Critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism

Francis M. Fesmire, Michael D. Brown, James A. Espinosa, Richard D. Shih, Scott M. Silvers, Stephen J. Wolf, Wyatt W. Decker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians is the revision of a 2003 clinical policy on the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).1 A writing subcommittee reviewed the literature to derive evidence-based recommendations to help clinicians answer the following critical questions: (1) Do objective criteria provide improved risk stratification over gestalt clinical assessment in the evaluation of patients with possible PE? (2) What is the utility of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) in the evaluation of patients with suspected PE? (3)What is the role of quantitative D-dimer testing in the exclusion of PE? (4) What is the role of computed tomography pulmonary angiogram of the chest as the sole diagnostic test in the exclusion of PE? (5) What is the role of venous imaging in the evaluation of patients with suspected PE? (6) What are the indications for thrombolytic therapy in patients with PE? Evidence was graded and recommendations were given based on the strength of the available data in the medical literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume57
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Embolism
Hospital Emergency Service
Thrombolytic Therapy
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Angiography
Thorax
Tomography
Lung

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism. / Fesmire, Francis M.; Brown, Michael D.; Espinosa, James A.; Shih, Richard D.; Silvers, Scott M.; Wolf, Stephen J.; Decker, Wyatt W.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 57, No. 6, 06.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fesmire, Francis M. ; Brown, Michael D. ; Espinosa, James A. ; Shih, Richard D. ; Silvers, Scott M. ; Wolf, Stephen J. ; Decker, Wyatt W. / Critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 57, No. 6.
@article{a6c5d5d8a8a5432096566f0b4658844b,
title = "Critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism",
abstract = "This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians is the revision of a 2003 clinical policy on the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).1 A writing subcommittee reviewed the literature to derive evidence-based recommendations to help clinicians answer the following critical questions: (1) Do objective criteria provide improved risk stratification over gestalt clinical assessment in the evaluation of patients with possible PE? (2) What is the utility of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) in the evaluation of patients with suspected PE? (3)What is the role of quantitative D-dimer testing in the exclusion of PE? (4) What is the role of computed tomography pulmonary angiogram of the chest as the sole diagnostic test in the exclusion of PE? (5) What is the role of venous imaging in the evaluation of patients with suspected PE? (6) What are the indications for thrombolytic therapy in patients with PE? Evidence was graded and recommendations were given based on the strength of the available data in the medical literature.",
author = "Fesmire, {Francis M.} and Brown, {Michael D.} and Espinosa, {James A.} and Shih, {Richard D.} and Silvers, {Scott M.} and Wolf, {Stephen J.} and Decker, {Wyatt W.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism

AU - Fesmire, Francis M.

AU - Brown, Michael D.

AU - Espinosa, James A.

AU - Shih, Richard D.

AU - Silvers, Scott M.

AU - Wolf, Stephen J.

AU - Decker, Wyatt W.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians is the revision of a 2003 clinical policy on the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).1 A writing subcommittee reviewed the literature to derive evidence-based recommendations to help clinicians answer the following critical questions: (1) Do objective criteria provide improved risk stratification over gestalt clinical assessment in the evaluation of patients with possible PE? (2) What is the utility of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) in the evaluation of patients with suspected PE? (3)What is the role of quantitative D-dimer testing in the exclusion of PE? (4) What is the role of computed tomography pulmonary angiogram of the chest as the sole diagnostic test in the exclusion of PE? (5) What is the role of venous imaging in the evaluation of patients with suspected PE? (6) What are the indications for thrombolytic therapy in patients with PE? Evidence was graded and recommendations were given based on the strength of the available data in the medical literature.

AB - This clinical policy from the American College of Emergency Physicians is the revision of a 2003 clinical policy on the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).1 A writing subcommittee reviewed the literature to derive evidence-based recommendations to help clinicians answer the following critical questions: (1) Do objective criteria provide improved risk stratification over gestalt clinical assessment in the evaluation of patients with possible PE? (2) What is the utility of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) in the evaluation of patients with suspected PE? (3)What is the role of quantitative D-dimer testing in the exclusion of PE? (4) What is the role of computed tomography pulmonary angiogram of the chest as the sole diagnostic test in the exclusion of PE? (5) What is the role of venous imaging in the evaluation of patients with suspected PE? (6) What are the indications for thrombolytic therapy in patients with PE? Evidence was graded and recommendations were given based on the strength of the available data in the medical literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957773103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957773103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.020

DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.020

M3 - Article

VL - 57

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 6

ER -