Controversies in vascular screening - Art versus science

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Whether or not to screen asymptomatic members of the general public for various forms of vascular disease is a controversial issue with huge medical, social, and financial ramifications. This article reviews several criteria for determining the appropriateness cf vascular screening, including: (1) is it possible to detect occult vascular disease 'early'?; (2) what should we screen for, and how should me do it?; (3) who should be screened?; and (4) what standards for vascular screening should be set? While some of these controversies may ultimately be resolvable using an evidence-based approach, it is apparent that there are issues which will not be amenable to strict scientific analysis. Individualized approaches to screening will therefore remain the rule for the foreseeable future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-242
Number of pages8
JournalVascular Medicine
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Art
Vascular Diseases
Blood Vessels

Keywords

  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)
  • Carotid disease
  • Peripheral arterial disease (PAD)
  • Venous insufficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Controversies in vascular screening - Art versus science. / Rooke, Thom W.

In: Vascular Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2007, p. 235-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{17914df99f094930b46190b2034b12eb,
title = "Controversies in vascular screening - Art versus science",
abstract = "Whether or not to screen asymptomatic members of the general public for various forms of vascular disease is a controversial issue with huge medical, social, and financial ramifications. This article reviews several criteria for determining the appropriateness cf vascular screening, including: (1) is it possible to detect occult vascular disease 'early'?; (2) what should we screen for, and how should me do it?; (3) who should be screened?; and (4) what standards for vascular screening should be set? While some of these controversies may ultimately be resolvable using an evidence-based approach, it is apparent that there are issues which will not be amenable to strict scientific analysis. Individualized approaches to screening will therefore remain the rule for the foreseeable future.",
keywords = "Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), Carotid disease, Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), Venous insufficiency",
author = "Rooke, {Thom W}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1177/1358863X07080836",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "235--242",
journal = "Vascular Medicine (United Kingdom)",
issn = "1358-863X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controversies in vascular screening - Art versus science

AU - Rooke, Thom W

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Whether or not to screen asymptomatic members of the general public for various forms of vascular disease is a controversial issue with huge medical, social, and financial ramifications. This article reviews several criteria for determining the appropriateness cf vascular screening, including: (1) is it possible to detect occult vascular disease 'early'?; (2) what should we screen for, and how should me do it?; (3) who should be screened?; and (4) what standards for vascular screening should be set? While some of these controversies may ultimately be resolvable using an evidence-based approach, it is apparent that there are issues which will not be amenable to strict scientific analysis. Individualized approaches to screening will therefore remain the rule for the foreseeable future.

AB - Whether or not to screen asymptomatic members of the general public for various forms of vascular disease is a controversial issue with huge medical, social, and financial ramifications. This article reviews several criteria for determining the appropriateness cf vascular screening, including: (1) is it possible to detect occult vascular disease 'early'?; (2) what should we screen for, and how should me do it?; (3) who should be screened?; and (4) what standards for vascular screening should be set? While some of these controversies may ultimately be resolvable using an evidence-based approach, it is apparent that there are issues which will not be amenable to strict scientific analysis. Individualized approaches to screening will therefore remain the rule for the foreseeable future.

KW - Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)

KW - Carotid disease

KW - Peripheral arterial disease (PAD)

KW - Venous insufficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36048935693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36048935693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1358863X07080836

DO - 10.1177/1358863X07080836

M3 - Review article

C2 - 17848484

AN - SCOPUS:36048935693

VL - 12

SP - 235

EP - 242

JO - Vascular Medicine (United Kingdom)

JF - Vascular Medicine (United Kingdom)

SN - 1358-863X

IS - 3

ER -