Family and neighborhood income: Additive and multiplicative associations with youths' well-being

R. A. Gordon, Courtenay Savage, Benjamin B. Lahey, Sherryl H. Goodman, Peter S. Jensen, Maritza Rubio-Stipec, Christina W. Hoven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study extends prior research on additive and multiplicative ways by which family and neighborhood income relate to youths' well-being. Integrating substantive and methodological concepts, we demonstrate how various hypotheses would be revealed empirically with continuous income measures and clarify the relationship among different conceptual models. Substantively, we highlight ways in which match and mismatch between family and neighborhood income may encourage positive or negative social comparisons and may influence youths' ability to participate in social networks and to access enriching resources. We illustrate these models using a sample of 877 primarily white boys and girls representatively drawn from three US communities. We find that youths' receptive vocabulary is more strongly positively related to income in one context (family or neighborhood) when income is low in the other context (neighborhood or family), particularly for white children. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and impairment of daily functioning are highest among youth who live in contexts where their families' financial circumstances are advantaged or deprived in relation to their neighbors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-219
Number of pages29
JournalSocial Science Research
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2003

Keywords

  • Adolescent development
  • Child development
  • Income inequality
  • Neighborhoods
  • Statistical interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Family and neighborhood income: Additive and multiplicative associations with youths' well-being'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this