False-negative and false-positive ECG diagnoses of Q wave myocardial infarction in the presence of right bundle-branch block

Ihor Gussak, R. Scott Wright, Preben Bjerregaard, Bernard R. Chaitman, Sophia H. Zhou, Stephen C. Hammill, Stephen L. Kopecky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Right bundle-branch block (RBBB) has not traditionally been seen as an obstacle to ECG diagnosis of Q wave myocardial infarction (MI) - in clinical electrocardiography and vectorcardiography - because this conduction disturbance is not believed to cause significant alterations in the spatial orientation of initial excitation wavefronts. In the era of large-scale clinical trials, however, where serial ECG analysis is among the major diagnostic tools in MI classification, both false-positive and false-negative diagnoses of MI in the presence of RBBB have become increasingly evident. Because of the limited detectability of Q wave MI by ECG in the presence of RBBB, the electrocardiographic finding of Q wave MI should not be regarded as an independent diagnostic tool. It is best to utilize independent corroboration to establish the diagnosis of transmural infarction when RBBB is present. Further investigations are warranted to better delineate sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of Q wave MI in the presence of RBBB.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-172
Number of pages8
JournalCardiology
Volume94
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • Q wave myocardial infarction
  • Right bundle-branch block

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'False-negative and false-positive ECG diagnoses of Q wave myocardial infarction in the presence of right bundle-branch block'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this