TY - JOUR
T1 - Eosinophilia myalgia syndrome
T2 - I. Immunocytochemical evidence for a T‐cell–mediated immune effector response
AU - Emslie‐Smith, Alison M.
AU - Engel, Andrew G.
AU - Duffy, Joseph
AU - Bowles, Carolyn A.
PY - 1991/5
Y1 - 1991/5
N2 - Specimens of muscle and fascia from 13 patients fulfilling the Centers for Disease Control criteria for the eosinophilia myalgia syndrome (EMS) were studied by quantitative immunocytochemical analysis. The immunolocalization of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD22, and CD56 markers, the γδ T‐cell receptor, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I complex and class II antigens, and complement membrane attack complex (MAC) were examined. The distribution and relative proportions of T cells and T‐cell subsets, B cells, macrophages, and eosinophils were determined at perivascular, perimysial, endomysial, and fascial sites of accumulation. At all sites, T cells were predominant, CD8+ cells outnumbered CD4+ cells 6‐ to 20‐fold, and between 60 and 80% of T cells were activated. B cells and eosinophils each accounted for less than 3% of inflammatory cells. Very few cells expressed either the γδ T‐cell receptor or natural killer cell markers. As in dermatomyositis (DM), MHC class I antigen complex expression was increased on many structurally normal muscle fibers, but in contrast to DM, microvascular MAC deposits were not a feature of EMS. The findings implicate a cellular immune response directed against a connective tissue component in EMS.
AB - Specimens of muscle and fascia from 13 patients fulfilling the Centers for Disease Control criteria for the eosinophilia myalgia syndrome (EMS) were studied by quantitative immunocytochemical analysis. The immunolocalization of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD22, and CD56 markers, the γδ T‐cell receptor, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I complex and class II antigens, and complement membrane attack complex (MAC) were examined. The distribution and relative proportions of T cells and T‐cell subsets, B cells, macrophages, and eosinophils were determined at perivascular, perimysial, endomysial, and fascial sites of accumulation. At all sites, T cells were predominant, CD8+ cells outnumbered CD4+ cells 6‐ to 20‐fold, and between 60 and 80% of T cells were activated. B cells and eosinophils each accounted for less than 3% of inflammatory cells. Very few cells expressed either the γδ T‐cell receptor or natural killer cell markers. As in dermatomyositis (DM), MHC class I antigen complex expression was increased on many structurally normal muscle fibers, but in contrast to DM, microvascular MAC deposits were not a feature of EMS. The findings implicate a cellular immune response directed against a connective tissue component in EMS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025847313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025847313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ana.410290512
DO - 10.1002/ana.410290512
M3 - Article
C2 - 1859182
AN - SCOPUS:0025847313
SN - 0364-5134
VL - 29
SP - 524
EP - 528
JO - Annals of Neurology
JF - Annals of Neurology
IS - 5
ER -