Ergonomic comparison of laparoscopic hand instruments in a single site surgery simulator with novices

Jakeb D. Riggle, Emily E. Miller, Bernadette McCrory, Alex Meitl, Eric Lim, Susan Hallbeck, Chad A. Lagrange

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Single-site surgery improves cosmesis but increases procedural difficulty. Enhanced instruments could improve procedural efficiency leading to better patient outcomes. Material and methods: One pair of non-articulating (straight) and two different pairs of articulating laparoscopic instruments were evaluated using a peg-transfer surgical task simulator by premedical college students. The instruments were comparatively tested using task performance measures, ergonomic measures, and participant questionnaires. Results: The straight instrument produced significantly higher task performance scores and lower task times compared to both articulating instruments (p < 0.05). The straight instrument required less muscle activation and less wrist deviation than the articulating instruments to perform the same task. Participants rated the straight instrument significantly easier to use and less difficult to complete the task than with either articulating instrument (p < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that novices have difficulty using articulating instruments and perform better using straight laparoscopic instruments when first attempting LESS surgical tasks. Although a study with post-graduate medical trainees is needed to confirm these results, trainees should initially practice LESS with non-articulating instruments to gain proficiency at basic laparoscopic tasks. Additionally, redesigning articulating instruments to specifically address the spatial constraints and learning curve of LESS may also improve trainee performance and instrument usability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-76
Number of pages9
JournalMinimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2014

Fingerprint

Human Engineering
Task Performance and Analysis
Premedical Students
Hand
Learning Curve
Wrist
Efficiency
Muscles
Surveys and Questionnaires
Transfer (Psychology)
Spatial Learning

Keywords

  • Ergonomics
  • SILS
  • Simulation
  • Single access laparoscopic surgery laparoscopic instruments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Ergonomic comparison of laparoscopic hand instruments in a single site surgery simulator with novices. / Riggle, Jakeb D.; Miller, Emily E.; McCrory, Bernadette; Meitl, Alex; Lim, Eric; Hallbeck, Susan; Lagrange, Chad A.

In: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.04.2014, p. 68-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Riggle, Jakeb D. ; Miller, Emily E. ; McCrory, Bernadette ; Meitl, Alex ; Lim, Eric ; Hallbeck, Susan ; Lagrange, Chad A. / Ergonomic comparison of laparoscopic hand instruments in a single site surgery simulator with novices. In: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 68-76.
@article{880fa08153354ba89c9eb478aa339116,
title = "Ergonomic comparison of laparoscopic hand instruments in a single site surgery simulator with novices",
abstract = "Background: Single-site surgery improves cosmesis but increases procedural difficulty. Enhanced instruments could improve procedural efficiency leading to better patient outcomes. Material and methods: One pair of non-articulating (straight) and two different pairs of articulating laparoscopic instruments were evaluated using a peg-transfer surgical task simulator by premedical college students. The instruments were comparatively tested using task performance measures, ergonomic measures, and participant questionnaires. Results: The straight instrument produced significantly higher task performance scores and lower task times compared to both articulating instruments (p < 0.05). The straight instrument required less muscle activation and less wrist deviation than the articulating instruments to perform the same task. Participants rated the straight instrument significantly easier to use and less difficult to complete the task than with either articulating instrument (p < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that novices have difficulty using articulating instruments and perform better using straight laparoscopic instruments when first attempting LESS surgical tasks. Although a study with post-graduate medical trainees is needed to confirm these results, trainees should initially practice LESS with non-articulating instruments to gain proficiency at basic laparoscopic tasks. Additionally, redesigning articulating instruments to specifically address the spatial constraints and learning curve of LESS may also improve trainee performance and instrument usability.",
keywords = "Ergonomics, SILS, Simulation, Single access laparoscopic surgery laparoscopic instruments",
author = "Riggle, {Jakeb D.} and Miller, {Emily E.} and Bernadette McCrory and Alex Meitl and Eric Lim and Susan Hallbeck and Lagrange, {Chad A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/13645706.2014.946426",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "68--76",
journal = "Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies",
issn = "1364-5706",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ergonomic comparison of laparoscopic hand instruments in a single site surgery simulator with novices

AU - Riggle, Jakeb D.

AU - Miller, Emily E.

AU - McCrory, Bernadette

AU - Meitl, Alex

AU - Lim, Eric

AU - Hallbeck, Susan

AU - Lagrange, Chad A.

PY - 2014/4/1

Y1 - 2014/4/1

N2 - Background: Single-site surgery improves cosmesis but increases procedural difficulty. Enhanced instruments could improve procedural efficiency leading to better patient outcomes. Material and methods: One pair of non-articulating (straight) and two different pairs of articulating laparoscopic instruments were evaluated using a peg-transfer surgical task simulator by premedical college students. The instruments were comparatively tested using task performance measures, ergonomic measures, and participant questionnaires. Results: The straight instrument produced significantly higher task performance scores and lower task times compared to both articulating instruments (p < 0.05). The straight instrument required less muscle activation and less wrist deviation than the articulating instruments to perform the same task. Participants rated the straight instrument significantly easier to use and less difficult to complete the task than with either articulating instrument (p < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that novices have difficulty using articulating instruments and perform better using straight laparoscopic instruments when first attempting LESS surgical tasks. Although a study with post-graduate medical trainees is needed to confirm these results, trainees should initially practice LESS with non-articulating instruments to gain proficiency at basic laparoscopic tasks. Additionally, redesigning articulating instruments to specifically address the spatial constraints and learning curve of LESS may also improve trainee performance and instrument usability.

AB - Background: Single-site surgery improves cosmesis but increases procedural difficulty. Enhanced instruments could improve procedural efficiency leading to better patient outcomes. Material and methods: One pair of non-articulating (straight) and two different pairs of articulating laparoscopic instruments were evaluated using a peg-transfer surgical task simulator by premedical college students. The instruments were comparatively tested using task performance measures, ergonomic measures, and participant questionnaires. Results: The straight instrument produced significantly higher task performance scores and lower task times compared to both articulating instruments (p < 0.05). The straight instrument required less muscle activation and less wrist deviation than the articulating instruments to perform the same task. Participants rated the straight instrument significantly easier to use and less difficult to complete the task than with either articulating instrument (p < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that novices have difficulty using articulating instruments and perform better using straight laparoscopic instruments when first attempting LESS surgical tasks. Although a study with post-graduate medical trainees is needed to confirm these results, trainees should initially practice LESS with non-articulating instruments to gain proficiency at basic laparoscopic tasks. Additionally, redesigning articulating instruments to specifically address the spatial constraints and learning curve of LESS may also improve trainee performance and instrument usability.

KW - Ergonomics

KW - SILS

KW - Simulation

KW - Single access laparoscopic surgery laparoscopic instruments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924777891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924777891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/13645706.2014.946426

DO - 10.3109/13645706.2014.946426

M3 - Article

C2 - 25142199

AN - SCOPUS:84924777891

VL - 24

SP - 68

EP - 76

JO - Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies

JF - Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies

SN - 1364-5706

IS - 2

ER -