices, but little of this variation was explained by ownership status. Quality scores favored financially integrated systems for four of nine hospital measures and one of nine practice measures, but in no case favored complex systems. Greater financial integration was generally not associated with better quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1302-1311
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Financial integration’s impact on care delivery and payment reforms: A survey of hospitals and physician practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this