TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences in left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes measured at rest and poststress by gated sestamibi SPECT
AU - Ramakrishna, Gautam
AU - Miller, Todd D.
AU - Hodge, David O.
AU - O'Connor, Michael K.
AU - Gibbons, Raymond J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Drs Ramakrishna, Hodge, and O’Connor have indicated that they have no financial conflicts of interest. Dr Miller has received research grants from Medtronic, King Pharm, Wyeth-Ayerst, Radiant Medical, Alsius Corporation, TherOx, Innercool Therapies, Boston Scientific, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr Gibbons has received research grants from King Pharm, Radiant Medical, TherOx, Boston Scientific, Boehringer Ingelheim, Spectranetics, KAI Pharmaceuticals, and TargeGen, and serves as a consultant for Cardiovascular Clinical Studies (WOMEN study), Consumers Union, and TIMI 37A.
PY - 2006/9
Y1 - 2006/9
N2 - Background: Some studies suggested that the poststress left ventricle ejection fraction (LV EF) is lower than rest LV EF in patients with stress-induced ischemia. Methods and Results: By using a 2-day protocol and 30 mCi Tc-99m sestamibi, LV EF, end-systolic volume (ESV), and end-diastolic volume (EDV) were measured with gated SPECT. Of 99 eligible patients, 91 had technically adequate studies. Poststress LV EF minus rest LV EF was defined as ΔLV EF. ΔEDV and ΔESV were similarly defined. Rest and poststress LV EF (r = 0.89), EDV (r = 0.78), and ESV (r = 0.93) were highly correlated (P <.001). Rest LV EF, EDV, and ESV were not significantly different between patients with and without stress-induced ischemia. ΔLV EF was significantly lower in patients with stress-induced ischemia (-3.5% ± 4.5% vs -1.1% ± 4.7%, P = .02). Mean LV EF poststress in ischemic patients was 55.0% ± 10.5% vs 61.2% ± 10.0% in nonischemic patients (P = .008). However, only 1 patient (3%) with ischemia had ΔLV EF that exceeded the 95% confidence limit of ΔLV EF for normal patients. Ischemia was significantly associated with increased ΔEDV and ΔESV (P <.01). Conclusions: Stress-induced ischemia is associated with poststress reduction in LV EF and increased poststress EDV and ESV. However, the effect of ischemia on the difference between poststress and rest EF measurements is modest and rarely exceeds the confidence limits in normal patients undergoing 2-day protocols. In most patients, poststress LV EF is an accurate reflection of rest LV EF.
AB - Background: Some studies suggested that the poststress left ventricle ejection fraction (LV EF) is lower than rest LV EF in patients with stress-induced ischemia. Methods and Results: By using a 2-day protocol and 30 mCi Tc-99m sestamibi, LV EF, end-systolic volume (ESV), and end-diastolic volume (EDV) were measured with gated SPECT. Of 99 eligible patients, 91 had technically adequate studies. Poststress LV EF minus rest LV EF was defined as ΔLV EF. ΔEDV and ΔESV were similarly defined. Rest and poststress LV EF (r = 0.89), EDV (r = 0.78), and ESV (r = 0.93) were highly correlated (P <.001). Rest LV EF, EDV, and ESV were not significantly different between patients with and without stress-induced ischemia. ΔLV EF was significantly lower in patients with stress-induced ischemia (-3.5% ± 4.5% vs -1.1% ± 4.7%, P = .02). Mean LV EF poststress in ischemic patients was 55.0% ± 10.5% vs 61.2% ± 10.0% in nonischemic patients (P = .008). However, only 1 patient (3%) with ischemia had ΔLV EF that exceeded the 95% confidence limit of ΔLV EF for normal patients. Ischemia was significantly associated with increased ΔEDV and ΔESV (P <.01). Conclusions: Stress-induced ischemia is associated with poststress reduction in LV EF and increased poststress EDV and ESV. However, the effect of ischemia on the difference between poststress and rest EF measurements is modest and rarely exceeds the confidence limits in normal patients undergoing 2-day protocols. In most patients, poststress LV EF is an accurate reflection of rest LV EF.
KW - Quantitative gated SPECT
KW - ischemia
KW - left ventricular ejection fraction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747850478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747850478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.08.002
DO - 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.08.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 16945747
AN - SCOPUS:33747850478
SN - 1071-3581
VL - 13
SP - 668
EP - 674
JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
IS - 5
ER -