Does cervical manipulative therapy cause vertebral artery dissection and stroke?

Madeline L. Miley, Kay E. Wellik, Dean Marko Wingerchuk, Bart M Demaerschalk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Does cervical manipulative therapy (CMT) cause vertebral arterial dissection (VAD) and subsequent ischemic stroke? What is the best estimate of the incidence of CMT associated with VAD and ischemic stroke? METHODS: The questions were addressed with a structured evidence-based clinical neurologic practice review. Participants included neuroscience students, consultant neurologists, clinical epidemiologists, medical librarians, and clinical content experts. A critically appraised topic format was employed, starting with a clinical scenario and structured question. The participant group devised search strategies, located and compiled the best evidence, performed critical appraisals, synthesized the results, summarized the evidence, provided commentary, and declared bottom-line conclusions. RESULTS: The search yielded 169 citations, of which 55 were deemed most relevant. From this return, we selected 26 publications of the highest evidence available: 3 case-control studies, 8 prospective and retrospective case series studies, 4 illustrative case reports, 1 survey, 1 systematic review of observational research, 5 reviews, and 4 opinion and expert commentary pieces. Five of the applicable 7 criteria for causation were satisfactorily met and supported weak to moderate strength of evidence for causation between CMT and VAD and associated stroke, especially in young adults. Young vertebrobasilar artery territory stroke patients were 5 times more likely than controls to have had CMT within 1 week of the event date (OR 5.03, 95% CI, 1.32-43.87). No significant associations were found for those ≥45 years of age. The best available estimate of incidence is approximately 1.3 cases of VAD or occlusion attributable to CMT for every 100,000 persons <45 years of age receiving CMT within 1 week of manipulative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Weak to moderately strong evidence exists to support causation between CMT and VAD and associated stroke. Ultimately, the acceptable level of risk associated with a therapeutic intervention like CMT must be balanced against evidence of therapeutic efficacy. Further research, employing prospective cohort study designs, is indicated to uncover both the benefits and the harms associated with CMT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-73
Number of pages8
JournalNeurologist
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Vertebral Artery Dissection
Musculoskeletal Manipulations
Stroke
Dissection
Causality
Librarians
Incidence
Expert Testimony
Neurosciences
Consultants
Research
Nervous System
Publications
Case-Control Studies
Young Adult
Cohort Studies
Arteries

Keywords

  • Causality
  • Cerebrovascular disorders
  • Chiropractic manipulation
  • Critically appraised topic
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Incidence
  • Spinal manipulation
  • Vertebral artery dissection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Does cervical manipulative therapy cause vertebral artery dissection and stroke? / Miley, Madeline L.; Wellik, Kay E.; Wingerchuk, Dean Marko; Demaerschalk, Bart M.

In: Neurologist, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 66-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c43a397dd6943e78010e974e660d548,
title = "Does cervical manipulative therapy cause vertebral artery dissection and stroke?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Does cervical manipulative therapy (CMT) cause vertebral arterial dissection (VAD) and subsequent ischemic stroke? What is the best estimate of the incidence of CMT associated with VAD and ischemic stroke? METHODS: The questions were addressed with a structured evidence-based clinical neurologic practice review. Participants included neuroscience students, consultant neurologists, clinical epidemiologists, medical librarians, and clinical content experts. A critically appraised topic format was employed, starting with a clinical scenario and structured question. The participant group devised search strategies, located and compiled the best evidence, performed critical appraisals, synthesized the results, summarized the evidence, provided commentary, and declared bottom-line conclusions. RESULTS: The search yielded 169 citations, of which 55 were deemed most relevant. From this return, we selected 26 publications of the highest evidence available: 3 case-control studies, 8 prospective and retrospective case series studies, 4 illustrative case reports, 1 survey, 1 systematic review of observational research, 5 reviews, and 4 opinion and expert commentary pieces. Five of the applicable 7 criteria for causation were satisfactorily met and supported weak to moderate strength of evidence for causation between CMT and VAD and associated stroke, especially in young adults. Young vertebrobasilar artery territory stroke patients were 5 times more likely than controls to have had CMT within 1 week of the event date (OR 5.03, 95{\%} CI, 1.32-43.87). No significant associations were found for those ≥45 years of age. The best available estimate of incidence is approximately 1.3 cases of VAD or occlusion attributable to CMT for every 100,000 persons <45 years of age receiving CMT within 1 week of manipulative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Weak to moderately strong evidence exists to support causation between CMT and VAD and associated stroke. Ultimately, the acceptable level of risk associated with a therapeutic intervention like CMT must be balanced against evidence of therapeutic efficacy. Further research, employing prospective cohort study designs, is indicated to uncover both the benefits and the harms associated with CMT.",
keywords = "Causality, Cerebrovascular disorders, Chiropractic manipulation, Critically appraised topic, Evidence-based medicine, Incidence, Spinal manipulation, Vertebral artery dissection",
author = "Miley, {Madeline L.} and Wellik, {Kay E.} and Wingerchuk, {Dean Marko} and Demaerschalk, {Bart M}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/NRL.0b013e318164e53d",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "66--73",
journal = "Neurologist",
issn = "1074-7931",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does cervical manipulative therapy cause vertebral artery dissection and stroke?

