TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy from systemic hypertension on systolic function assessed by midwall shortening (HOT echocardiographic study)
AU - Zabalgoitia, Miguel
AU - Rahman, S. Noor Ur
AU - Haley, William E.
AU - Yarows, Steven
AU - Krause, Lisa
AU - Anderson, Lori C.
AU - Oraby, Mohamed A.
AU - Amarena, John
PY - 2001/9/1
Y1 - 2001/9/1
N2 - Depressed midwall shortening has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbid events in hypertensive patients with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy despite normal endocardial fractional shortening. The effects of LV mass changes in hypertensive patients on midwall shortening are unclear. To determine the impact of LV hypertrophy regression on LV systolic function assessed at the endocardium and the midwall level, 508 patients (58% men, 57% Caucasians, mean age 60 ± 7 years) participating in the Hypertension Optimal Treatment study were prospectively studied by serial echocardiography at baseline, year 1, year 2, and at the end of the study. The Hypertension Optimal Treatment study was designed to challenge the existence of the J-curve phenomenon in hypertension. This study enrolled men and women between 50 and 80 years of age with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients were treated with a regimen based on felodipine with the addition of other antihypertensive drug classes as needed to reduce the diastolic blood pressure to a predefined target of ≤80, ≤85, or ≤90 mm Hg. From baseline to year 1, year 2, and end of the study, body mass index was unchanged (30.4, 30.1, 30.2, and 30.5 kg/m2); however, diastolic blood pressure was significantly reduced (99, 83, 80, and 80 mm Hg, p <0.0001), as was systolic blood pressure (161, 139, 137, and 134 mm Hg, p <0.0001) and LV mass index (117, 119, 107, and 106 g/m2, p <0.0001). Over the same period of observation the endocardial fractional shortening did not change significantly (40%, 42%, 43%, and 44%); however, shortening at the midwall level showed improvement (20%, 21%, 22%, and 30%, p <0.001). In conclusion, midwall shortening is a more sensitive index of systolic function in subjects with pressure-overload hypertrophy, and it identifies high-risk patients who may benefit from a more aggressive antihypertensive program. The disparity between midwall and endocardial shortening suggests reduced myofibril function in patients with hypertension-induced hypertrophy.
AB - Depressed midwall shortening has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbid events in hypertensive patients with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy despite normal endocardial fractional shortening. The effects of LV mass changes in hypertensive patients on midwall shortening are unclear. To determine the impact of LV hypertrophy regression on LV systolic function assessed at the endocardium and the midwall level, 508 patients (58% men, 57% Caucasians, mean age 60 ± 7 years) participating in the Hypertension Optimal Treatment study were prospectively studied by serial echocardiography at baseline, year 1, year 2, and at the end of the study. The Hypertension Optimal Treatment study was designed to challenge the existence of the J-curve phenomenon in hypertension. This study enrolled men and women between 50 and 80 years of age with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients were treated with a regimen based on felodipine with the addition of other antihypertensive drug classes as needed to reduce the diastolic blood pressure to a predefined target of ≤80, ≤85, or ≤90 mm Hg. From baseline to year 1, year 2, and end of the study, body mass index was unchanged (30.4, 30.1, 30.2, and 30.5 kg/m2); however, diastolic blood pressure was significantly reduced (99, 83, 80, and 80 mm Hg, p <0.0001), as was systolic blood pressure (161, 139, 137, and 134 mm Hg, p <0.0001) and LV mass index (117, 119, 107, and 106 g/m2, p <0.0001). Over the same period of observation the endocardial fractional shortening did not change significantly (40%, 42%, 43%, and 44%); however, shortening at the midwall level showed improvement (20%, 21%, 22%, and 30%, p <0.001). In conclusion, midwall shortening is a more sensitive index of systolic function in subjects with pressure-overload hypertrophy, and it identifies high-risk patients who may benefit from a more aggressive antihypertensive program. The disparity between midwall and endocardial shortening suggests reduced myofibril function in patients with hypertension-induced hypertrophy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035451359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035451359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01730-1
DO - 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01730-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 11524061
AN - SCOPUS:0035451359
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 88
SP - 521
EP - 525
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 5
ER -