Depression remission after six months of collaborative care management

Role of initial severity of depression in outcome

Kurt B. Angstman, Pamela Pietruszewski, Norman H. Rasmussen, John M. Wilkinson, David J Katzelnick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: The impact of initial severity of depression on the rate of remission has not been well studied. The hypothesis for this study was that increased depression severity would have an inverse relationship on clinical remission at six months while in collaborative care management. Participants: The study cohort was 1128 primary care patients from a south-eastern Minnesota practice and was a longitudinal retrospective chart review analysis. Results: Clinical remission at six months was less likely in the severe depression group at 29.6% compared with 36.9% in the moderately severe group and 45.6% in the moderate depression group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of a subgroup demonstrated that increased initial anxiety symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 0.9645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9345-0.9954, P = 0.0248) and an abnormal screening for bipolar disorder (OR 0.4856, 95% CI 0.2659-0.8868, P = 0.0187) predicted not achieving remission at six months. A patient with severe depression was significantly less likely to achieve remission at six months (OR 0.6040, 95% CI 0.3803-0.9592, P = 0.0327) compared with moderate depression, but not moderately severe depression (P = 0.2324). There was no statistical difference in the adjusted means of the PHQ-9 score for those patients who were in remission at sixmonths. However, in the unremitted patients, the six-month PHQ-9 score was significantly increased by initial depression severity when controlling for all other variables. Conclusion: Multivariate analysis in our study demonstrated that patients with severe depression have a decreased OR for remission at six months compared with moderate depression. Also, there was a significant increase in the six-month PHQ-9 score for those unremitted patients in the severe vs. moderate depression groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-106
Number of pages8
JournalMental Health in Family Medicine
Volume9
Issue number2
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Depression
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Multivariate Analysis
Bipolar Disorder
Primary Health Care
Cohort Studies
Anxiety

Keywords

  • Collaborative care management
  • Depression
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Depression remission after six months of collaborative care management : Role of initial severity of depression in outcome. / Angstman, Kurt B.; Pietruszewski, Pamela; Rasmussen, Norman H.; Wilkinson, John M.; Katzelnick, David J.

In: Mental Health in Family Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 2, 11.2012, p. 99-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Angstman, Kurt B. ; Pietruszewski, Pamela ; Rasmussen, Norman H. ; Wilkinson, John M. ; Katzelnick, David J. / Depression remission after six months of collaborative care management : Role of initial severity of depression in outcome. In: Mental Health in Family Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 99-106.
@article{d43dd0c496964d30be9c2f379beb7b6c,
title = "Depression remission after six months of collaborative care management: Role of initial severity of depression in outcome",
abstract = "Aim: The impact of initial severity of depression on the rate of remission has not been well studied. The hypothesis for this study was that increased depression severity would have an inverse relationship on clinical remission at six months while in collaborative care management. Participants: The study cohort was 1128 primary care patients from a south-eastern Minnesota practice and was a longitudinal retrospective chart review analysis. Results: Clinical remission at six months was less likely in the severe depression group at 29.6{\%} compared with 36.9{\%} in the moderately severe group and 45.6{\%} in the moderate depression group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of a subgroup demonstrated that increased initial anxiety symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 0.9645, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.9345-0.9954, P = 0.0248) and an abnormal screening for bipolar disorder (OR 0.4856, 95{\%} CI 0.2659-0.8868, P = 0.0187) predicted not achieving remission at six months. A patient with severe depression was significantly less likely to achieve remission at six months (OR 0.6040, 95{\%} CI 0.3803-0.9592, P = 0.0327) compared with moderate depression, but not moderately severe depression (P = 0.2324). There was no statistical difference in the adjusted means of the PHQ-9 score for those patients who were in remission at sixmonths. However, in the unremitted patients, the six-month PHQ-9 score was significantly increased by initial depression severity when controlling for all other variables. Conclusion: Multivariate analysis in our study demonstrated that patients with severe depression have a decreased OR for remission at six months compared with moderate depression. Also, there was a significant increase in the six-month PHQ-9 score for those unremitted patients in the severe vs. moderate depression groups.",
keywords = "Collaborative care management, Depression, Primary care",
author = "Angstman, {Kurt B.} and Pamela Pietruszewski and Rasmussen, {Norman H.} and Wilkinson, {John M.} and Katzelnick, {David J}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "99--106",
journal = "Mental Health in Family Medicine",
issn = "1756-834X",
publisher = "Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Depression remission after six months of collaborative care management

