Feasibility of a randomised trial of a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making on the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care: The DECISION+ pilot trial

Annie LeBlanc, France Légaré, Michel Labrecque, Gaston Godin, Robert Thivierge, Claudine Laurier, Luc Côté, Annette M. O'Connor, Michel Rousseau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The misuse and limited effectiveness of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are well documented, and current approaches targeting physicians or patients to improve appropriate use have had limited effect. Shared decision-making could be a promising strategy to improve appropriate antibiotic use for ARIs, but very little is known about its implementation processes and outcomes in clinical settings. In this matter, pilot studies have played a key role in health science research over the past years in providing information for the planning, justification, and/or refinement of larger studies. The objective of our study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the study design, procedures, and intervention of the DECISION+ program, a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making among family physicians and their patients on the optimal use of antibiotics for treating ARIs in primary care.Methods: A pilot clustered randomised trial was conducted. Family medicine groups (FMGs) were randomly assigned, to either the DECISION+ program, which included three 3-hour workshops over a four- to six-month period, or a control group that had a delayed exposure to the program.Results: Among 21 FMGs contacted, 5 (24%) agreed to participate in the pilot study. A total of 39 family physicians (18 in the two experimental and 21 in the three control FMGs) and their 544 patients consulting for an ARI were recruited. The proportion of recruited family physicians who participated in all three workshops was 46% (50% for the experimental group and 43% for the control group), and the overall mean level of satisfaction regarding the workshops was 94%.Conclusions: This trial, while aiming to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a larger study, has identified important opportunities for improving the design of a definitive trial. This pilot trial is informative for researchers and clinicians interested in designing and/or conducting studies with FMGs regarding training of physicians in shared decision-making. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.Gov NCT00354315.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number5
JournalImplementation Science
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 18 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Continuing Medical Education
Respiratory Tract Infections
Primary Health Care
Decision Making
Family Physicians
Medicine
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Education
Physicians
Control Groups
Feasibility Studies
Research Personnel
Health
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Feasibility of a randomised trial of a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making on the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care : The DECISION+ pilot trial. / LeBlanc, Annie; Légaré, France; Labrecque, Michel; Godin, Gaston; Thivierge, Robert; Laurier, Claudine; Côté, Luc; O'Connor, Annette M.; Rousseau, Michel.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, 5, 18.01.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

LeBlanc, Annie ; Légaré, France ; Labrecque, Michel ; Godin, Gaston ; Thivierge, Robert ; Laurier, Claudine ; Côté, Luc ; O'Connor, Annette M. ; Rousseau, Michel. / Feasibility of a randomised trial of a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making on the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care : The DECISION+ pilot trial. In: Implementation Science. 2011 ; Vol. 6, No. 1.
@article{2fc93b2a8c6e4d63933721d31e22e01f,
title = "Feasibility of a randomised trial of a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making on the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care: The DECISION+ pilot trial",
abstract = "Background: The misuse and limited effectiveness of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are well documented, and current approaches targeting physicians or patients to improve appropriate use have had limited effect. Shared decision-making could be a promising strategy to improve appropriate antibiotic use for ARIs, but very little is known about its implementation processes and outcomes in clinical settings. In this matter, pilot studies have played a key role in health science research over the past years in providing information for the planning, justification, and/or refinement of larger studies. The objective of our study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the study design, procedures, and intervention of the DECISION+ program, a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making among family physicians and their patients on the optimal use of antibiotics for treating ARIs in primary care.Methods: A pilot clustered randomised trial was conducted. Family medicine groups (FMGs) were randomly assigned, to either the DECISION+ program, which included three 3-hour workshops over a four- to six-month period, or a control group that had a delayed exposure to the program.Results: Among 21 FMGs contacted, 5 (24{\%}) agreed to participate in the pilot study. A total of 39 family physicians (18 in the two experimental and 21 in the three control FMGs) and their 544 patients consulting for an ARI were recruited. The proportion of recruited family physicians who participated in all three workshops was 46{\%} (50{\%} for the experimental group and 43{\%} for the control group), and the overall mean level of satisfaction regarding the workshops was 94{\%}.Conclusions: This trial, while aiming to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a larger study, has identified important opportunities for improving the design of a definitive trial. This pilot trial is informative for researchers and clinicians interested in designing and/or conducting studies with FMGs regarding training of physicians in shared decision-making. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.Gov NCT00354315.",
author = "Annie LeBlanc and France L{\'e}gar{\'e} and Michel Labrecque and Gaston Godin and Robert Thivierge and Claudine Laurier and Luc C{\^o}t{\'e} and O'Connor, {Annette M.} and Michel Rousseau",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1186/1748-5908-6-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of a randomised trial of a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making on the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care

