TY - JOUR
T1 - Correlation of geomagnetic activity with implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks and antitachycardia pacing
AU - Ebrille, Elisa
AU - Konecny, Tomas
AU - Konecny, Dana
AU - Spacek, Radim
AU - Jones, Paul
AU - Ambroz, Pavel
AU - Desimone, Christopher V.
AU - Powell, Brian D.
AU - Hayes, David L.
AU - Friedman, Paul A.
AU - Asirvatham, Samuel J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Grant Support : This study was supported, in part, by the Mayo Clinic Foundation, European Regional Development Fund Project FNUSA-ICRC CARDIO (No. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123 ), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences ( NCATS UL1 TR000135 ), and a Boston Scientific grant for electrophysiology fellows in training.
Funding Information:
Potential Competing Interests: Dr Jones receives a salary from Boston Scientific. Dr Powell is a consultant for Boston Scientific; is on the speaker’s bureau for Medtronic; and serves on the medical advisory board for Biotronik. Dr Hayes serves as a speaker at educational venues for Medtronic, St Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and Sorin Medical; serves on the research steering committee for St Jude Medical; and receives royalties from John Wiley & Sons. Dr Friedman is a consultant for Bard Electrophysiology, Biotronik, Leadexx, Sorin Medical, and Boston Scientific and receives research grants from Medtronic and Biotronik . Dr Asirvatham is a consultant for Abiomed, Atricure, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Spectranetics, St Jude Medical, Sanofi-Aventis, Wolters Kluwer, and Elsevier.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - Objective To investigate a potential relationship between implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies and daily geomagnetic activity (GMA) recorded in a large database. Patients and Methods The ALTITUDE database, derived from the Boston Scientific LATITUDE remote monitoring system, was retrospectively analyzed for the frequency of ICD therapies. Daily GMA was expressed as the planetary K-index and the integrated A-index and was graded as levels I (quiet), II (unsettled), III (active), and IV (storm). Results A daily mean ± SD of 59,468±11,397 patients were monitored between January 1, 2009, and May 15, 2012. The distribution of days according to GMA was as follows: level I, 924/1231 (75%); level II, 226/1231 (18%); level III, 60/1231 (5%); and level IV, 21/1231 (2%). The daily mean ± SD numbers of ICD shocks received per 1000 active patients in the database were 1.29±0.47, 1.17±0.46, 1.03±0.37, and 0.94±0.29 on level I, II, III, and IV days, respectively; the daily mean ± SD sums of shocks and antitachycardia pacing therapies were 9.29±2.86, 8.46±2.45, 7.92±1.80, and 7.83±2.28 on quiet, unsettled, active, and storm days, respectively. A significant inverse relationship between GMA and frequency of ICD therapies was identified, with the most pronounced difference between level I and level IV days (P<.001 for shocks; P=.008 for shocks + antitachycardia pacing). Conclusion In a large-scale cohort analysis, ICD therapies were delivered less frequently on days of higher GMA, confirming the previous pilot data and suggesting that higher GMA does not pose an increased risk of arrhythmias using ICD therapies as a surrogate marker. Further studies are needed to gain an in-depth understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
AB - Objective To investigate a potential relationship between implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies and daily geomagnetic activity (GMA) recorded in a large database. Patients and Methods The ALTITUDE database, derived from the Boston Scientific LATITUDE remote monitoring system, was retrospectively analyzed for the frequency of ICD therapies. Daily GMA was expressed as the planetary K-index and the integrated A-index and was graded as levels I (quiet), II (unsettled), III (active), and IV (storm). Results A daily mean ± SD of 59,468±11,397 patients were monitored between January 1, 2009, and May 15, 2012. The distribution of days according to GMA was as follows: level I, 924/1231 (75%); level II, 226/1231 (18%); level III, 60/1231 (5%); and level IV, 21/1231 (2%). The daily mean ± SD numbers of ICD shocks received per 1000 active patients in the database were 1.29±0.47, 1.17±0.46, 1.03±0.37, and 0.94±0.29 on level I, II, III, and IV days, respectively; the daily mean ± SD sums of shocks and antitachycardia pacing therapies were 9.29±2.86, 8.46±2.45, 7.92±1.80, and 7.83±2.28 on quiet, unsettled, active, and storm days, respectively. A significant inverse relationship between GMA and frequency of ICD therapies was identified, with the most pronounced difference between level I and level IV days (P<.001 for shocks; P=.008 for shocks + antitachycardia pacing). Conclusion In a large-scale cohort analysis, ICD therapies were delivered less frequently on days of higher GMA, confirming the previous pilot data and suggesting that higher GMA does not pose an increased risk of arrhythmias using ICD therapies as a surrogate marker. Further studies are needed to gain an in-depth understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961290246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961290246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.11.011
DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.11.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 25659238
AN - SCOPUS:84961290246
SN - 0025-6196
VL - 90
SP - 202
EP - 208
JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
IS - 2
ER -