Effect of CREST findings on carotid revascularization practice in the United States

Jennifer S McDonald, Robert McDonald, Jiaquan Fan, Giuseppe Lanzino, David F Kallmes, Harry J. Cloft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background We sought to measure the impact of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) findings on clinical practice by studying trends in carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) utilization before and after publication of CREST in a large US multihospital database. Methods The Premier Perspective Database was used to identify inpatient CEA and CAS procedures performed from January 2006 to March 2013. Patients were subclassified by age (<70/≥70 years) and presentation (symptomatic/asymptomatic). CEA and CAS volumes were compared before and after the publication of CREST (July 2010) using an interrupted time series model. Results A total of 121,157 CEA and 18,503 CAS procedures performed at 445 medical centers were identified. There was no significant change observed in the overall number of CEA procedures performed after CREST publication relative to the pre-existing trend (P =.08); however, there was a significant increase in the overall number of CAS procedures performed (delta of 40 cases, P =.0179) in patients aged younger than 70 years (delta of 24 cases, P =.0008), 70 years or older (delta of 25 cases, P =.0047), and asymptomatic patients (delta of 39 cases, P =.0159). The overall percentage of CEA procedures performed in relation to all revascularization procedures was significantly lower after CREST publication overall (delta, -1.5%; P =.041) for patients aged younger than 70 years (delta, -2.4%; P <.0001) and asymptomatic patients (delta, -1.5%; P =.035). Conclusions In this large sample of US hospitals, performance of CAS significantly increased after the publication of the CREST study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1390-1396
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Carotid Endarterectomy
Carotid Arteries
Publications
Databases
Inpatients

Keywords

  • carotid artery stenting
  • carotid endarterectomy
  • Carotid stenosis
  • utilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Rehabilitation
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Effect of CREST findings on carotid revascularization practice in the United States. / McDonald, Jennifer S; McDonald, Robert; Fan, Jiaquan; Lanzino, Giuseppe; Kallmes, David F; Cloft, Harry J.

In: Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 24, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 1390-1396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2a61f2c6db58421d926aeb0091668010,
title = "Effect of CREST findings on carotid revascularization practice in the United States",
abstract = "Background We sought to measure the impact of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) findings on clinical practice by studying trends in carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) utilization before and after publication of CREST in a large US multihospital database. Methods The Premier Perspective Database was used to identify inpatient CEA and CAS procedures performed from January 2006 to March 2013. Patients were subclassified by age (<70/{\^a}‰¥70 years) and presentation (symptomatic/asymptomatic). CEA and CAS volumes were compared before and after the publication of CREST (July 2010) using an interrupted time series model. Results A total of 121,157 CEA and 18,503 CAS procedures performed at 445 medical centers were identified. There was no significant change observed in the overall number of CEA procedures performed after CREST publication relative to the pre-existing trend (P =.08); however, there was a significant increase in the overall number of CAS procedures performed (delta of 40 cases, P =.0179) in patients aged younger than 70 years (delta of 24 cases, P =.0008), 70 years or older (delta of 25 cases, P =.0047), and asymptomatic patients (delta of 39 cases, P =.0159). The overall percentage of CEA procedures performed in relation to all revascularization procedures was significantly lower after CREST publication overall (delta, -1.5{\%}; P =.041) for patients aged younger than 70 years (delta, -2.4{\%}; P <.0001) and asymptomatic patients (delta, -1.5{\%}; P =.035). Conclusions In this large sample of US hospitals, performance of CAS significantly increased after the publication of the CREST study.",
keywords = "carotid artery stenting, carotid endarterectomy, Carotid stenosis, utilization",
author = "McDonald, {Jennifer S} and Robert McDonald and Jiaquan Fan and Giuseppe Lanzino and Kallmes, {David F} and Cloft, {Harry J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.02.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1390--1396",
journal = "Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases",
issn = "1052-3057",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of CREST findings on carotid revascularization practice in the United States

AU - McDonald, Jennifer S

AU - McDonald, Robert

AU - Fan, Jiaquan

AU - Lanzino, Giuseppe

AU - Kallmes, David F

AU - Cloft, Harry J.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Background We sought to measure the impact of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) findings on clinical practice by studying trends in carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) utilization before and after publication of CREST in a large US multihospital database. Methods The Premier Perspective Database was used to identify inpatient CEA and CAS procedures performed from January 2006 to March 2013. Patients were subclassified by age (<70/≥70 years) and presentation (symptomatic/asymptomatic). CEA and CAS volumes were compared before and after the publication of CREST (July 2010) using an interrupted time series model. Results A total of 121,157 CEA and 18,503 CAS procedures performed at 445 medical centers were identified. There was no significant change observed in the overall number of CEA procedures performed after CREST publication relative to the pre-existing trend (P =.08); however, there was a significant increase in the overall number of CAS procedures performed (delta of 40 cases, P =.0179) in patients aged younger than 70 years (delta of 24 cases, P =.0008), 70 years or older (delta of 25 cases, P =.0047), and asymptomatic patients (delta of 39 cases, P =.0159). The overall percentage of CEA procedures performed in relation to all revascularization procedures was significantly lower after CREST publication overall (delta, -1.5%; P =.041) for patients aged younger than 70 years (delta, -2.4%; P <.0001) and asymptomatic patients (delta, -1.5%; P =.035). Conclusions In this large sample of US hospitals, performance of CAS significantly increased after the publication of the CREST study.

AB - Background We sought to measure the impact of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) findings on clinical practice by studying trends in carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) utilization before and after publication of CREST in a large US multihospital database. Methods The Premier Perspective Database was used to identify inpatient CEA and CAS procedures performed from January 2006 to March 2013. Patients were subclassified by age (<70/≥70 years) and presentation (symptomatic/asymptomatic). CEA and CAS volumes were compared before and after the publication of CREST (July 2010) using an interrupted time series model. Results A total of 121,157 CEA and 18,503 CAS procedures performed at 445 medical centers were identified. There was no significant change observed in the overall number of CEA procedures performed after CREST publication relative to the pre-existing trend (P =.08); however, there was a significant increase in the overall number of CAS procedures performed (delta of 40 cases, P =.0179) in patients aged younger than 70 years (delta of 24 cases, P =.0008), 70 years or older (delta of 25 cases, P =.0047), and asymptomatic patients (delta of 39 cases, P =.0159). The overall percentage of CEA procedures performed in relation to all revascularization procedures was significantly lower after CREST publication overall (delta, -1.5%; P =.041) for patients aged younger than 70 years (delta, -2.4%; P <.0001) and asymptomatic patients (delta, -1.5%; P =.035). Conclusions In this large sample of US hospitals, performance of CAS significantly increased after the publication of the CREST study.

KW - carotid artery stenting

KW - carotid endarterectomy

KW - Carotid stenosis

KW - utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930181121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930181121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.02.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.02.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 25840953

AN - SCOPUS:84930181121

VL - 24

SP - 1390

EP - 1396

JO - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

JF - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

SN - 1052-3057

IS - 6

ER -