Field of view comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopy

Jamie Van Gompel, Mark H. Tabor, A. Samy Youssef, Tsz Lau, Andrew P. Carlson, Harry R. Van Loveren, Siviero Agazzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis Relative to microscopic transnasal surgery, endoscopic surgery provides improved visualization with an increased field of view. Advances such as high-definition (HD) and three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy have been introduced and clearly improve visualization. However, do both technologies maintain an increased field of view? We hypothesize that the field of view of 3D endoscopy is restricted relative to two-dimensional (2D) HD endoscopy. Study Design Laboratory investigation, prospective case series. Methods Standard measurements at 6-cm and 2-cm working distances where made to determine the comparative field of view utilizing Storz 0° 2D HD and Visionsense 3D endoscopes. Relative measurements were then made to determine field of view. Five clinical patients were then utilized to confirm laboratory studies and demonstrate the relative field of view change. Results 3D endoscopy demonstrates a 52% loss of field of view compared to 2D endoscopy in a controlled lab testing. This was confirmed in a small clinical patient series where a 55% ± 3% relative field of view reduction was observed. Conclusions When working with 3D endoscopy in a currently available commercial product, the operator should be aware that relative to HD 2D endoscopy, there is a field of view restriction of 52%. Level of Evidence N/A.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-390
Number of pages4
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume124
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endoscopy
Endoscopes
Technology

Keywords

  • endoscope
  • Endoscopic skull base

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Van Gompel, J., Tabor, M. H., Youssef, A. S., Lau, T., Carlson, A. P., Van Loveren, H. R., & Agazzi, S. (2014). Field of view comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopy. Laryngoscope, 124(2), 387-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24222

Field of view comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopy. / Van Gompel, Jamie; Tabor, Mark H.; Youssef, A. Samy; Lau, Tsz; Carlson, Andrew P.; Van Loveren, Harry R.; Agazzi, Siviero.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 124, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 387-390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Gompel, J, Tabor, MH, Youssef, AS, Lau, T, Carlson, AP, Van Loveren, HR & Agazzi, S 2014, 'Field of view comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopy', Laryngoscope, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 387-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24222
Van Gompel J, Tabor MH, Youssef AS, Lau T, Carlson AP, Van Loveren HR et al. Field of view comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopy. Laryngoscope. 2014 Feb;124(2):387-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24222
Van Gompel, Jamie ; Tabor, Mark H. ; Youssef, A. Samy ; Lau, Tsz ; Carlson, Andrew P. ; Van Loveren, Harry R. ; Agazzi, Siviero. / Field of view comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopy. In: Laryngoscope. 2014 ; Vol. 124, No. 2. pp. 387-390.
@article{df7bf38dfb9240849f32cd249c8668d5,
title = "Field of view comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopy",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis Relative to microscopic transnasal surgery, endoscopic surgery provides improved visualization with an increased field of view. Advances such as high-definition (HD) and three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy have been introduced and clearly improve visualization. However, do both technologies maintain an increased field of view? We hypothesize that the field of view of 3D endoscopy is restricted relative to two-dimensional (2D) HD endoscopy. Study Design Laboratory investigation, prospective case series. Methods Standard measurements at 6-cm and 2-cm working distances where made to determine the comparative field of view utilizing Storz 0° 2D HD and Visionsense 3D endoscopes. Relative measurements were then made to determine field of view. Five clinical patients were then utilized to confirm laboratory studies and demonstrate the relative field of view change. Results 3D endoscopy demonstrates a 52{\%} loss of field of view compared to 2D endoscopy in a controlled lab testing. This was confirmed in a small clinical patient series where a 55{\%} ± 3{\%} relative field of view reduction was observed. Conclusions When working with 3D endoscopy in a currently available commercial product, the operator should be aware that relative to HD 2D endoscopy, there is a field of view restriction of 52{\%}. Level of Evidence N/A.",
keywords = "endoscope, Endoscopic skull base",
author = "{Van Gompel}, Jamie and Tabor, {Mark H.} and Youssef, {A. Samy} and Tsz Lau and Carlson, {Andrew P.} and {Van Loveren}, {Harry R.} and Siviero Agazzi",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/lary.24222",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "387--390",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field of view comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopy

AU - Van Gompel, Jamie

AU - Tabor, Mark H.

AU - Youssef, A. Samy

AU - Lau, Tsz

AU - Carlson, Andrew P.

AU - Van Loveren, Harry R.

AU - Agazzi, Siviero

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis Relative to microscopic transnasal surgery, endoscopic surgery provides improved visualization with an increased field of view. Advances such as high-definition (HD) and three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy have been introduced and clearly improve visualization. However, do both technologies maintain an increased field of view? We hypothesize that the field of view of 3D endoscopy is restricted relative to two-dimensional (2D) HD endoscopy. Study Design Laboratory investigation, prospective case series. Methods Standard measurements at 6-cm and 2-cm working distances where made to determine the comparative field of view utilizing Storz 0° 2D HD and Visionsense 3D endoscopes. Relative measurements were then made to determine field of view. Five clinical patients were then utilized to confirm laboratory studies and demonstrate the relative field of view change. Results 3D endoscopy demonstrates a 52% loss of field of view compared to 2D endoscopy in a controlled lab testing. This was confirmed in a small clinical patient series where a 55% ± 3% relative field of view reduction was observed. Conclusions When working with 3D endoscopy in a currently available commercial product, the operator should be aware that relative to HD 2D endoscopy, there is a field of view restriction of 52%. Level of Evidence N/A.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis Relative to microscopic transnasal surgery, endoscopic surgery provides improved visualization with an increased field of view. Advances such as high-definition (HD) and three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy have been introduced and clearly improve visualization. However, do both technologies maintain an increased field of view? We hypothesize that the field of view of 3D endoscopy is restricted relative to two-dimensional (2D) HD endoscopy. Study Design Laboratory investigation, prospective case series. Methods Standard measurements at 6-cm and 2-cm working distances where made to determine the comparative field of view utilizing Storz 0° 2D HD and Visionsense 3D endoscopes. Relative measurements were then made to determine field of view. Five clinical patients were then utilized to confirm laboratory studies and demonstrate the relative field of view change. Results 3D endoscopy demonstrates a 52% loss of field of view compared to 2D endoscopy in a controlled lab testing. This was confirmed in a small clinical patient series where a 55% ± 3% relative field of view reduction was observed. Conclusions When working with 3D endoscopy in a currently available commercial product, the operator should be aware that relative to HD 2D endoscopy, there is a field of view restriction of 52%. Level of Evidence N/A.

KW - endoscope

KW - Endoscopic skull base

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892924531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892924531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.24222

DO - 10.1002/lary.24222

M3 - Article

C2 - 23712924

AN - SCOPUS:84892924531

VL - 124

SP - 387

EP - 390

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 2

ER -