T2 - Role of initial severity of depression in outcome

AU - Angstman, Kurt B.

AU - Pietruszewski, Pamela

AU - Rasmussen, Norman H.

AU - Wilkinson, John M.

AU - Katzelnick, David J

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Aim: The impact of initial severity of depression on the rate of remission has not been well studied. The hypothesis for this study was that increased depression severity would have an inverse relationship on clinical remission at six months while in collaborative care management. Participants: The study cohort was 1128 primary care patients from a south-eastern Minnesota practice and was a longitudinal retrospective chart review analysis. Results: Clinical remission at six months was less likely in the severe depression group at 29.6% compared with 36.9% in the moderately severe group and 45.6% in the moderate depression group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of a subgroup demonstrated that increased initial anxiety symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 0.9645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9345-0.9954, P = 0.0248) and an abnormal screening for bipolar disorder (OR 0.4856, 95% CI 0.2659-0.8868, P = 0.0187) predicted not achieving remission at six months. A patient with severe depression was significantly less likely to achieve remission at six months (OR 0.6040, 95% CI 0.3803-0.9592, P = 0.0327) compared with moderate depression, but not moderately severe depression (P = 0.2324). There was no statistical difference in the adjusted means of the PHQ-9 score for those patients who were in remission at sixmonths. However, in the unremitted patients, the six-month PHQ-9 score was significantly increased by initial depression severity when controlling for all other variables. Conclusion: Multivariate analysis in our study demonstrated that patients with severe depression have a decreased OR for remission at six months compared with moderate depression. Also, there was a significant increase in the six-month PHQ-9 score for those unremitted patients in the severe vs. moderate depression groups.

AB - Aim: The impact of initial severity of depression on the rate of remission has not been well studied. The hypothesis for this study was that increased depression severity would have an inverse relationship on clinical remission at six months while in collaborative care management. Participants: The study cohort was 1128 primary care patients from a south-eastern Minnesota practice and was a longitudinal retrospective chart review analysis. Results: Clinical remission at six months was less likely in the severe depression group at 29.6% compared with 36.9% in the moderately severe group and 45.6% in the moderate depression group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of a subgroup demonstrated that increased initial anxiety symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 0.9645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9345-0.9954, P = 0.0248) and an abnormal screening for bipolar disorder (OR 0.4856, 95% CI 0.2659-0.8868, P = 0.0187) predicted not achieving remission at six months. A patient with severe depression was significantly less likely to achieve remission at six months (OR 0.6040, 95% CI 0.3803-0.9592, P = 0.0327) compared with moderate depression, but not moderately severe depression (P = 0.2324). There was no statistical difference in the adjusted means of the PHQ-9 score for those patients who were in remission at sixmonths. However, in the unremitted patients, the six-month PHQ-9 score was significantly increased by initial depression severity when controlling for all other variables. Conclusion: Multivariate analysis in our study demonstrated that patients with severe depression have a decreased OR for remission at six months compared with moderate depression. Also, there was a significant increase in the six-month PHQ-9 score for those unremitted patients in the severe vs. moderate depression groups.

KW - Collaborative care management

KW - Depression

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870400567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870400567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 99

EP - 106

JO - Mental Health in Family Medicine

JF - Mental Health in Family Medicine

SN - 1756-834X

IS - 2

ER -