TY - JOUR
T1 - Design and α-testing of an electronic rounding tool (CERTAINp) to improve process of care in pediatric intensive care unit
AU - Hulyalkar, Manasi
AU - Gleich, Stephen J.
AU - Kashyap, Rahul
AU - Barwise, Amelia
AU - Kaur, Harsheen
AU - Dong, Yue
AU - Fan, Lei
AU - Murthy, Srinivas
AU - Arteaga, Grace M.
AU - Tripathi, Sandeep
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments We appreciate Professor Ognjen Gajic’s advice and mentorship for this study. His leadership in adult CERTAIN project has inspired this current study. This publication was made possible by CTSA Grant No. UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Increasing process complexity in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) can lead to information overload resulting in missing pertinent information and potential errors during morning rounds. An efficient model using a novel electronic rounding tool was designed as part of a broader critical care decision support system-checklist for early recognition and treatment of acute illness and injury in pediatrics (CERTAINp). We aimed to evaluate its impact on improving the process of care during rounding. Prospective pre- and post-interventional data included: team performance baseline assessment, patient safety discussion, guideline adherence, rounding time, and a survey of Residents’ and Nurses’ perception using a Likert scale. Attending physicians were blinded to the components of the assessment. A total of 113 pre-intervention and 114 post-intervention roundings were recorded by direct observation. Pre-intervention (108) and post-intervention staff surveys (80) were obtained. Adherence to standard of care guidelines improved to >97 % in all data points, with maximum increase seen in discussions of ulcer prophylaxis, bowel protocol, DVT prophylaxis, skin care, glucose control and head of bed elevation (2–28 % pre-vs. 100 % for all post-intervention, p < 0.01). Significant improvement was noticed in spontaneous breathing trials, sedation breaks and need for devices (45–57 % pre- vs. 100 % for all post-intervention, p < 0.01). Rounding time (mean ± SD) increased by 2 min/patient (8.0 ± 5.8 min pre-intervention vs. 9.9 ± 5.7 min post-intervention, p = 0.002). Staff reported improved perception of all aspects of rounding. Utilization of the CERTAINp rounding tool led to perfect compliance to the discussion of best practice guidelines; had minimal impact on rounding time and improved PICU staff satisfaction.
AB - Increasing process complexity in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) can lead to information overload resulting in missing pertinent information and potential errors during morning rounds. An efficient model using a novel electronic rounding tool was designed as part of a broader critical care decision support system-checklist for early recognition and treatment of acute illness and injury in pediatrics (CERTAINp). We aimed to evaluate its impact on improving the process of care during rounding. Prospective pre- and post-interventional data included: team performance baseline assessment, patient safety discussion, guideline adherence, rounding time, and a survey of Residents’ and Nurses’ perception using a Likert scale. Attending physicians were blinded to the components of the assessment. A total of 113 pre-intervention and 114 post-intervention roundings were recorded by direct observation. Pre-intervention (108) and post-intervention staff surveys (80) were obtained. Adherence to standard of care guidelines improved to >97 % in all data points, with maximum increase seen in discussions of ulcer prophylaxis, bowel protocol, DVT prophylaxis, skin care, glucose control and head of bed elevation (2–28 % pre-vs. 100 % for all post-intervention, p < 0.01). Significant improvement was noticed in spontaneous breathing trials, sedation breaks and need for devices (45–57 % pre- vs. 100 % for all post-intervention, p < 0.01). Rounding time (mean ± SD) increased by 2 min/patient (8.0 ± 5.8 min pre-intervention vs. 9.9 ± 5.7 min post-intervention, p = 0.002). Staff reported improved perception of all aspects of rounding. Utilization of the CERTAINp rounding tool led to perfect compliance to the discussion of best practice guidelines; had minimal impact on rounding time and improved PICU staff satisfaction.
KW - Electronic checklist
KW - ICU rounds
KW - Intensive care unit (ICU)
KW - Pediatrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991721592&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991721592&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10877-016-9946-1
DO - 10.1007/s10877-016-9946-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 27757740
AN - SCOPUS:84991721592
SN - 1387-1307
VL - 31
SP - 1313
EP - 1320
JO - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
JF - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
IS - 6
ER -