Correction to

Detectable Neuropsychological Differences in Early Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: a Meta-Analysis (Neuropsychology Review, (2017), 27, 4, (305-325), 10.1007/s11065-017-9345-5)

S. Duke Han, Caroline P. Nguyen, Nikki Stricker, Daniel A. Nation

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Errors were discovered in the reporting of processing speed data that do not impact the interpretation of findings. Corrections to the text on page 8 should read as follows: 1. Under the Amyloid Positive Versus Negative section, following presentation of visuospatial ability results: “processing speed (12 studies: Hg = -0.247, SEg = 0.080, 95%CI = -0.404 to -0.089, p = 0.002)”. 2. Under the Amyloid Positive Versus Negative section, following presentation of memory heterogeneity results: “processing speed (Q = 13.657, p = 0.253, I2 = 19.454, Tau = 0.121, and Tau2 = 0.015)”. Also, below is a corrected Figure 6: (Figure presented.).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)326-327
Number of pages2
JournalNeuropsychology Review
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Neuropsychology
Amyloid
Meta-Analysis
Alzheimer Disease
Aptitude

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Correction to : Detectable Neuropsychological Differences in Early Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: a Meta-Analysis (Neuropsychology Review, (2017), 27, 4, (305-325), 10.1007/s11065-017-9345-5). / Han, S. Duke; Nguyen, Caroline P.; Stricker, Nikki; Nation, Daniel A.

In: Neuropsychology Review, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 326-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{891a7160488045648daca8bc8d55f16b,
title = "Correction to: Detectable Neuropsychological Differences in Early Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: a Meta-Analysis (Neuropsychology Review, (2017), 27, 4, (305-325), 10.1007/s11065-017-9345-5)",
abstract = "Errors were discovered in the reporting of processing speed data that do not impact the interpretation of findings. Corrections to the text on page 8 should read as follows: 1. Under the Amyloid Positive Versus Negative section, following presentation of visuospatial ability results: “processing speed (12 studies: Hg = -0.247, SEg = 0.080, 95{\%}CI = -0.404 to -0.089, p = 0.002)”. 2. Under the Amyloid Positive Versus Negative section, following presentation of memory heterogeneity results: “processing speed (Q = 13.657, p = 0.253, I2 = 19.454, Tau = 0.121, and Tau2 = 0.015)”. Also, below is a corrected Figure 6: (Figure presented.).",
author = "Han, {S. Duke} and Nguyen, {Caroline P.} and Nikki Stricker and Nation, {Daniel A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11065-017-9366-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "326--327",
journal = "Neuropsychology Review",
issn = "1040-7308",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Detectable Neuropsychological Differences in Early Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: a Meta-Analysis (Neuropsychology Review, (2017), 27, 4, (305-325), 10.1007/s11065-017-9345-5)

AU - Han, S. Duke

AU - Nguyen, Caroline P.

AU - Stricker, Nikki

AU - Nation, Daniel A.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Errors were discovered in the reporting of processing speed data that do not impact the interpretation of findings. Corrections to the text on page 8 should read as follows: 1. Under the Amyloid Positive Versus Negative section, following presentation of visuospatial ability results: “processing speed (12 studies: Hg = -0.247, SEg = 0.080, 95%CI = -0.404 to -0.089, p = 0.002)”. 2. Under the Amyloid Positive Versus Negative section, following presentation of memory heterogeneity results: “processing speed (Q = 13.657, p = 0.253, I2 = 19.454, Tau = 0.121, and Tau2 = 0.015)”. Also, below is a corrected Figure 6: (Figure presented.).

AB - Errors were discovered in the reporting of processing speed data that do not impact the interpretation of findings. Corrections to the text on page 8 should read as follows: 1. Under the Amyloid Positive Versus Negative section, following presentation of visuospatial ability results: “processing speed (12 studies: Hg = -0.247, SEg = 0.080, 95%CI = -0.404 to -0.089, p = 0.002)”. 2. Under the Amyloid Positive Versus Negative section, following presentation of memory heterogeneity results: “processing speed (Q = 13.657, p = 0.253, I2 = 19.454, Tau = 0.121, and Tau2 = 0.015)”. Also, below is a corrected Figure 6: (Figure presented.).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038813917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038813917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11065-017-9366-0

DO - 10.1007/s11065-017-9366-0

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 27

SP - 326

EP - 327

JO - Neuropsychology Review

JF - Neuropsychology Review

SN - 1040-7308

IS - 4

ER -