Contemporary outcomes of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: Comparison with primary angioplasty and the role of distal protection devices (EMERALD trial)

George Dangas, Gregg W. Stone, Mitchell D. Weinberg, John Webb, David A. Cox, Bruce R. Brodie, Mitchell W. Krucoff, Raymond J. Gibbons, Alexandra J. Lansky, Roxana Mehran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The value of distal protection devices during rescue PCI has not been studied. Methods: The population enrolled in a prospective, randomized multicenter trial of distal microcirculatory protection in ST-elevation MI, was stratified for those undergoing rescue (n = 93) or primary (n = 408) PCI; we performed the prespecified comparisons of distal protection in rescue and primary PCI. Results: Compared to primary PCI, rescue patients had higher baseline rates of TIMI-3 flow, but lower rates of post PCI TIMI-3 flow. However, no differences in the primary endpoints of complete ST-segment resolution (STR) at 30 minutes or infarct size, or 6 month mortality were present. In rescue PCI patients, randomization to distal protection did not significantly affect infarct size, STR, mortality or other clinical events. Conclusion: Despite reduced rates of post-procedural TIMI-3 flow, patients undergoing rescue PCI compared to primary PCI have similar myocardial perfusion, infarct size and clinical outcomes. Distal protection did not offer any detectable benefit in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1090-1096
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume155
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Contemporary outcomes of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: Comparison with primary angioplasty and the role of distal protection devices (EMERALD trial)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Dangas, G., Stone, G. W., Weinberg, M. D., Webb, J., Cox, D. A., Brodie, B. R., Krucoff, M. W., Gibbons, R. J., Lansky, A. J., & Mehran, R. (2008). Contemporary outcomes of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: Comparison with primary angioplasty and the role of distal protection devices (EMERALD trial). American Heart Journal, 155(6), 1090-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.12.003