Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables: Is reactivity a problem?

Leslie A. Aaron, Judith A. Turner, Lloyd Mancl, Heather Brister, Craig Sawchuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reactive measures (measures that change the phenomenon assessed) cause problems in interpreting any changes observed. This study examined whether electronic daily diary measures of pain, activity interference, mood, and pain beliefs were reactive in terms of both observable data and patient-reported effects. Patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain (N = 71, 86% female) completed electronic diaries 3 times daily for approximately 2 weeks and subsequently reported perceived effects on symptom-related variables. Seventy-three percent of patients reported that the assessment affected their pain, whereas 51%, 45%, and 39% thought that it affected their daily activities, mood, and beliefs, respectively. In contrast, there was little objective evidence of reactivity as observed in the electronic diary ratings; changes over 14 days were small (eg, predicted changes on 0 to 10 scales: positive mood, .1; pain, -.3; perceived control, -.5) and not statistically significant. Subjective reactivity was generally not significantly related to objective reactivity. The data suggest that patients view daily assessment as having positive and negative effects on pain-related variables, but pain-related measures do not show reactive effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-115
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Pain
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pain Measurement
Pain
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Daily electronic interviews
  • Reactivity
  • Temporomandibular disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables : Is reactivity a problem? / Aaron, Leslie A.; Turner, Judith A.; Mancl, Lloyd; Brister, Heather; Sawchuk, Craig.

In: Journal of Pain, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.02.2005, p. 107-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aaron, Leslie A. ; Turner, Judith A. ; Mancl, Lloyd ; Brister, Heather ; Sawchuk, Craig. / Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables : Is reactivity a problem?. In: Journal of Pain. 2005 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 107-115.
@article{5140da432361432cbe1a48ebbaffa8e1,
title = "Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables: Is reactivity a problem?",
abstract = "Reactive measures (measures that change the phenomenon assessed) cause problems in interpreting any changes observed. This study examined whether electronic daily diary measures of pain, activity interference, mood, and pain beliefs were reactive in terms of both observable data and patient-reported effects. Patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain (N = 71, 86{\%} female) completed electronic diaries 3 times daily for approximately 2 weeks and subsequently reported perceived effects on symptom-related variables. Seventy-three percent of patients reported that the assessment affected their pain, whereas 51{\%}, 45{\%}, and 39{\%} thought that it affected their daily activities, mood, and beliefs, respectively. In contrast, there was little objective evidence of reactivity as observed in the electronic diary ratings; changes over 14 days were small (eg, predicted changes on 0 to 10 scales: positive mood, .1; pain, -.3; perceived control, -.5) and not statistically significant. Subjective reactivity was generally not significantly related to objective reactivity. The data suggest that patients view daily assessment as having positive and negative effects on pain-related variables, but pain-related measures do not show reactive effects.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, Daily electronic interviews, Reactivity, Temporomandibular disorders",
author = "Aaron, {Leslie A.} and Turner, {Judith A.} and Lloyd Mancl and Heather Brister and Craig Sawchuk",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpain.2004.11.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "107--115",
journal = "Journal of Pain",
issn = "1526-5900",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables

T2 - Is reactivity a problem?

AU - Aaron, Leslie A.

AU - Turner, Judith A.

AU - Mancl, Lloyd

AU - Brister, Heather

AU - Sawchuk, Craig

PY - 2005/2/1

Y1 - 2005/2/1

N2 - Reactive measures (measures that change the phenomenon assessed) cause problems in interpreting any changes observed. This study examined whether electronic daily diary measures of pain, activity interference, mood, and pain beliefs were reactive in terms of both observable data and patient-reported effects. Patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain (N = 71, 86% female) completed electronic diaries 3 times daily for approximately 2 weeks and subsequently reported perceived effects on symptom-related variables. Seventy-three percent of patients reported that the assessment affected their pain, whereas 51%, 45%, and 39% thought that it affected their daily activities, mood, and beliefs, respectively. In contrast, there was little objective evidence of reactivity as observed in the electronic diary ratings; changes over 14 days were small (eg, predicted changes on 0 to 10 scales: positive mood, .1; pain, -.3; perceived control, -.5) and not statistically significant. Subjective reactivity was generally not significantly related to objective reactivity. The data suggest that patients view daily assessment as having positive and negative effects on pain-related variables, but pain-related measures do not show reactive effects.

AB - Reactive measures (measures that change the phenomenon assessed) cause problems in interpreting any changes observed. This study examined whether electronic daily diary measures of pain, activity interference, mood, and pain beliefs were reactive in terms of both observable data and patient-reported effects. Patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain (N = 71, 86% female) completed electronic diaries 3 times daily for approximately 2 weeks and subsequently reported perceived effects on symptom-related variables. Seventy-three percent of patients reported that the assessment affected their pain, whereas 51%, 45%, and 39% thought that it affected their daily activities, mood, and beliefs, respectively. In contrast, there was little objective evidence of reactivity as observed in the electronic diary ratings; changes over 14 days were small (eg, predicted changes on 0 to 10 scales: positive mood, .1; pain, -.3; perceived control, -.5) and not statistically significant. Subjective reactivity was generally not significantly related to objective reactivity. The data suggest that patients view daily assessment as having positive and negative effects on pain-related variables, but pain-related measures do not show reactive effects.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Daily electronic interviews

KW - Reactivity

KW - Temporomandibular disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13444261099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13444261099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.11.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 15694877

AN - SCOPUS:13444261099

VL - 6

SP - 107

EP - 115

JO - Journal of Pain

JF - Journal of Pain

SN - 1526-5900

IS - 2

ER -