T2 - The DECISION+ pilot trial

AU - LeBlanc, Annie

AU - Légaré, France

AU - Labrecque, Michel

AU - Godin, Gaston

AU - Thivierge, Robert

AU - Laurier, Claudine

AU - Côté, Luc

AU - O'Connor, Annette M.

AU - Rousseau, Michel

PY - 2011/1/18

Y1 - 2011/1/18

N2 - Background: The misuse and limited effectiveness of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are well documented, and current approaches targeting physicians or patients to improve appropriate use have had limited effect. Shared decision-making could be a promising strategy to improve appropriate antibiotic use for ARIs, but very little is known about its implementation processes and outcomes in clinical settings. In this matter, pilot studies have played a key role in health science research over the past years in providing information for the planning, justification, and/or refinement of larger studies. The objective of our study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the study design, procedures, and intervention of the DECISION+ program, a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making among family physicians and their patients on the optimal use of antibiotics for treating ARIs in primary care.Methods: A pilot clustered randomised trial was conducted. Family medicine groups (FMGs) were randomly assigned, to either the DECISION+ program, which included three 3-hour workshops over a four- to six-month period, or a control group that had a delayed exposure to the program.Results: Among 21 FMGs contacted, 5 (24%) agreed to participate in the pilot study. A total of 39 family physicians (18 in the two experimental and 21 in the three control FMGs) and their 544 patients consulting for an ARI were recruited. The proportion of recruited family physicians who participated in all three workshops was 46% (50% for the experimental group and 43% for the control group), and the overall mean level of satisfaction regarding the workshops was 94%.Conclusions: This trial, while aiming to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a larger study, has identified important opportunities for improving the design of a definitive trial. This pilot trial is informative for researchers and clinicians interested in designing and/or conducting studies with FMGs regarding training of physicians in shared decision-making. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.Gov NCT00354315.

AB - Background: The misuse and limited effectiveness of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are well documented, and current approaches targeting physicians or patients to improve appropriate use have had limited effect. Shared decision-making could be a promising strategy to improve appropriate antibiotic use for ARIs, but very little is known about its implementation processes and outcomes in clinical settings. In this matter, pilot studies have played a key role in health science research over the past years in providing information for the planning, justification, and/or refinement of larger studies. The objective of our study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the study design, procedures, and intervention of the DECISION+ program, a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making among family physicians and their patients on the optimal use of antibiotics for treating ARIs in primary care.Methods: A pilot clustered randomised trial was conducted. Family medicine groups (FMGs) were randomly assigned, to either the DECISION+ program, which included three 3-hour workshops over a four- to six-month period, or a control group that had a delayed exposure to the program.Results: Among 21 FMGs contacted, 5 (24%) agreed to participate in the pilot study. A total of 39 family physicians (18 in the two experimental and 21 in the three control FMGs) and their 544 patients consulting for an ARI were recruited. The proportion of recruited family physicians who participated in all three workshops was 46% (50% for the experimental group and 43% for the control group), and the overall mean level of satisfaction regarding the workshops was 94%.Conclusions: This trial, while aiming to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a larger study, has identified important opportunities for improving the design of a definitive trial. This pilot trial is informative for researchers and clinicians interested in designing and/or conducting studies with FMGs regarding training of physicians in shared decision-making. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.Gov NCT00354315.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751596585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751596585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-6-5

DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-6-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 21241514

AN - SCOPUS:78751596585

VL - 6

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

IS - 1

M1 - 5

ER -