TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty on gastric emptying, motility and hormones
T2 - A comparative prospective study
AU - Vargas, Eric J.
AU - Rizk, Monika
AU - Gomez-Villa, Jacky
AU - Edwards, Phillip K.
AU - Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
AU - Storm, Andrew C.
AU - Acosta, Andres
AU - Lake, David
AU - Fidler, Jeff Lynn
AU - Bharucha, Adil E.
AU - Camilleri, Michael
AU - Abu Dayyeh, Barham K
N1 - Funding Information:
MC: grant R01-DK67071 from National Institutes of Health (NIH) for studies in obesity. AEB: grant R01-DK78924 from NIH. The study was made possible by CTSA grant number UL1-TR002377 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of NIH.
Funding Information:
ACS: research grant support from Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS and Enterasense. Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, ERBE, GI Dynamics, Intuitive and Olympus; AA: stockholder in Gila Therapeutics, Phenomix Sciences; consultant fees from Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, General Mills; BKAD: consulting fee from Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Metamodix and BFKW; consulting fee and grant/research support from USGI, Cairn Diagnostics, Aspire Bariatrics and Boston Scientific; speaker honorarium from Olympus and Johnson and Johnson; speaker honorarium and grant/research support from Medtronic and EndoGastric Solutions; and research support/grant from Apollo Endosurgery and Spatz Medical; MC: advisor to Phenomics Sciences, holder of stock options.
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has gained global adoption but our understanding of its mechanism(s) of action and durability of efficacy is limited. We sought to determine changes in gastric emptying (GE), gastric motility (GM), hormones and eating behaviours after ESG. Design: A priori-designed single-centre substudy of a large US randomised clinical trial, adults with obesity were randomised to ESG or lifestyle interventions (LS) alone. We measured GE, hormones and weight loss and assessed eating behaviours. In a subset of ESG patients, we assessed GM. The primary outcome was the change in T1/2 (min) at 3 months, and secondary outcomes were changes in weight, GE, GM, hormones and eating behaviours. We used t-Test analyses and regression to determine the association between GE and weight loss. Results: 36 (ESG=18; LS=18) participated in this substudy. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 3 months, T1/2 was delayed in the ESG group (n=17) compared with the LS group (n=17) (152.3±47.3 vs 89.1±27.9; p<0.001). At 12 months, T1/2 remained delayed in the ESG group (n=16) vs control group (n=14) (137±37.4 vs 90.1±23.4; p<0.001). Greater delays in GE at 3 months were associated with greater weight loss. GM was preserved and fasting ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide 1 and polypeptide YY significantly increased 18 months after ESG. Conclusion: ESG promotes weight loss through several key mechanistic pathways involving GE and hormones while preserving GM. These findings further support clinical adoption of this technique for the management of obesity. Trial registration number: NCT03406975.
AB - Objective: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has gained global adoption but our understanding of its mechanism(s) of action and durability of efficacy is limited. We sought to determine changes in gastric emptying (GE), gastric motility (GM), hormones and eating behaviours after ESG. Design: A priori-designed single-centre substudy of a large US randomised clinical trial, adults with obesity were randomised to ESG or lifestyle interventions (LS) alone. We measured GE, hormones and weight loss and assessed eating behaviours. In a subset of ESG patients, we assessed GM. The primary outcome was the change in T1/2 (min) at 3 months, and secondary outcomes were changes in weight, GE, GM, hormones and eating behaviours. We used t-Test analyses and regression to determine the association between GE and weight loss. Results: 36 (ESG=18; LS=18) participated in this substudy. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 3 months, T1/2 was delayed in the ESG group (n=17) compared with the LS group (n=17) (152.3±47.3 vs 89.1±27.9; p<0.001). At 12 months, T1/2 remained delayed in the ESG group (n=16) vs control group (n=14) (137±37.4 vs 90.1±23.4; p<0.001). Greater delays in GE at 3 months were associated with greater weight loss. GM was preserved and fasting ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide 1 and polypeptide YY significantly increased 18 months after ESG. Conclusion: ESG promotes weight loss through several key mechanistic pathways involving GE and hormones while preserving GM. These findings further support clinical adoption of this technique for the management of obesity. Trial registration number: NCT03406975.
KW - gastric emptying
KW - obesity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142446813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142446813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327816
DO - 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327816
M3 - Article
C2 - 36241388
AN - SCOPUS:85142446813
JO - Gut
JF - Gut
SN - 0017-5749
M1 - 327816
ER -