Designing a randomized clinical trial to evaluate personalized medicine: A new approach based on risk prediction

Stuart G. Baker, Daniel J. Sargent

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

We define personalized medicine as the administration of treatment to only persons thought most likely to benefit, typically those at high risk for mortality or another detrimental outcome. To evaluate personalized medicine, we propose a new design for a randomized trial that makes efficient use of high-throughput data (such as gene expression microarrays) and clinical data (such as tumor stage) collected at baseline from all participants. Under this design for a randomized trial involving experimental and control arms with a survival outcome, investigators first estimate the risk of mortality in the control arm based on the high-throughput and clinical data. Then investigators use data from both randomization arms to estimate both the effect of treatment among all participants and among participants in the highest prespecified category of risk. This design requires only an 18.1% increase in sample size compared with a standard randomized trial. A trial based on this design that has a 90% power to detect a realistic increase in survival from 70% to 80% among all participants, would also have a 90% power to detect an increase in survival from 50% to 73% in the highest quintile of risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1756-1759
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume102
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Designing a randomized clinical trial to evaluate personalized medicine: A new approach based on risk prediction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this