AU - Miley, Madeline L.

AU - Wellik, Kay E.

AU - Wingerchuk, Dean Marko

AU - Demaerschalk, Bart M

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Does cervical manipulative therapy (CMT) cause vertebral arterial dissection (VAD) and subsequent ischemic stroke? What is the best estimate of the incidence of CMT associated with VAD and ischemic stroke? METHODS: The questions were addressed with a structured evidence-based clinical neurologic practice review. Participants included neuroscience students, consultant neurologists, clinical epidemiologists, medical librarians, and clinical content experts. A critically appraised topic format was employed, starting with a clinical scenario and structured question. The participant group devised search strategies, located and compiled the best evidence, performed critical appraisals, synthesized the results, summarized the evidence, provided commentary, and declared bottom-line conclusions. RESULTS: The search yielded 169 citations, of which 55 were deemed most relevant. From this return, we selected 26 publications of the highest evidence available: 3 case-control studies, 8 prospective and retrospective case series studies, 4 illustrative case reports, 1 survey, 1 systematic review of observational research, 5 reviews, and 4 opinion and expert commentary pieces. Five of the applicable 7 criteria for causation were satisfactorily met and supported weak to moderate strength of evidence for causation between CMT and VAD and associated stroke, especially in young adults. Young vertebrobasilar artery territory stroke patients were 5 times more likely than controls to have had CMT within 1 week of the event date (OR 5.03, 95% CI, 1.32-43.87). No significant associations were found for those ≥45 years of age. The best available estimate of incidence is approximately 1.3 cases of VAD or occlusion attributable to CMT for every 100,000 persons <45 years of age receiving CMT within 1 week of manipulative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Weak to moderately strong evidence exists to support causation between CMT and VAD and associated stroke. Ultimately, the acceptable level of risk associated with a therapeutic intervention like CMT must be balanced against evidence of therapeutic efficacy. Further research, employing prospective cohort study designs, is indicated to uncover both the benefits and the harms associated with CMT.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Does cervical manipulative therapy (CMT) cause vertebral arterial dissection (VAD) and subsequent ischemic stroke? What is the best estimate of the incidence of CMT associated with VAD and ischemic stroke? METHODS: The questions were addressed with a structured evidence-based clinical neurologic practice review. Participants included neuroscience students, consultant neurologists, clinical epidemiologists, medical librarians, and clinical content experts. A critically appraised topic format was employed, starting with a clinical scenario and structured question. The participant group devised search strategies, located and compiled the best evidence, performed critical appraisals, synthesized the results, summarized the evidence, provided commentary, and declared bottom-line conclusions. RESULTS: The search yielded 169 citations, of which 55 were deemed most relevant. From this return, we selected 26 publications of the highest evidence available: 3 case-control studies, 8 prospective and retrospective case series studies, 4 illustrative case reports, 1 survey, 1 systematic review of observational research, 5 reviews, and 4 opinion and expert commentary pieces. Five of the applicable 7 criteria for causation were satisfactorily met and supported weak to moderate strength of evidence for causation between CMT and VAD and associated stroke, especially in young adults. Young vertebrobasilar artery territory stroke patients were 5 times more likely than controls to have had CMT within 1 week of the event date (OR 5.03, 95% CI, 1.32-43.87). No significant associations were found for those ≥45 years of age. The best available estimate of incidence is approximately 1.3 cases of VAD or occlusion attributable to CMT for every 100,000 persons <45 years of age receiving CMT within 1 week of manipulative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Weak to moderately strong evidence exists to support causation between CMT and VAD and associated stroke. Ultimately, the acceptable level of risk associated with a therapeutic intervention like CMT must be balanced against evidence of therapeutic efficacy. Further research, employing prospective cohort study designs, is indicated to uncover both the benefits and the harms associated with CMT.

KW - Causality

KW - Cerebrovascular disorders

KW - Chiropractic manipulation

KW - Critically appraised topic

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Incidence

KW - Spinal manipulation

KW - Vertebral artery dissection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349036001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349036001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/NRL.0b013e318164e53d

DO - 10.1097/NRL.0b013e318164e53d

M3 - Article

C2 - 18195663

AN - SCOPUS:38349036001

VL - 14

SP - 66

EP - 73

JO - Neurologist

JF - Neurologist

SN - 1074-7931

IS - 1

ER -