Cross-sectional validation of inertial measurement units for estimating trunk flexion kinematics during treadmill disturbances

Emily J. Miller, Kenton R Kaufman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Postural perturbation training has been shown to reduce falls. The key outcome measures are trunk flexion kinematics, at recovery step. Motion capture is typically used, but requires space and trained staff. Small, inexpensive, portable inertial measurement units (IMU) are preferred for routine clinical care. IMUs have been validated for trunk motion during walking and running on a treadmill, however treadmill fall prevention training generates higher accelerations. The purpose of this study was to validate the IMU estimate of trunk kinematics against motion capture during treadmill disturbances. Ten healthy young adults had an IMU with a retro-reflective marker triad placed on their sternum to estimate trunk kinematics. Disturbances, increasing in magnitude, were delivered until the harness supported at least 50% of the subject's weight. Equivalence testing (α = 0.05) demonstrated the trunk angle (TA) and angular velocity (TAV) measured by the IMU and motion capture were equivalent. The 95% Confidence Intervals (TA: [-1, 1], TAV: [0, 17]) were within the equivalence interval (TA: [−2, 2], TAV: [−20, 20]) and the p-Values (TA: 0.005, TAV: 0.011) were less than alpha. This data confirms that IMUs provide a valid method for measuring trunk kinematics during treadmill perturbation training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedical Engineering and Physics
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Exercise equipment
Units of measurement
Angular velocity
Biomechanical Phenomena
Kinematics
Sternum
Running
Walking
Young Adult
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Confidence Intervals
Weights and Measures
Recovery
Testing

Keywords

  • Falls
  • IMU
  • Motion Capture
  • Treadmill disturbance
  • Trunk flexion kinematics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

@article{4b3bce131b204088a7b2b6fab6b1c5fc,
title = "Cross-sectional validation of inertial measurement units for estimating trunk flexion kinematics during treadmill disturbances",
abstract = "Postural perturbation training has been shown to reduce falls. The key outcome measures are trunk flexion kinematics, at recovery step. Motion capture is typically used, but requires space and trained staff. Small, inexpensive, portable inertial measurement units (IMU) are preferred for routine clinical care. IMUs have been validated for trunk motion during walking and running on a treadmill, however treadmill fall prevention training generates higher accelerations. The purpose of this study was to validate the IMU estimate of trunk kinematics against motion capture during treadmill disturbances. Ten healthy young adults had an IMU with a retro-reflective marker triad placed on their sternum to estimate trunk kinematics. Disturbances, increasing in magnitude, were delivered until the harness supported at least 50{\%} of the subject's weight. Equivalence testing (α = 0.05) demonstrated the trunk angle (TA) and angular velocity (TAV) measured by the IMU and motion capture were equivalent. The 95{\%} Confidence Intervals (TA: [-1, 1], TAV: [0, 17]) were within the equivalence interval (TA: [−2, 2], TAV: [−20, 20]) and the p-Values (TA: 0.005, TAV: 0.011) were less than alpha. This data confirms that IMUs provide a valid method for measuring trunk kinematics during treadmill perturbation training.",
keywords = "Falls, IMU, Motion Capture, Treadmill disturbance, Trunk flexion kinematics",
author = "Miller, {Emily J.} and Kaufman, {Kenton R}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.06.016",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Medical Engineering and Physics",
issn = "1350-4533",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-sectional validation of inertial measurement units for estimating trunk flexion kinematics during treadmill disturbances

AU - Miller, Emily J.

AU - Kaufman, Kenton R

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Postural perturbation training has been shown to reduce falls. The key outcome measures are trunk flexion kinematics, at recovery step. Motion capture is typically used, but requires space and trained staff. Small, inexpensive, portable inertial measurement units (IMU) are preferred for routine clinical care. IMUs have been validated for trunk motion during walking and running on a treadmill, however treadmill fall prevention training generates higher accelerations. The purpose of this study was to validate the IMU estimate of trunk kinematics against motion capture during treadmill disturbances. Ten healthy young adults had an IMU with a retro-reflective marker triad placed on their sternum to estimate trunk kinematics. Disturbances, increasing in magnitude, were delivered until the harness supported at least 50% of the subject's weight. Equivalence testing (α = 0.05) demonstrated the trunk angle (TA) and angular velocity (TAV) measured by the IMU and motion capture were equivalent. The 95% Confidence Intervals (TA: [-1, 1], TAV: [0, 17]) were within the equivalence interval (TA: [−2, 2], TAV: [−20, 20]) and the p-Values (TA: 0.005, TAV: 0.011) were less than alpha. This data confirms that IMUs provide a valid method for measuring trunk kinematics during treadmill perturbation training.

AB - Postural perturbation training has been shown to reduce falls. The key outcome measures are trunk flexion kinematics, at recovery step. Motion capture is typically used, but requires space and trained staff. Small, inexpensive, portable inertial measurement units (IMU) are preferred for routine clinical care. IMUs have been validated for trunk motion during walking and running on a treadmill, however treadmill fall prevention training generates higher accelerations. The purpose of this study was to validate the IMU estimate of trunk kinematics against motion capture during treadmill disturbances. Ten healthy young adults had an IMU with a retro-reflective marker triad placed on their sternum to estimate trunk kinematics. Disturbances, increasing in magnitude, were delivered until the harness supported at least 50% of the subject's weight. Equivalence testing (α = 0.05) demonstrated the trunk angle (TA) and angular velocity (TAV) measured by the IMU and motion capture were equivalent. The 95% Confidence Intervals (TA: [-1, 1], TAV: [0, 17]) were within the equivalence interval (TA: [−2, 2], TAV: [−20, 20]) and the p-Values (TA: 0.005, TAV: 0.011) were less than alpha. This data confirms that IMUs provide a valid method for measuring trunk kinematics during treadmill perturbation training.

KW - Falls

KW - IMU

KW - Motion Capture

KW - Treadmill disturbance

KW - Trunk flexion kinematics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067965381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067965381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.06.016

DO - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.06.016

M3 - Article

JO - Medical Engineering and Physics

JF - Medical Engineering and Physics

SN - 1350-4533

ER -